|
|
May 21, 2013
|
|
U.S. Postal Service Begs Congress for HelpPosted on Sep 4, 2011
The United States Postal Service can’t pay its bills, and management is asking Congress for money and concessions, including eliminating 220,000 jobs. This, despite agreeing in May not to lay off workers. The USPS is a strange beast, providing a public service while competing in the marketplace. Too often we forget the first part while obsessing over the second. Still, there are complexities to consider. The service can’t drastically increase its rates or suspend Saturday delivery without permission from Congress. At the same time, it has to contend with FedEx and the Internet. For all its faults, the Postal Service is a remarkable organization. Handling some 3 billion pieces of mail a week, the men and women working in those beehives and driving those trucks manage to transport our most important messages from door to door, one coast to another, all for pocket change. Here’s hoping they’re still in business this winter. —PZS
Advertisement New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By xaipe23, September 17, 2011 at 11:49 am Link to this comment
This is a no-brainer. Charge bulk mail at a much higher (and fairer) rate; do away with Congressional franking privileges, they make enough money as it is.
Report thisBy David W. Kent, September 11, 2011 at 5:36 am Link to this comment
We need to support the U.S. Postal service. It is an essential service for a society. As a senior, I can say, they have never lost one of my letters.
I don’t begrudge any benefits postal workers receive. The compliants about beneifts is just plain backbitting.
I was dismayed when President Obama praised Fed-Ex and sort of dismissed the Postal Service in one of his early speaches. The U.S. Postal Service has a completely different mandate.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, September 8, 2011 at 5:10 am Link to this comment
Maybe we can have the military deliver the mail, there is plenty of funding for them.
Report thisBy Marian Griffith, September 7, 2011 at 1:45 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
@Robespierre115
—-It’s pretty pathetic that the most powerful country in the world can’t even keep the MAIL going.—-
it may be pathetic, but it is also strangely appropriate.
Report thisBy bogi666, September 5, 2011 at 11:36 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
It’s the tons of junk mail, which is subsidized by 1st class postage. It’s another welfare benefit for the corporate junk mailers, both profit and non profit. It’s a no bainer in that the officials and politicians which are necessary to bribe are bribed to ensure that the corporate welfare kings get subsidized postal rates.
Report thisBy mrfreeze, September 5, 2011 at 9:42 pm Link to this comment
Even when I was using USPS to deliver local marketing materials for my small business, I never spent that much on postage. Now that I’m back to mailing an occasional letter or paying a few bills via the post office (not many), I’m hardly spending any money on stamps or any of USPS’s other services. I’m amazed that they stay in business….EXCEPT FOR all the heinous advertising shit that’s out there. I swear to god, there’s a special place in hell for those who produce the Chase, BofA, Insurance and other advertising that is mailed to us. It’s all shit…........
Report thisBy L K Snider, September 5, 2011 at 6:30 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Maybe if the USPS charged more for delivering the tons of junk mail we all get everyday, they wouldn’t be in such a bind. It’s time they pay for what is used, as it is used, rather than negotiating better deals for those who waste not only the trees to make paper, but the fuel to deliver trash. And if our government “servants” weren’t allowed to send out the garbage political propaganda they do (at no cost to themselves, I might add) we might all get a bit more peace of mind as well.
Times have changed…it’s just mail, but how much is spent to continually design “new stamps” that inevitably end up in the trash anyway.
Report thisBy purplewolf, September 5, 2011 at 4:33 pm Link to this comment
There are a few ways in which the P.O. can cut costs. First, advertising on TV and other forms of media. How many millions of dollars are wasted there ? If I need to mail something, I do so. No amount of advertising will change that. As an on line seller I use the USPS for my customer orders and another costly, confusing and wasteful thing the P.O. does is constantly changing postal rates, box sizes, flat rate boxes being re-sized, designs on stamps always changing and it is not cheap to do this, several different postal rates i.e.first class, media mail,flat rate rate, parcel post and other mailing categories. Most other countries do not have all of these different selections for postal rates and do not have the problems we have here. Time to simplify the ridiculous shuffle game the P.O. plays in this country with different rates and designs and then they would not be running out of money.
