|
|||
|
What Do AIG’s E-Mails Reveal?Posted on Dec 29, 2009
We all know the outcome now, but in the latter months of 2007 executives at AIG seemed to be only starting to catch wind of the problems that eventually led to the nationwide financial collapse the firm helped precipitate a year later. Were they just overly confident? Clueless? Or were they hiding the fact that they knew very well that the jig was up? The Washington Post has looked into the troubled company’s e-mails to see what some of the key players at AIG were telling each other as trouble began looming large. —KA
Advertisement Previous item: Argentine Couple Wed in Latin America's First Gay Marriage Next item: Larry's List: Jewish Mother Edition New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By Aarky, December 30, 2009 at 7:09 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Most of AIG’s losses came from credit default swaps. What should be infuriating is that with all this information available and the potential for the same thing to happen in the future, our members of Congress have not made any attempt to seriously re-regulate the financial industry. One provision of the Commodities Modernization Act of 2000 (written by Enron lawyers and passed to Mrs. Phil Graham who was on the Enron Board, who then passed it to her husband Senator Phil Graham) was that derivitives would not be regulated. That Act should have been scrapped, but powerful members of Congress (think Barny Frank) have been adequately compensated to sing the tune of the Wall Street crooks.
Report thisBy glider, December 29, 2009 at 11:34 pm Link to this comment
I find it surprising that AIG would have kept long term email records. I recall some time ago that a government regulation was passed requiring email records to be kept for some period of time (about 6 months). Where I worked this “regulation” had precisely the opposite effect being touted by the politicians. Emails previously kept due to uncertainty about ones responsibility for keeping these records were then deleted under the direction of management. IT systems were even set up to force deletions of emails older than the specified time in order to insure avoidance of potential legal liabilities.
Report this