Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Left Masthead
June 26, 2016
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Donald Trump Frees Us to Vote as We Wish




All the Single Ladies

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground
Print this item

The Real Reason the GOP Foreign Policy Elite Prefer Hillary Clinton to Donald Trump

Posted on Mar 15, 2016

    Hillary Clinton. (Patrick Semansky / AP)

The Intercept’s Jon Schwarz warns readers they shouldn’t be “shocked to see ideology so easily trump party affiliation” when it comes to Republicans saying they’d vote for Hillary Clinton. As Schwarz points out, Clinton has had a “long history of collaboration with GOP on foreign policy,” and is as much of a war hawk as many Republicans. Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul and Republican front-runner Donald Trump, on the other hand, aren’t “belligerent enough, particularly about the Iraq war, Libya, Israel-Palestine, and Russia.”

From The Intercept:

... the GOP foreign policy elite see Hillary Clinton as preferable to either Trump or Paul. Her belligerence has never been in doubt. For her entire public life, she’s been an enthusiastic exponent of a deeply bipartisan consensus on foreign policy, one that says the U.S. can and should run the world. This has been evident in her personal lobbying as first lady for the Kosovo war in 1999; her push as secretary of state for escalation in Afghanistan; her support for regime change in Libya; and her call now as a presidential candidate for the deployment of more U.S. special operations troops in Syria. But it’s perhaps clearest in her and Bill Clinton’s decadeslong embrace of regime change in Iraq.

When it comes to domestic policies, there are genuine differences between Republican and Democratic elites. The Republicans’ most dearly held dream is to smash the New Deal and return the U.S. to circa 1900, complete with catastrophic financial panics and mass public poisonings. By contrast, Democratic elites understand that letting the 99 percent eat most days actually enhances corporate profitability.

But on foreign policy, the two parties are now like-minded enough that when the candidate for one strays from party orthodoxy, the candidate for the other may be a more than adequate substitute. As Max Boot, a prominent neoconservative writer, adviser to Marco Rubio, and (if necessary) Clinton voter, says: “What she basically espouses is a pretty mainstream view.” Even Dick Cheney has praised her competence and mused that “it would be interesting to speculate about how she might perform were she to be president.”

Read more.

— Posted by Natasha Hakimi Zapata

 

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 

Like Truthdig on Facebook