|
|
May 22, 2013
|
|
The Union Factor in the DSK CasePosted on May 24, 2011
Would Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s alleged victim have been as quick to tell authorities her story if she hadn’t been a union member? Maybe not, The Guardian’s Dean Baker points out. —KA
Advertisement Previous item: Netanyahu Addresses Congress Next item: Obama and Cameron Take a Page from Reagan and Thatcher New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Dale Lewis, May 24, 2011 at 8:34 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
being in a union is a good thing, right? the purpose of unions is to protect the rights of workers, women cleaning hotel rooms are easy prey, there’s a bed and a locked door, she’s not slinking away and hiding the shame of rape, she knows her union will fight for her, how the (alleged) perpetrator imagines his high-end lawyers are going to get him off is, well…a man thing, a very, very rich and powerful man thing
Report thisBy TDoff, May 24, 2011 at 4:37 pm Link to this comment
Oh, this story is about the rapee being in a union. I thought it was going to expose that DSK was the leader, known as ‘The Head Dicker’, of the IMF Executives’ Rapist Union.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, May 24, 2011 at 3:52 pm Link to this comment
The entire exercise of this article was place the words ‘DSK’ and ‘Unions’ in the same sentence.
Report this