|
|||
|
What Went Awry in Copenhagen?Posted on Dec 22, 2009
A lot of hoopla, and even hope, went into this month’s Copenhagen climate convention, and leaders from a slew of nations showed up to try to strike an agreement. So why wasn’t a bigger, better deal reached by the end of their power huddle? The BBC’s Richard Black offers eight possible reasons. —KA
Advertisement Previous item: Alabama Congressman Changes Parties Over Health Care Next item: Obama Defiant in Face of Health Care Criticism New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By webberwokky, December 23, 2009 at 11:24 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
What went awry? The British simply failed to install their Dictatorship by Elite Psychopaths on the world as they have installed in Britain over the hapless and pathetic British citizens. What went awry? The psychopathic pathological liars simply didn’t get away with it. That’s all.
Report thisBy diman, December 23, 2009 at 8:17 am Link to this comment
By Gerard:
“As global warming proves itself day after day, and results become ever clearer…”
Especially in Europe the results of “global warming” are so clear.
Report thisBy rollzone, December 22, 2009 at 3:42 pm Link to this comment
hello. kookovia has been closed. go ahead, turn your thermostat down 1 degree. we affect our enclosed environments, while nature renews itself every moment at the periphery of sunrise. it’s a beautiful thing to witness. you can go suck on a tailpipe, today; and it will not kill you. the EPA is going too far now, and so is the U.N. (a league of temper tantrums with their hands out for borrowed American tax payer dollars). we should absolve ourselves from all dealings with the United Nations. all employees of the Gore publishing network: should apply themselves to reality-based ‘green’ changes, without costing us more jobs, or closing more industries. there is no science [outside of a closed lab environment] that determines humans have more to do with global warming than sunspots. Copenhagen was a hashish vacation.
Report thisBy gerard, December 22, 2009 at 2:50 pm Link to this comment
Huge, quick jump necessary: From now on, every country in the world, large or small, rich or poor, is going to have to see itself as part of one planet. The provincialism of special interests is going to have to die a natural death. This will be a major shift in world history, and we can thank climate change for hastening the unitary view.
Report thisAs global warming proves itself day after day, and results become ever clearer. governments (to retain any semblance of legitimacy) are going to have to keep in touch with the best science and take measures with all possible speed in proportion to the damage they are doing or the damage they are suffering.
Many people will want to resist awareness and action because that requires taking responsibility for others. Some will resist out of “rugged individualism” and selfishness; others out of inability to comprehend or lack of information. Governments will therefore have a primary responsibility to inform accurately as well as to cooperate with each other.
A decade or more, perhaps, before people can catch up with the realities. This means a dire need of reliable leadership—even statesmanship beyond the ordinary need. If we can make the jump into reality, everybody will be better off for the change. Better to look at it as an opportunity than as a looming disaster.
Copenhagen was only a second small step into a maze of problems, attitudes and interests. Practice usually bring improvement. Time sorts things out.
By BaldwinDad, December 22, 2009 at 2:39 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The main reason is that public support is not behind this fallacy of man made global warming.
The other reason is just like acid rain, the wheels are coming off the Global Warming/Climate Change bandwagon as more and more credible research comes to light showing it to be not man made but a natural cycle of the planet.
I’m sorry if you in the last 2000 years you chose to build your civilization someplace that in the next 2000 might no longer exist, but that is the way the planet works.
Report thisBy ChaoticGood, December 22, 2009 at 1:15 pm Link to this comment
It is very difficult to convince someone of something where denial of that “something” is a key factor in keeping their job.
Report thisThere is no reason to think that anything serious will be done about global warming until the “wolf is at the door”.
People just don’t get excited about future threats, no matter how well documented. It is a human flaw and it may be our “epitaph”.