Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
June 19, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     nsa     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Reporter Who Brought Down the 'Runaway General' Dead at 33

The Terror Con

The U.S. Military and the Unraveling of Africa

Greenland's Great Melt Is Pinned on Climate Change

Nate Silver vs. Politico: It's on Again

Most Comments
Most Emailed

 * NEW! * Greenland’s Great Melt Is Pinned on Climate Change



The Unwinding


Truthdig Bazaar
The Impeachment of George W. Bush

The Impeachment of George W. Bush

By Elizabeth Holtzman and Cynthia L. Cooper
$10.17

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

The Politics of Mourning

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Apr 23, 2007

Why did we lower flags to half-mast for students and faculty killed in the Virginia Tech shootings but do not do the same for our fallen soldiers in the Middle East?  That’s the provocative question posed by Sgt. Jim Wilt from his Army outpost near Kabul, Afghanistan. 


AP via Yahoo!  News:

In the article issued Monday by the public affairs office at Bagram military base north of Kabul, Sgt. Jim Wilt lamented that his comrades’ deaths have become a mere blip on the TV screen, lacking the “shock factor” to be honored by the Stars and Stripes as the deaths at Virginia Tech were.

“I find it ironic that the flags were flown at half-staff for the young men and women who were killed at VT, yet it is never lowered for the death of a U.S. service member,” Wilt wrote.

He noted that Bagram obeyed President Bush’s order last week that all U.S. flags at federal locations be flown at half-staff through April 22 to honor 32 people killed at Virginia Tech by a 23-year-old student gunman who then killed himself.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By JNagarya, April 24, 2007 at 7:39 pm Link to this comment

#66042 by AnnaCatherine on 4/24 at 7:49 am
(Unregistered commenter)

Americans like sybolism. The flag fying at half staff is a form of recognition. It was the right thing to do.Comparing deaths at VT with our military dying in Iraq is a mistake. The fact is that 32 at VT vs. 3300+ in Iraq attracts a bigger audience. That is tragic. I can’t blame the military families for being offended.

USians like to give the impression, by the least convenient means, that they give a damn.  Magnetic yellow ribbons on their car—which they got at a sufficently low price to make it worth the price to avoid being asked to actually think about the realities and issues.

Flying the flag at half-mast for one group, but not for another.  Parading and singing “God Bless America” in honor of the dead, instead of stepping out of that rote performance of authoritarian conformism into thinking. 

Let’s look to the nearest “Dear Leader” for “leadership”—what to believe, what to parrot, what feelings to feel, while mistakenly assuming that is instead thinking.  Let’s imitate others, conform.

Let’s not make waves, else we be engaged and uninvisible.  Let’s affirm the _status quo_.  Let’s place all blame and responsibility on the killer, and his victims.  Let’s fall unquestioningly for a heinous lie which justifies for us the unnecessary killing of innocents, so long as it is the result of and for “free enterprise,” and so long as those innocents are not us.

Report this

By AnnaCatherine, April 24, 2007 at 8:49 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Americans like sybolism. The flag fying at half staff is a form of recognition. It was the right thing to do.Comparing deaths at VT with our military dying in Iraq is a mistake. The fact is that 32 at VT vs. 3300+ in Iraq attracts a bigger audience. That is tragic. I can’t blame the military families for being offended.

Report this

By JNagarya, April 24, 2007 at 7:38 am Link to this comment

#65933 by Steve Hammons on 4/23 at 6:07 pm
(33 comments total)

Sgt. Wilt asks a good question. My answer, for what it’s worth: The Bush-Cheney bunch don’t care about the troops and never have.

They spout patriotic-sounding sound-bites about the troops, but they could care less about the troops and their families.

The Bush-Cheney administration, their associates and followers are chicken hawks of the worst kind. They lack the honor of most of our military personnel.

Thoughts on this:

“Victory of Courage, Fellowship and Honor”

Where is the media on the issue?  Why are they not stationed at Dover where the coffins come in, and demanding their questions be answered concerning that scandalous abuse of those killed by Bush’s guns.

Why no half-mast for Walter Reed residents?  Or even for the facility itself?

Report this

By Hank Van den Berg, April 24, 2007 at 7:36 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Lowering the flag for our dead soldiers is clearly appropriate, but let’s not forget that there are several VTU-like events in Iraq every day!  Get a grip, America, the VTU massacre pales next to what we have perpetrated in Iraq.  Instead of dealing with our country’s biggest and most immediate failure, we prefer to go through elaborate mourning rituals in which we get to enjoy the emotional high of victimhood while we all naively ask “why?”  Yet, every day we observe the consequences of our vengeful and irresponsible war on Iraq, but we continue to deny the obvious fact that we are the cause of it.  It is hard to say whether we are the most ignorant or the most arrogant of people.  We only deny the whole mess we have caused by engaging in mass mournings for the victims of the awfaul VTU massacre.  And now we are being asked to lower the flag for our soldiers killed in Iraq, which still avoids the real issue of our international aggression.  Wouldn’t it be more useful to lower the flag for the true victimes of the daily VTU-like massacres we have brought to Iraq?  Of course, we would have to admit our guilt and change the way we bahave as a country.  I am not sure we are capable of that; we seem to prefer rituals like lowering flags and cluelessly sitting around asking how it is possible that such bad things happen to us!

