|
|||
|
The Union Factor in the DSK CasePosted on May 24, 2011
Would Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s alleged victim have been as quick to tell authorities her story if she hadn’t been a union member? Maybe not, The Guardian’s Dean Baker points out. —KA
Advertisement Previous item: Netanyahu Addresses Congress Next item: Obama and Cameron Take a Page from Reagan and Thatcher New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By Dale Lewis, May 24, 2011 at 7:34 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
being in a union is a good thing, right? the purpose of unions is to protect the rights of workers, women cleaning hotel rooms are easy prey, there’s a bed and a locked door, she’s not slinking away and hiding the shame of rape, she knows her union will fight for her, how the (alleged) perpetrator imagines his high-end lawyers are going to get him off is, well…a man thing, a very, very rich and powerful man thing
Report thisBy TDoff, May 24, 2011 at 3:37 pm Link to this comment
Oh, this story is about the rapee being in a union. I thought it was going to expose that DSK was the leader, known as ‘The Head Dicker’, of the IMF Executives’ Rapist Union.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, May 24, 2011 at 2:52 pm Link to this comment
The entire exercise of this article was place the words ‘DSK’ and ‘Unions’ in the same sentence.
Report this