Top Leaderboard, Site wide
August 27, 2014
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Help us grow by sharing
and liking Truthdig:
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed


sign up to get updates

2014 and the Limits of Rage
The Guns of August

Truthdig Bazaar
Backroom Politics

Backroom Politics

By Bill and Nancy Boyarsky

more items

Ear to the Ground

When It Comes to War, Congress Is on Permanent Vacation

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Apr 25, 2010
U.S. Air Force / Staff Sgt. Manuel J. Martinez

Judging by the lack of interest, involvement and oversight, it’s difficult not to conclude that Congress has largely taken a not-my-problem approach to America’s wars.

Sure, lawmakers will hold the occasional hearing and file their sound bites in the record, but more troops and more funding are always available to the president who wants them.

This is especially vexing, as Stephen R. Weissman points out in Roll Call, because “it is widely accepted that past administrations, acting without Congressional input, made huge mistakes in America’s last two major wars.”

Weissman reports that this head-in-the-sand behavior persists even when obvious questions present themselves, as with Afghanistan and Ambassador Karl Eikenberry’s leaked wires.  —PZS

Stephen Weissman in Roll Call:

According to several officials, key Congressional foreign policy committees have neither received nor requested a National Intelligence Estimate or comparable broad intelligence community analysis of the issues in Afghanistan. They have denied themselves a major resource of Congress in foreign policy: the ability to compare intelligence analysis with administration policy judgments. In Iraq, the Senate at least requested and received an NIE; its mistake was in failing to examine the document and reveal its flaws.

Learning little from its failures to expose administration divisions over Vietnam and Iraq, Congress has fumbled a golden opportunity to assess the U.S. Embassy in Kabul’s last-minute dissent from the developing Dec. 1 decision for a U.S. military “surge.” When news leaked of two November cables from Ambassador Karl Eikenberry “expressing deep concerns about sending more U.S. troops to Afghanistan,” one key foreign policy committee requested the classified documents. The State Department refused to provide them, and the committee never considered using its subpoena power, according to an informed source. Eikenberry subsequently testified that after “refinement” and “clarification” he was now “100 percent supportive” of the president’s strategy. No Congressman from either party pressed him to describe the basis of his reported reservations or how they were resolved.

Read more

More Below the Ad


Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Marshall K, April 27, 2010 at 7:03 am Link to this comment

No it’s OK because it’s Obama, he’s the kinder,
gentler, progressive warmonger.

Report this

By doublestandards/glasshouses, April 26, 2010 at 12:13 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

A democratic imperial presidency is different from a republican imperial presidency.  Democratic torture is different from republican torture.  Democratic civilian massacres are different from republican civilian massacres.  A democratic shredding of the bill of rights is different from a republican shredding of the bill of rights.  Habeas corpus, what habeas corpus?  We don’t need it ‘cause there’s a democrat in the white house.  A democratic patriot act is different from a republican patriot act.  A $1 trillion democratic defense budget is different from a $1 trillion republican defense budget.

Report this

By samosamo, April 26, 2010 at 11:57 am Link to this comment

Just what one would expect when the military becomes another
branch in the government all bought and paid for by the
corporate monster that has overthrown and commandeered our
country. So I think I can safely assume that the branches of this
new government consists of, in descending order:

Mainstream Media
Supreme Court

And to ensure the integrity of these new branches the people are
relegated to a position of ‘you can watch but you cannot
participate or effect the workings of the new government’.

Report this

By Vic Anderson, April 26, 2010 at 7:12 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

AD HOC: (Another Demiserepubilkan Heap Of Corp.) on the US Constitution and
US, its constituents! Come November, 2010 and 12, Take NO incumbents!!

Report this

By NYCartist, April 26, 2010 at 4:37 am Link to this comment

And complete abandonment to the control by/ of the Administration, for Dems.

Report this

By NYCartist, April 26, 2010 at 4:35 am Link to this comment

Hiding, not vacation, so they don’t have to “take responsibility”.  They are there for votes on funding the wars and Pentagon budget, please note.

Report this
thebeerdoctor's avatar

By thebeerdoctor, April 26, 2010 at 3:47 am Link to this comment

For the Democratic wing of the ownership class, war is no longer a problem, now that Obama has become the President.

Report this
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.