|
|||
|
The Job Market Takes a Snow DayPosted on Feb 4, 2011
Bad weather put a damper on hiring in January as the U.S. economy added just 36,000 jobs. Still, the unemployment rate dropped to 9 percent from December’s 9.4 percent, but that may be because many job-seekers simply gave up looking. —JCL
Advertisement Previous item: Pakistani Politician Ends Bid to Change Blasphemy Laws Next item: Danish Cartoonist's Attacker Gets 9 Years New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By surfnow, February 7, 2011 at 8:10 am Link to this comment
Total BLS propaganda. It wouldn’t have mattered if it had been 70 degrees from Maine to California all through January, the unemployment is the worst kind- structural- and that ain’t going away with the warmer weather.
Report thisBy TheBrix57, February 5, 2011 at 10:24 am Link to this comment
Quite funny when the statistical numbers don’t add up and everyone is scratching their heads wondering why?
The official unemployment rate is derived from the numbers of people filing for and receiving government benefits for help with their loss of employment, for a set number of weeks. As one can see, there are many problems with this number as the requirements are inclusive. Remove one of the requirements and a person is no longer counted.
For years upon years this was how the unemployment rate worked and there was never any need to change it, because it was close to being real. Today, we are finding that this official number is off greatly due to the fact that one or two of those requirements are not being met. One is the number of weeks allowed is not able to sustain those unemployed. There is not a continuity from one program to another, as there may be a gap of weeks. Part-time work knocks a person off being counted. Delays in reporting may be another.
Perhaps, it is time to take another look at the U-3 report that makes it the official number of the unemployed in America. Perhaps using the U-6 buried a little further down the table and containing more guesswork. Something does need to be done instead of ignoring those unemployed and underemployed and hoping they go away.
Report this