What country of refuge can this guy get to and seek asylum?

Will this man’s character be media-hyped into a ‘public hanging’ which will be the response of today’s modern-day Gestapo?

Assange is just a publicist, the real culprits are those delivering the confidential gossip cables from the state department by the truckload.

To find out who / what Assange really is, one must know his whereabouts since the release of the initial ‘leaks’ of mis/dis/truformation made. 

Is he still traveling making speeches? 

Has he been seen?

Is he a CIA agent acting for US interests?

Is he a CIA agent acting against US interests?

Is he some hip tech punk who unfortunately chases little girls around and unfortunately wants to be rich and famous so he fortunately for history and for us to talk about searches and interviews ex military to expose the Machine?  To the chagrin of the PTB?

Is he a CIA agent acting for US interests, acting as a rogue?

Is he a CIA agent rogue with personal interests?

Whichever in whatever fashion… let’s also answer the questions to whether the statements are factual and what the outcome of those involved in, within, behind, before and who will end benefit ( and other angular modals ) needs to be seen.

Is he a CIA agent rogue acting for US interests acting as a rogue?

Yet who’s truth will be seen and which truth will be printed are the eastern and western shores of the pacific ocean… and that ocean will be our rendering of history, and various paradigms are emerging.

Is he a spy?

If so, for who?

Which royal family?

Which nouveau-riche fat-head hired him?

Is he just some sharp guy that found these gangsters out?

...only one life has been endangered… - risky business

http://blogs.alternet.org/penucquem/2010/10/11/julian-assange-cia-agent-provocateur/

Posted by Ronald West at 8:56 am
October 11, 2010 23

Julian Assange, CIA Agent Provocateur

Note added on 26 October 2010- If the WikiLeaks release of nearly 400,000
low level classified documents had been significant in uncovering a seminal
issue the U.S. military command is truly concerned with keeping secret, or had
the release been authentic in a sense of unscreened or unedited collection of
documents, there would have been something had jumped out and made
headlines worldwide: Covered up: More than 1/3 of American woman soldiers
raped

(excerpt)

As for Assange’s not caring about sources but only the documents authenticity,
one only need read how the CIA uses authentic documents to pursue a public
disinformation [psy-ops] agenda through leaks with the so-called “Pentagon
Papers” as detailed by a former Colonel of Intelligence who worked supporting
the CIA [Colonel Fletcher Prouty, author of The Secret Team]

Now, some 40 years later, we have the Pentagon in a manhunt for the founder
of ‘wikileaks’ and this is just too rich to pass up-

As they sound off about how “lives will be endangered” it’s clear only one life has been endangered: Assange’s

The Paparazzi are after him.

indeed!

building the legend

I would seem very likely that American Intelligence arranged for some unethical manipulative beautiful young women to set Julian Assange up.  It is the perfect method to neutralize an enemy in the eyes of the American public.

Julian Assange - a very brave soul !
It is my understanding that he has reliably and regularly provided materials to the
U.S. for review and redaction as appropriate.  It has not been his intention to place
individuals in harms way, but instead to provide accurate copies-truthful material
to the global community.  So far, from what I had read, there has been no threat,
but abject embarrassment to political powers.  If that is an accurate appraisal of
what Mr Assange has provided, then good for him.  Political powers in America
work for the people.  Those powers are not autonomous and they do not
supersede our will.
Better take note Mr. Obama, et al.

I think Assange is an example of seeking the truth and sharing it with others.

Here is someone, with all faults like any other person, facing The Machine with the Machine’s own truth.

What will lead to discovery are the whistle-blowers which will lead this empires downward spiral into splintered smaller empires.

This may produce an even more elite and demoniacally disengaged upper class… which are reaching to the extinction of the ‘lesser man’ in hopes of outliving the mortal existence, for we all must taste death… and I haven’t met any Enoch / Elijah types lately.

here’s hoping he survives a long time, and that more and more people send him information to release, can’t wait for the banks…

I think he has mommy issues.

Chomsky makes the point that the cables show diplomatic consensus on the threat posed by Iran, whereas polls demonstrate the Arab street is overwhelmingly supportive of Iran and regard Israel/US as the major threat in the region. The US, as usual, stands with the Arab dictators against the Arab people.

Assange is an heroic figure and may eventually be sacrificed on the altar of national security as an example to us all. Ecuador has offered to put him up. Surely there are enough democrats in the world to protect him!

The Paparazzi are after him.

Remember that quaint old document, The Bill of Rights? I think there is something there called the First Amendment which guarantees free speech. But, I know, times have changed, and it is probably now interpreted to mean that the government can torture or assassinate anyone they feel like if the said something or wrote something the President rules they should die for communicating.

Kind of like the TSA guy in San Diego who argued that the 4th Amendment gave him the right to feel up your balls.

Obviously George Orwell was right.

We can expect “entrapment” (which may have occurred already), and a loud and bleating effort to “kill the messenger”.
  Actually, Clinton’s self-righteous “There’s nothing laudable about endangering innocent people” sets forth the very question the United States should be asking itself—that is, what about “the endangerment of innocent people” caught up in wars for resources, national dominance and pride?
  If that question had long ago been allowed to penetrate the walls of power in Washington, there would probably never have been a Wikileaks exposure to try to get the madness stopped by throwing some light on hidden inanities such as who is buying whom behind the scenes at what price, to do what.
  A lot of noses may be out of joint over these leaks, but if the redactions were sufficiently inclusive, Assange will survive—with a little help from friends of justice. Manning may be in greater danger, if he has less than sufficient defense resources.