LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 22, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Lock Up Washington

Rise Up or Die

Revenge of the Bear: Russia Strikes Back in Syria

California Man Sues Officers He Says Nearly Beat Him to Death

How America Became a Third World Country: 2013-2023

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Glaciers Are Melting Slowly but Surely
 * NEW! * How America Became a Third World Country: 2013-2023
 * NEW! * Lock Up Washington
Too Soon to Tell: The Case for Hope, Continued

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar

Our Daily Bread

By Lauren B. Davis

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Time Magazine Puts Contrarian Spin on Spill

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jul 29, 2010
ENTER_ALT_TEXT
International Bird Rescue Research Center / WikiCommons

Technicians clean an oil-soaked baby brown pelican at the Fort Jackson Bird Rehabilitation Center in Buras, La.

Relying primarily on a controversial Louisiana expert with previous ties to BP but also quoting a leader of the Audubon Society, Time magazine has posted a contrarian report arguing that the environmental damage of the Deepwater Horizon disaster has been overblown. The thesis is primarily that the coastline has been spared the level of damage the Exxon Valdez wrought on Alaska, and that the ongoing loss of wetlands because of changes to the Mississippi River are a bigger deal. The reporter defends his controversial sources as having been right earlier in challenging the official story of the flooding of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina.

Time.com:

Marine scientist Ivor Van Heerden, another former LSU prof who’s working for a spill response contractor, says “there’s just no data to suggest this is an environmental disaster. I have no interest in making BP look good — I think they lied about the size of the spill — but we’re not seeing catastrophic impacts,” says Van Heerden, who, like just about everyone else working in the Gulf these days, is being paid out of BP’s spill response funds. “There’s a lot of hype, but no evidence to justify it.”

The scientists I spoke with cite four basic reasons the initial eco-fears seem overblown. First, the Deepwater Horizon oil, unlike the black glop from the Valdez, is comparatively light and degradable, which is why the slick in the Gulf is dissolving surprisingly rapidly now that the gusher has been capped. Second, the Gulf of Mexico, unlike Prince William Sound, is balmy at more than 85 degrees, which also helps bacteria break down oil. Third, heavy flows of Mississippi River water helped keep the oil away from the coast, where it can do much more damage. Finally, Mother Nature can be incredibly resilient.

Read more

 

 

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By carl mcgarry, July 30, 2010 at 7:27 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

who reads Time anyway?

Report this

By Jim Yell, July 30, 2010 at 6:48 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

His words are suspect, because they make no sense.

It is the invisible, elements of this pollution which will be the most dangerous in the long term, although the visible components have certainly raised havoc with sea life.

We can look for increased cancer for one and loss of species for another. The Gulf is poisoned as it has never been before. As BP wants the public to focus on the billions they have place (forced)to help with clean-up they do not wish to be held for the long term consequences. As the large, visible pollutions sink to the bottom, are covered with sand and the chemicals are incorporated into the sea food we eat and then into our own, they do not think they can be held accountable for this. They will spend as much as it takes to distract attention away from their crime.

And, crime it was. Why aren’t they in Jail?

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, July 30, 2010 at 5:52 am Link to this comment

“Van Heerden, who, like just about everyone else working in the Gulf these days, is being paid out of BP’s spill response funds.”

So what’s the implication there? That, if you take BP’s money, you’re in BP’s pocket? That, because he’s being paid by BP, his word is suspect?

Report this

By rollzone, July 29, 2010 at 6:40 pm Link to this comment

hello. Beyond Peons must have picked up TIME at a garage sale. without them paying me, i will state the Deepwater Horizon no longer exists. given enough TIME, the event will no longer exist. hydrogen is clean, safe, abundant energy. we are being charged taxes to pay for half ($10 billion) the damages from (in their minds) a catastrophe that has not occurred, and claims that have no basis in reality. remember, unethical vested interests are lacing carbon credits with oil aid. let’s all have a huge gulp.

Report this

By samosamo, July 29, 2010 at 2:12 pm Link to this comment

****************


Time magazine, what a recalcitrant entity. Would not expect any
member of the mainstream media to do more than grasp at
straws and smoke that will deceive those expecting real
information. Anything for their masters. Time is also a source of
dribble that should at all times set off the skepticism alarms.
Note also how effortlessly Time moulded the information to
‘enhance’ bp’s image.

As its name implies, Time reverts to time so that it will be one of
those created obfuscations to make the other side ‘blink’, create
doubt, simply by saying in the end ‘only time will tell’. Imagine
how much ‘good’ time that will give bp to move on to some
other devious mischief.

Report this

By gerard, July 29, 2010 at 11:44 am Link to this comment

People in general are slow to take an interest in the dangerous results of human degradation of the earth. Yet there is considerable evidence of grave danger if this degradation continues.
  In such a situation (call it mass deliberate ignorance) people who are concerned about continuing degradation are naturally going to view every evidence as a serious offense pointing to ultimate collapse of delicate earth systems.
  One problem is how to obtain and hold mass public awareness of very complicated problems. Another is how to institute necessary changes to stop the degradation.  A third problem is how to get business interests who exploit the environment to stop irresponsible plundering and adopt a more humane and caring attitude of self-control.
  A further complication is that scientific projections indicate that we don’t have much time to do all this. 
  Better an over-concern than the deliberate evasiveness which dominates the picture now.

Report this

By bogi666, July 29, 2010 at 10:48 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Time magazine as a objective authority what a pathetic joke. BP just bribed Time and perhaps even ghost wrote the article for Time to publish to avoid liability. Gimme a break, Time will make BP’s Heywood Man of the Year.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.