Top Leaderboard, Site wide
August 21, 2014
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Help us grow by sharing
and liking Truthdig:
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Newsletter

sign up to get updates






American Catch


Truthdig Bazaar
The End of Faith

The End of Faith

Sam Harris
$19.74

Shi’ism and Social Protest

Shi’ism and Social Protest

by Juan Cole and Nikki Keddie
$30.60

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

The Rigged Game of Climate Talks

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Dec 3, 2010
unfairplay.info

The nonprofit responsible for the report is UNfairplay, a group that fights for the Third World in U.N. climate talks.

An NGO report has found that key U.N. climate negotiations are institutionally biased against poorer nations, specifically that underdeveloped countries are less able to send delegates to meetings and often cannot understand what is being discussed at the talks. —JCL

The Guardian:

The UN climate negotiations are weighted heavily against the poorest countries, who cannot send delegates to key meetings, often do not understand what is being said and are unable keep up with the decisions being taken in their name, a report by an NGO that promotes fairness in the negotiations has found.

While rich countries have sent more than 150 delegates each to Cancún, more than half of the countries in the world have fewer than five representatives, with 26 countries having only one or two. For every 100m people living in Africa there are three negotiators—the equivalent figure for the EU is 6.4.

According to the report, based on research by campaign group UNfairplay, countries must be at as many as six meetings at the same time to follow the talks which are “cryptic”, “untransparent” and “opaque”.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, December 4, 2010 at 3:57 pm Link to this comment

gerard:

Well, I don’t know. Unlike you, I don’t know much. That’s why I ask so many stupid questions. I’m only saying that td needs to sell advertising to stay online. They obviously aren’t picky about who wants to buy it.

Report this

By gerard, December 4, 2010 at 2:42 pm Link to this comment

But rico—there is something else to consider:

Are we (you) lagging in contributions to TD that might prevent the necessity of financing via ads?

Or has TD overlooked other possibilities for helping to finance the site?

Of course it’s easy to overlook very real possibilities—and do whatever is easiest. But the fact is that the bills, whatever they are, have to be paid.  Under our beloved capitalism, that is. Or is there a slush fund for “leftish” political blogs somewhere?

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, December 4, 2010 at 9:34 am Link to this comment

gerard:

Tells you that td is like every other publications-  whores for ad money.

Report this

By gerard, December 4, 2010 at 12:09 am Link to this comment

Well, I sure hate to see that ad for permit to carry concealed weapons on Truthdig?  Tells you something—but what?

Report this

By gerard, December 3, 2010 at 11:12 pm Link to this comment

From Mother Jones—“Wikileaks: US Manipulated Climate Agreement” by Damian Carrigan, 12/3/10 “Hidden behind the save-the-world rhetoric of the global climate change negotiations lies the mucky realpolitik: money and threats buy political support; spying and cyberwarfare are used to seek out leverage. 
  “The US diplomatic cables reveal how the US seeks dirt on nations opposed to its approach to tackling global warming; how financial and other aid is used by countries to gain political backing; how distrust, broken promises and creative accounting dog negotiations; and how the US mounted a secret global diplomatic offensive to overwhelm opposition to the controversial “Copenhagen accord”, the unofficial document that emerged from the ruins of the Copenhagen climate change summit in 2009.
  “Negotiating a climate treaty is a high-stakes game, not just because of the danger warming poses to civilisation but also because re-engineering the global economy to a low-carbon model will see the flow of billions of dollars redirected.
Seeking negotiating chips, the US state department sent a secret cable on 31 July 2009 seeking human intelligence from UN diplomats across a range of issues, including climate change. The request originated with the CIA. As well as countries’ negotiating positions for Copenhagen, diplomats were asked to provide evidence of UN environmental"treaty circumvention” and deals between nations.
  “But intelligence gathering was not just one way. On 19 June 2009, the state department sent a cable detailing a “spear phishing” attack on the office of the US climate change envoy, Todd Stern, while talks with China on emissions took place in Beijing. Five people received emails, personalised to look as though they came from the National Journal. An attached file contained malicious code that would give complete control of the recipient’s computer to a hacker. While the attack was unsuccessful, the department’s cyber threat analysis division noted: ‘It is probable intrusion attempts such as this will persist.’”

Shows clearly what “third world” countries are up against.  Be sure to watch Amy Goodman’s programs during the coming “climate summit.”

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, December 3, 2010 at 10:41 pm Link to this comment

“While rich countries have sent more than 150 delegates each to Cancún” (!!!!)

Tough duty I must say.

Report this

By Jo, December 3, 2010 at 3:41 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

And this is surprising? The stacks are against poor
nations yet they are the ones suffering the most due to
bad policies but we continue to blame it on bad
dictators. One word “Copenhagen”, see how that turned
out? For the west, it was a success but for the poorer
nations…they’re still suffering the effects of
climate change.

Report this
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.