Report this

By James Yell, April 24, 2007 at 7:02 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

A little late to ask this question. From the very beginning of the Bush/Cheney lies, part of the scam was to sneak the dead US soldiers back into the country with as little acknowledgement as they could.

When an administration is run solely on PR, negative facts and visions are not allowed, even for view by our supposed President “Frat Brat”. The visions might actually touch any humanity his arrogance hasn’t removed from his heart. President “I won’t go to Vietnam, but now that I am too old to be asked, I will send thousands to an un-necessary War, ruin their lives and create chaos because Jesus told me so”.

Report this

By Jaded Prole, April 24, 2007 at 6:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The latest example of Hokie Journalism is one of avoidance of uncomfortable news regarding events in which the media has been complicit. Better to focus incessantly on the tragedy at Virginai Tech than the much larger and more criminal tragedy in Iraq.

We should keep our flags at half staff until this administration is removed and the troops return.

Report this

By ChicagoGuy, April 24, 2007 at 6:23 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Americans should take the initiative and lower the flag to half-mast every time it is reported one of our military has given their life in support of our country. Sgt. Wilt is totally correct when he states that our troops who died should be given the same respect as others who gave their life. Afterall, is it not our troops who put their lives on the line in support of this same flag?

Report this

By ann, April 24, 2007 at 6:19 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

In early March I began asking Jim Webb and John Warner to ask that our flags be lowered to half-mast until all our service men and women return from Iraq and Afghanistan.  I’ve written to each of them 3 times, once by snail mail.  Know what?  I’ve never gotten any response or even an acknowledgement from either of these elected officials.  And I sent the same email to Pelosi on March 1…nothing from her either.

Report this
RAE's avatar

By RAE, April 23, 2007 at 11:16 pm Link to this comment

If flags were lowered for every American “fallen soldier” it would only remind the American public of how costly their folly in far-off lands.

The last thing the government wants is to signal their failures, one by one, for all to see. Flags would rarely ever make it to the top of the flagpoles. America… the Land in Perpetual Mourning.

It’s sad the cause of their suffering is their twisted assumptions about their role in the international community.

Report this

By Lynn Hauka, April 23, 2007 at 10:48 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

CNN ran a headline that read something like “Promising Young Lives Cut Short Too Soon”.

I too wondered why they don’t apply that same standard to those killed in Iraq and Afghanistan.

How many exceptional young men and women have died for Bush’s ego and US oil interests? And how many more will have to, before this madness is over?

Report this

By Bob Zimmerman, April 23, 2007 at 10:12 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Rosie O’Donnell also observed this mourning oddity on her “View” program last week. This administration doesn’t want any more reminders about the absurdity of this war, and the unnecessary sacrifices of our courageous troops. They don’t want coffins to be shown coming off aircraft, and they tightly “manage” the news coming out of Iraq. Nine more soldiers died today and more will die as we extend tours of duty to 15 months, and cut short the time away from the front lines. So much for supporting the troops. We just have to wonder how much more damage this administration will cause in their time left in office.

Report this

By Clay Blasdel, April 23, 2007 at 8:03 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

good point, Sgt. Witt.

I think the Commander in Chief was AWOL many years ago and the more that his conscience bothers him - lamenting his own cowardice and not living up to his old man - the more he talks toughs and hangs out with the troops.  He’s all title and brass. But no guts. And he knows it.

So….when in doubt, talk tough and send other to die.

Report this

By Hammo, April 23, 2007 at 7:07 pm Link to this comment

Sgt. Wilt asks a good question. My answer, for what it’s worth: The Bush-Cheney bunch don’t care about the troops and never have.

They spout patriotic-sounding sound-bites about the troops, but they could care less about the troops and their families.

The Bush-Cheney administration, their associates and followers are chicken hawks of the worst kind. They lack the honor of most of our military personnel.

Thoughts on this:

“Victory of Courage, Fellowship and Honor”

PopulistAmerica.com
Populist Party of America
December 17, 2006

http://www.populistamerica.com/victory_of_courage_fellowship_and_honor

-  -  -

“Chicken hawks are real and dangerous”

PopulistAmerica.com
Populist Party of America
November 26, 2006

http://www.populistamerica.com/chicken_hawks_are_real_and_dangerous

Report this

By QuyTran, April 23, 2007 at 6:09 pm Link to this comment

Why ? Because troops don’t give enough votes for his damned party while the families of VT’s massacre do.

How many times do Bush/Cheney salute the coffins of our troops died from battle fields ? Almost none !

This was a son of the bitch game of politics !

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.