|
|
June 18, 2013
|
|
|
|
 Informants’ Names Accidentally Included in WikiLeaks ReleasePosted on Aug 29, 2011
Near the beginning of the year, WikiLeaks supporters released a collection of U.S. State Department documents that inadvertently contained the names of confidential sources. Unlike previous releases, the names were not redacted. The publication seems to mean that an unknown number of lives and livelihoods are in jeopardy. —ARK
Advertisement TAGS:
|
Bank of America Lied to Homeowners and Rewarded Foreclosures, Ex-Employees Say
Email 
Print
Share
Email to a friend
Newsletter 
Like Us
Follow Us
Get Our Feed
Tags|Bazaar|Podcast|About Us|Contact Us|User Agreement|Privacy Policy|FAQ: Comments and Moderation | Google+
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.
By Peter Knopfler, September 1, 2011 at 7:56 am Link to this comment
THE GUARDIAN BETRAYED JULIAN TO FORCE EXTRADITION TO
Report thisSWEDEN THEN HE WILL BE SOLD BY SWEDEN TO USA= WATER
BOARDING AND MANNING STYLE TORTURE FOR JULIAN!
USA KILLER CREEPS EXPECT THE WORST FOR JULIAN AND
MANNING; SHAME USA TORTURE CREEPS BUSH CHENEY MURDERS
GREAT AMERICAN KILLERS:
By diamond, August 30, 2011 at 3:23 pm Link to this comment
“wikileaks: Totally false that any WikiLeaks sources have been exposed or will be exposed. NYT drooling, senile, and evil”
Who’s telling the truth?
Who do you think? Since the NYT routinely lies about almost everything it’s not hard to work out. I don’t read newspapers any more at all, except for the arts section, and this kind of thing is a confirmation of my decision.
Report thisBy Anarcissie, August 30, 2011 at 1:51 pm Link to this comment
While the NYT is certainly senile and evil, I was unaware that it drooled.
Report thisBy Aaron Ortiz, August 30, 2011 at 10:55 am Link to this comment
According to Wikileaks, this is false…no names have been published. They tweeted thus:
“wikileaks: Totally false that any WikiLeaks sources have been exposed or will be exposed. NYT drooling, senile, and evil”
Who’s telling the truth?
Report thisBy gerard, August 30, 2011 at 10:24 am Link to this comment
Is transparency essential to democratic government?
Report thisAre we going to be able to attain and maintain transparency in government?
What is necessary in order to attain and maintain transparency in democratic government?
How can individual citizens help to attain and maintain that transparency?
By glider, August 30, 2011 at 9:17 am Link to this comment
More kill the messenger media focus. So far there is not a single instance of a life lost due to Wikileaks which certainly can not be said about the policies of the U.S. Government that were revealed. But you can count on the corporate media to exploit any opportunity to discredit Assange while doings its best to ignore and make excuses regarding the revelations of corruption and injustice that are revealed. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
Report thisBy Anarcissie, August 30, 2011 at 7:01 am Link to this comment
It’s been pointed out before degrading one’s enemy may make him more dangerous. The powers that be have done a lot of damage to Assange, maybe even more than he has done to himself, so his operation is going to be less careful to make nice. As Machiavelli said, ‘If you strike at a prince, you had better kill him.’ The U.S. government will probably try to correct their oversight in this regard before too long. Fortunately others are ready to take up the general project.
Report thisBy SoTexGuy, August 30, 2011 at 6:31 am Link to this comment
Out the bums..
Anyhow, it’s entirely likely this ‘accident’ will serendipitously provide grounds for
the US government to ‘take off the kid gloves’ and go get Assange.. torture him,
and convict him, or just disappear him..
Adios!
Report thisBy Drakula, August 30, 2011 at 2:53 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Ouch!!!Making a few mistakes this field seems to be a mine field, one must protect the source.
Report this