Top Leaderboard, Site wide
July 28, 2014
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Help us grow by sharing
and liking Truthdig:
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Newsletter

sign up to get updates


Wishful Thinking About Natural Gas
Rising Heat Hits Indian Wheat Crop




The Sixth Extinction
War of the Whales


Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

What The New York Times Doesn’t Understand About Taxes

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Apr 5, 2011
romana klee (CC-BY-SA)

The idea was good: Get a reporter to find out what New York’s rich will do with the extra money they are going to have now that the new Democratic governor, Andrew Cuomo, has won his struggle against extending the “millionaires’ tax,” a surcharge that was instituted in 2009 on high-income families. The problem is, the story hinges on the numbers, and the numbers as reported by The New York Times are (this is turning into a disturbing pattern) all wrong.

A family that has an adjusted income of $350,000 will see its tax reduced by $500, but The New York Times reports that the reduction will be $3,500. A family that has an adjusted gross income of $550,000 will see its tax reduced by $3,060, but The New York Times reports that the reduction will be $11,660. A family with an adjusted gross income of $1 million will pay $12,600, or 1.3 percent of its income, less in taxes, but The New York Times reports that the reduction will be $21,200. In other words, the actual surcharges were so small that there is little doubt they would not have caused any families to leave the state.

Why did the paper make these mistakes? Along with most citizens in this country, The New York Times doesn’t know how taxes work, and the paper apparently believes that the rich pay a lot more in taxes than they actually do. When one reminds people that during the Eisenhower years the highest marginal tax rate was 91 percent, they recoil, thinking that if we were to return to those tax rates, the rich would have to pay 91 cents of every dollar they are paid. In fact, marginal tax rates apply only to particular income brackets and the expiring 1 percent surcharge in New York applied only to the adjusted gross income between $300,000 and $500,000. The 2.12 percent surcharge that applied to adjusted gross income above $500,000 also did not apply to any other income.

One of the people who The Times interviewed about the tax cuts was Jamie Cohen, who opined that “$250,000 here is different than $250,000 anywhere else,” and he is, of course, right. But what Jamie did not seem to know is that a married couple with less than $300,000 in adjusted income will not see a reduction in their taxes at all, since the tax reduction applies only to the very rich. David Chitel, the founder of a media entertainment startup who put his household income at $300,000 plus, told The Times that he will either “save the tax windfall or put it toward college funds for his two young children.” If only.

As written in earlier pieces here, it’s deeply worrisome that The New York Times does not know the numbers. 

As a result, the paper repeatedly misleads its readers, implying that state workers earn more than the average pay of private sector employees in the state while in fact they earn a lot less, and presenting the budget deficit as huge, whereas it is merely about 1 percent of personal income, and could therefore be easily closed by a small increase in taxes instead of a huge decrease in government services. And this is the paper of record?

Moshe Adler teaches economics at Columbia University and at the Harry Van Arsdale Center for Labor Studies at Empire State College. He is the author of “Economics for the Rest of Us: Debunking the Science That Makes Life Dismal,” just out in paperback from The New Press.

—Posted by Moshe Adler.

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Loans next day, May 21, 2011 at 3:09 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

There are many people who don’t understand that the term just indicates how much of the last dollar (be it your $10k +1 or your $10m +1) made will be compensated in taxes.

Report this

By Christian, April 6, 2011 at 11:44 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Go to http://www.edrivera.com or http://www.constitutionpreservation.org or
http://www.barefootsworld.net to see the REAL “Truth” of this matter and why taxes are a JOKE! Also look up code 861, Nuff said! They are ALL liers for the IMF!

Report this

By Quig, April 6, 2011 at 7:00 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Def: “A marginal tax rate is the tax rate that applies to the last dollar of the tax base (taxable income or spending).”

Many people don’t understand that the term simply indicates how much of the last dollar (be it your $10k +1 or your $10m +1) made will be paid in taxes. It is not an average of any amount or anything like a ‘bracket’.

One valuable effect of a rising marginal tax rate is that greed becomes a public benefit. Or, of course, sometimes it turns people into tax cheats!

As Moshe Adler makes wonderfully clear, we should be able to count on the New York Times to have their writers and editors understand what’s being presented and have verified its accuracy.

The Grey Lady should be pink with embarrassment…

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, April 6, 2011 at 6:53 pm Link to this comment

MK:

“whose interests does the NYT represent?”

The stockholders of NYT, Inc.

Report this
MK Ultra's avatar

By MK Ultra, April 6, 2011 at 3:14 pm Link to this comment

The issues raised in this article can easily be addressed by asking a simple question: whose interests does the NYT represent?  Once that question is answered, it becomes abundantly clear why.  They are only doing what they are paid to do and telling the truth ain’t it.

Report this

By Big B, April 6, 2011 at 8:04 am Link to this comment

But isn’t the “Times” the touchstone of americas liberal media?

Shit.

Report this
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.