LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     gay marriage     barack obama     chris hedges     ndaa     robert scheer
Most Read

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Truthdiggers of the Week: 400,000 Canadians Launching the ‘Maple Spring’

Russia and Exxon Mobil Sign Arctic Oil Deal

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Ukraine Wants to Store N-Waste Near Water Supply

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Apr 30, 2011
Flickr / Pedro Moura Pinheiro

Rusting mailboxes sit in an abandoned apartment building in Pripyat, a ghost town near the Chernobyl nuclear plant.

Ukrainian authorities have made plans to store a portion of the country’s nuclear waste at the site of the 1986 Chernobyl catastrophe, near the region’s major water supply.

For 25 years, the radioactive waste has been sealed by a concrete structure known as a “sarcophagus,” which is now vulnerable to collapse, experts say. —ARK

IPS:

“Chernobyl is still one of the most dangerous nuclear facilities in the world,” Arthur Denisnko, energy expert at the National Ecological Centre of Ukraine told IPS. “The existing confinement is unstable and was built 25 years ago in a rush. If the structure collapses, radioactive dust would be released.”

... Ukrainian authorities may even be increasing risks to the Chernobyl region itself by planning the construction of a central nuclear waste storage facility there.

The location is justified by the virtual absence of population in the area, but it runs counter to plans to revitalise the region, and ignores the risks involved in locating the facility in the proximity of the Dnipro river, which supplies water to 70 percent of Ukrainians.

About 150 tons of spent nuclear fuel are annually produced in Ukraine and, while several experts claim this fuel has potential for re-usage in new generation reactors, the construction of such reactors is yet unheard of worldwide.

For radioactive waste, which is accumulating in almost all Ukrainian nuclear power plants, there is also no solution in sight, a problem that is not unique to Ukraine.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By Jim Yell, May 1, 2011 at 8:36 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It is all over except the crying, if anyone survives to cry. How ignorant and pig headed does one have to be to put a substance that is guaranteed to seep out into the environment right on your water supply?

It is surprising that techno nerds keep pushing nuclear energy on the vague idea that we will find a way to neutralize it in the future.

Once more just because you usually can’t see the pollution, it doesn’t mean nuclear is clean energy. Just because some jacksas declares the storage facilities they build are safe, doesn’t mean they are safe.

Nukes must be stopped both as weapons and as energy producers. The problem is the direction we are going with them may make the future meaningless.

Report this

By TDoff, April 30, 2011 at 4:28 pm Link to this comment

This may not be as crazy as it sounds. Perhaps the Ukrainians have taken a hard, realistic look at themselves and realized that any folks who would consider planning million-year storage of nuclear waste near the main source of their water supply are seriously defective.
On that basis, they may be going ahead with the plan with the hope, and the gamble, that the increased number, rate, and complexity of mutations that will occur in their populace will create folks that are far more intelligent than the ones which are making this move.

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.