LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     gay marriage     barack obama     ndaa     robert scheer     chris hedges
Most Read

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Truthdiggers of the Week: 400,000 Canadians Launching the ‘Maple Spring’

Russia and Exxon Mobil Sign Arctic Oil Deal

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
Last Dance in Havana

Last Dance in Havana

By Eugene Robinson
$19.95

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Medical Research: Seeking a Better Return

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Jun 20, 2011
Flickr / Lori Greig

Critics of the National Institutes of Health argue that the $30 billion the government pours into medical research and innovation through the organization each year is not making Americans healthier. While the U.S. spends more of its GDP on medical services than any other country, it ranks miserably low compared with other nations in terms of life expectancy and other health care standards.

We can do better, says Michael M. Crow, president of Arizona State University and former professor of science policy at Columbia University. How? By restructuring the NIH to shift its overriding objective from advances in medical research to the actual improvement of people’s health through investments in collaborative, multidisciplinary programs designed to change behavior. Of course, entrenched critics who deem such efforts to be “too complex and politically impractical,” as Crow writes, must be overcome. —ARK

The Boston Globe:

The United States spends around $30 billion a year on the National Institutes of Health, an agency that has been called the “jewel in the crown of the federal government.” The NIH is by far the nation’s most important single funder of medical research—the scientific work that drives our university labs, our drug companies, and our major hospitals—and its budget amounts to an enormous bet that by advancing basic medical science, we can reap improvements in national health care.

In one arena, at least, that bet is paying off: America has become the unquestioned global leader in biomedical science. As it has, the NIH has also become critically important to states like Massachusetts, which reaped more than $2 billion in funding last year, fueling a high-tech economy of high-paying jobs.

But biomedical science is not the same thing as health, and in a very important sense, our investment in the NIH is not fully paying off. The agency’s own mission statement holds that its ultimate goal is applying knowledge to “enhance health, lengthen life, and reduce the burdens of illness and disability.” And on that count, America is doing less impressively.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By Travel Insurance USA, April 26 at 12:36 am Link to this comment

If all insurance companies had the same noble goal like the NIH of actually wanting to improve lives and reducing the burdens of the ill and needy, perhaps their reputation would not be so bad. It is important that the funding given to the NIH for research and development be used so that they can reach this goal.

Report this

By Matthew - Promotional Products, January 8 at 7:13 pm Link to this comment

I feel that many of the investments in medical research and healthcare do not end up in the places where patients stand to benefit the most. Like the article said, America is the leader in biomedical science, and biomedical science does not equate to health. Due to the profit driven nature of the health industry, many discoveries also end up too expensive for the masses to enjoy too.

Report this

By SarcastiCanuck, June 21, 2011 at 5:29 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Take the 30 billion and buy all the all you can eat buffets in America and close them down.Then you’ll see the health rates go up…

Report this

By berniem, June 20, 2011 at 3:14 pm Link to this comment

What do you expect when all of that work is turned over to a for-profit racket and predatory insurance companies?

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.