|
|||
|
Medical Research: Seeking a Better ReturnPosted on Jun 20, 2011
Critics of the National Institutes of Health argue that the $30 billion the government pours into medical research and innovation through the organization each year is not making Americans healthier. While the U.S. spends more of its GDP on medical services than any other country, it ranks miserably low compared with other nations in terms of life expectancy and other health care standards. We can do better, says Michael M. Crow, president of Arizona State University and former professor of science policy at Columbia University. How? By restructuring the NIH to shift its overriding objective from advances in medical research to the actual improvement of people’s health through investments in collaborative, multidisciplinary programs designed to change behavior. Of course, entrenched critics who deem such efforts to be “too complex and politically impractical,” as Crow writes, must be overcome. —ARK
Advertisement New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By Travel Insurance USA, April 26 at 12:36 am Link to this comment
If all insurance companies had the same noble goal like the NIH of actually wanting to improve lives and reducing the burdens of the ill and needy, perhaps their reputation would not be so bad. It is important that the funding given to the NIH for research and development be used so that they can reach this goal.
Report thisBy Matthew - Promotional Products, January 8 at 7:13 pm Link to this comment
I feel that many of the investments in medical research and healthcare do not end up in the places where patients stand to benefit the most. Like the article said, America is the leader in biomedical science, and biomedical science does not equate to health. Due to the profit driven nature of the health industry, many discoveries also end up too expensive for the masses to enjoy too.
Report thisBy SarcastiCanuck, June 21, 2011 at 5:29 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Take the 30 billion and buy all the all you can eat buffets in America and close them down.Then you’ll see the health rates go up…
Report thisBy berniem, June 20, 2011 at 3:14 pm Link to this comment
What do you expect when all of that work is turned over to a for-profit racket and predatory insurance companies?
Report thisBy jr., June 20, 2011 at 9:45 am Link to this comment
FOOD FOR THOUGHT
http://rt.com/usa/news/deadly-coli-strain-adams/
Report this