Top Leaderboard, Site wide
August 29, 2014
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Help us grow by sharing
and liking Truthdig:
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Newsletter

sign up to get updates


Have We Gone to War Again?






Truthdig Bazaar
Past Imperfect

Past Imperfect

By Julian Fellowes
$16.49

Hope: A Tragedy: A Novel

Hope: A Tragedy: A Novel

By Shalom Auslander

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

We Deserve the Truth From Citigroup, Judge Rules

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Nov 28, 2011
Eflon (CC-BY)

A federal judge will not accept the SEC’s settlement with Citigroup for defrauding its customers of more than $700 million in just one of the firm’s lousy investment opportunities.

Judge Jed Rakoff wrote in his decision that the $285 million settlement amounts to “the cost of doing business” for Citigroup, which he called a “recidivist” institution. The judge said the deal was not in the public interest and he took particular objection to the fact that Citigroup would be let off the hook without any admission of guilt. Rakoff also admonished the SEC itself for claiming that the settlement need not serve the public interest and for submitting, after years of investigation, a deal that was “neither fair, nor reasonable, nor adequate, nor in the public interest.”

The judge’s full decision can be read here. Below are two choice excerpts (with formatting removed).  —PZS

Of course, the policy of accepting settlements without any admissions serves various narrow interests of the parties. In this case, for example, Citigroup was able, without admitting anything, to negotiate a settlement that (a) charges it only with negligence, (b) results in a very modest penalty, (c) imposes the kind of injunctive relief that Citigroup (a recidivist) knew that the S.E.C. had not sought to enforce against any financial institution for at least the last 10 years, see SEC Mem. at 23, and (d) imposes relatively inexpensive prophylactic measures for the next three years. In exchange, Citigroup not only settles what it states was a broadranging four-year investigation by the S.E.C. of Citigroup’s mortgage-backed securities offerings, Tr . 27, but also avoid any investors’ relying in any respect on the S.E.C. Cons ent Judgment in seeking return of their losses. If the allegations of the Complaint are true, this is a very good deal for Citigroup; and, even if they are untrue, it is a mild and modest cost of doing business.

[...]

Finally, in any case like this that touches on the transparency of financial markets whose gyrations have so depressed our economy and debilitated our lives, there is an overriding public interest in knowing the truth. In much of the world, propaganda reigns, and truth is confined to secretive, fearful whispers. Even in our nation, apologists for suppressing or obscuring the truth may always be found. But the S.E.C., of all agencies, has a duty, inherent in its statutory mission, to see that the truth emerges; and if fails to do so, this Court must not, in the name of deference or convenience, grant judicial enforcement to the agency’s contrivances.

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By alton grimes, December 4, 2011 at 12:17 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I felt the unmistakable voice of a true patriot coming
through the judges pronouncement.

Report this

By Zephram Cochrane, November 29, 2011 at 4:54 pm Link to this comment

Matt Taibbi has been following this one for awhile. He has a good take on it at
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/federal-judge-pimp-slaps-
the-sec-over-citigroup-settlement-20111129

There’s also a video.

Report this

By Jim Yell, November 29, 2011 at 10:47 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

A breath of fresh air, but can they make it stick?

Report this

By lasmog, November 29, 2011 at 10:30 am Link to this comment

It sounds like corporations will have to begin offering huge paydays to former judges in order to more completely control the judiciary. You can bet the 1% will not allow this display of judicial integrity to go unchallenged.

Report this
BrooklynDame's avatar

By BrooklynDame, November 29, 2011 at 7:29 am Link to this comment

Thank goodness! A judge who doesn’t appear to be store-bought-and-paid-for by
corporate owners!  Now, if only we can get banking reform to turn into a real
movement…maybe we can get a Glass-Stegall type of reform to bring these ‘too
big to fail’ institutions of malfeasance back in line.
http://borderlessnewsandviews.com/2011/10/another-big-bank-heist/

Report this

By DBM, November 29, 2011 at 7:18 am Link to this comment

Rakoff for President of the Free World ...

Report this

By ardee, November 29, 2011 at 3:22 am Link to this comment

Judge Rakoff, a Clinton appointee by the by, has defended the honor of the law and the courts admirably in this case. But one cannot help but wonder if his decision is doomed to be overturned by a higher court.

Report this

By chip, November 29, 2011 at 12:30 am Link to this comment

RIGHT ON, The peoples voice is heard, finally.

Spread the good word folks, You know the MSM won’t.

The word of the day is “Recidivist” (a relapse into crime by a convicted criminal)

Thank You Judge Rakoff

Report this
amunaor's avatar

By amunaor, November 28, 2011 at 11:00 pm Link to this comment

Bless you Judge Rakoff!

Sunlight is ‘always’ the best disinfectant. Let it all hang out!

Report this

By gerard, November 28, 2011 at 6:40 pm Link to this comment

Go, Judge Rakoff!

Report this
Tesla's avatar

By Tesla, November 28, 2011 at 6:09 pm Link to this comment

It seems that not every judge is a stooge for the
Corporatists. A small win for the People.

Report this

By faith, November 28, 2011 at 6:03 pm Link to this comment

Justice Rakoff we need you in California !  Wonderful decision.  Thoughtful and
fairly analyzed and decided.  Yes !  There are some fair judges out there.  Justice
Rakoff has renewed my faith in the judicial system.

Report this

By C, November 28, 2011 at 6:00 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

RIGHT ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  I love this guy!

Report this
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.