LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     gay marriage     barack obama     ndaa     robert scheer     chris hedges
Most Read

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Truthdiggers of the Week: 400,000 Canadians Launching the ‘Maple Spring’

I Can't Hear Myself Think

Russia and Exxon Mobil Sign Arctic Oil Deal

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Demanding More of the Wealthy

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Sep 26, 2011
Flickr / epSos.de

If you’re tuned into your social surroundings, you’re likely to hear people arguing over whether raising taxes on the rich would be a good thing or a bad thing for Americans. With election season on its way, the noise and volume are bound to rise.

To prepare for the next time you find yourself faced with the discussion in a bank or convenience store, Mother Jones examines six commonly heard arguments against taxing the rich, and offers six reasonable answers. —ARK

Mother Jones:

It reduces incentives to work and invest

Experience shows otherwise. As Nancy Folbre points out over at Economix, “average annual rates of growth in gross domestic product in the high tax era between 1950 and 1980 exceeded those of the last 30 years. Increases in the top tax rate under President Bill Clinton were followed by robust economic expansion.”

It’s unfair

In the libertarian view, the rich are entitled to their gains because they worked for them. But this ignores how structural changes in the economy such as globalization, financial deregulation, and the rise of the knowledge-based economy have disproportionately rewarded the wealthy. At the same time, we’ve failed to reinvest in government programs that once leveled the playing field, such as financing for community colleges and public universities.

Read more

 

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

prisnersdilema's avatar

By prisnersdilema, September 27, 2011 at 5:26 am Link to this comment

You still don’t get it…...where else can the military industrial complex turn for money, now
that the assets of American workers have been globalized.

Trying to hold on to assets acquired with a base salary of 60,000 a year from a
manufacturing job that’s been globalized, on the salary of your new job of $25,000 a
year is next to impossible. Even though its more in line with the assets of workers from
the rest of the world, who are now our direct competitors. They have no assets and are
lucky to feed themselves.

The globalization of America, means that our biggest exports are our jobs, and the value
of the assets held by our former workforce. This while the cost of the things Americans
need to buy are no matter how cheaply the are made in communist China will sky
rocket.

Globalization, is never going to restore the standard of living here, quite the contrary.

How will America afford, the vast budget for it’s military industrial complex, whose black
budget is larger than the non black budget, without looting the wealth of the wealthy?

I suspect at some point military planners will realize, globalization is a bad thing for our
military, its economic warfare. First will come Marital law, then a military dictatorship.
ANd those copororate crooks who destroyed this country through globalization will lose
their assests just like the rest of us.  I hope to see them behind bars, as the greedy
traitors they are.

Report this

By GW=MCHammered, September 26, 2011 at 10:51 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

What about the Wage Tax waged by the wealthy?

They weren’t entitled to that.

Using easy credit and more tactics, they masked swiping from workers’ pockets more than their share of the American economic pie. And now that money’s tight, just try getting your bank to pay you credible rates for earned savings. Something’s beyond jury-rigged here.

Mother Jones nailed this one.

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.