Report thisBy stacy, September 5, 2011 at 1:57 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
and about Fed Ex, they pick and choose which areas to cover. They do not operate
Report thisin many of the more rural parts of the country because it’s not profitable enough.
USPS delivers everywhere, profit or not. That’s why government is suppose to take
care of certain things, the so called free markets sole purpose is profit, our
Government purpose is to serve We the People.
By spktruth200, September 5, 2011 at 9:45 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The postal service is a great operation and should be cherished by the american people. If the Congress doesnt help its more job loss for the country. You can bet the repukes will want to privatize it and then charge $1.00 a letter.
Report thisBy miserere, September 5, 2011 at 8:57 am Link to this comment
Sorry, but the current laws mandate that the USPS does not make any profit. If it does make any profits, it will need to turn it over to the Treasury Department. BTW, the USPS made half a billion profit in the last quarter of 2010.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, September 5, 2011 at 8:37 am Link to this comment
Raise the postal rates to a minimum buck a letter and especially raise the rates on junk mailers, how they get better rates than the U.S. citizen is corporistic.
Retirements start at 55 with a minimum of 30 years employment and a penalty up to 65.
Any profits go to pay off the national debt.
Report thisBy james jewett, September 5, 2011 at 8:19 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The truth is they were forced to prepay the burden of their retirement health benefits. That is where their problem lies.
Report thisBy miserere, September 5, 2011 at 7:49 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
As bizarre as the whole shell game is, it’s probably the best current example of bipartisanship on Capitol Hill: Democrats get to shave a few billion off the national debt, and Republicans are spared the inconvenient example of a government run enterprise that makes a profit- instead warning of “taxpayer bailouts” when no “taxpayer” money is involved! It’s a win-win- at least for the politicians.
Report thisBy sharonsj, September 5, 2011 at 7:21 am Link to this comment
If you’re going to post articles, could you find ones that actually have information? I’ve read elsewhere that Congress (I guess mostly Repubs) passed a law forcing only the Post Office to fund things that other agencies don’t have to fund. That is resulting in the PO running out of money.
I bet it’s another Repub plot to privatize every fucking aspect of our lives so they can get even richer. Wake up, America—the conservatives don’t give a shit about you unless you have money. Otherwise you’ll be paying $5 to mail a letter.
Report thisBy yrwehere, September 5, 2011 at 7:10 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Most of the Post office issues could be eliminated if Congress would allow them to fund their pensions at the same levels as everyone else. They are required by law to fund it at 2006 levels. Well they have 250,000 less employees than they did! No other shipping business require 6 day operations, no are they required to deliver everywhere…
Report thisBy miserere, September 5, 2011 at 7:01 am Link to this comment
If it were a full government agency, maybe it wouldn’t have this problem. All they have to do is to raise some taxes and use your tax dollars to pay for its bills….
However, since the Postal Reorganization Act of 1970, I thought, the U.S. Postal Service had stopped being a full federal agency. It is now a semi-privatized federal agency that is mandated to be revenue-neutral. Yes, you heard right. By law, the USPS is not allowed to make a profit even though they have a monopoly in certain areas. Perhaps if the law changed so that the USPS is allowed to make a profit, there wouldn’t be a problem such as this?
Report thisBy Robespierre115, September 5, 2011 at 2:49 am Link to this comment
“The difference is that US postal workers get government healthcare, and retirement benefits for licking stamps from 9-5, unlike many other vocations contributing to society that get nothing.”
So…we should just let the postal service die and leave the mail purely in privatized, corporate hands? There’s a lot more to it than just “licking stamps.” This is more of a wake up call to take back our basic services and stop turning them into casino playing chips for Wall Street.
It’s pretty pathetic that the most powerful country in the world can’t even keep the MAIL going.
Report thisBy zonth_zonth, September 5, 2011 at 12:45 am Link to this comment
“US Postal Service asks Congress for Help”
“American Taxpayers ask Congress for single payer healthcare”
The difference is that US postal workers get government healthcare, and retirement benefits for licking stamps from 9-5, unlike many other vocations contributing to society that get nothing.
Report this