Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
Top Banner, Site wide
Apr 16, 2014

 Choose a size
Text Size

Top Leaderboard, Site wide

Jeb Bush’s Optimism School
Climate Costs ‘May Prove Much Higher’




Paul Robeson: A Life


Truthdig Bazaar
Risk, Ambiguity and Decision

Risk, Ambiguity and Decision

By Daniel Ellsberg
$101.79

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Medical Research: Seeking a Better Return

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jun 20, 2011
Flickr / Lori Greig

Critics of the National Institutes of Health argue that the $30 billion the government pours into medical research and innovation through the organization each year is not making Americans healthier. While the U.S. spends more of its GDP on medical services than any other country, it ranks miserably low compared with other nations in terms of life expectancy and other health care standards.

We can do better, says Michael M. Crow, president of Arizona State University and former professor of science policy at Columbia University. How? By restructuring the NIH to shift its overriding objective from advances in medical research to the actual improvement of people’s health through investments in collaborative, multidisciplinary programs designed to change behavior. Of course, entrenched critics who deem such efforts to be “too complex and politically impractical,” as Crow writes, must be overcome. —ARK

The Boston Globe:

The United States spends around $30 billion a year on the National Institutes of Health, an agency that has been called the “jewel in the crown of the federal government.” The NIH is by far the nation’s most important single funder of medical research—the scientific work that drives our university labs, our drug companies, and our major hospitals—and its budget amounts to an enormous bet that by advancing basic medical science, we can reap improvements in national health care.

In one arena, at least, that bet is paying off: America has become the unquestioned global leader in biomedical science. As it has, the NIH has also become critically important to states like Massachusetts, which reaped more than $2 billion in funding last year, fueling a high-tech economy of high-paying jobs.

But biomedical science is not the same thing as health, and in a very important sense, our investment in the NIH is not fully paying off. The agency’s own mission statement holds that its ultimate goal is applying knowledge to “enhance health, lengthen life, and reduce the burdens of illness and disability.” And on that count, America is doing less impressively.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Travel Insurance USA, April 26, 2012 at 1:36 am Link to this comment

If all insurance companies had the same noble goal like the NIH of actually wanting to improve lives and reducing the burdens of the ill and needy, perhaps their reputation would not be so bad. It is important that the funding given to the NIH for research and development be used so that they can reach this goal.

Report this

By Matthew - Promotional Products, January 8, 2012 at 8:13 pm Link to this comment

I feel that many of the investments in medical research and healthcare do not end up in the places where patients stand to benefit the most. Like the article said, America is the leader in biomedical science, and biomedical science does not equate to health. Due to the profit driven nature of the health industry, many discoveries also end up too expensive for the masses to enjoy too.

Report this

By SarcastiCanuck, June 21, 2011 at 6:29 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Take the 30 billion and buy all the all you can eat buffets in America and close them down.Then you’ll see the health rates go up…

Report this

By berniem, June 20, 2011 at 4:14 pm Link to this comment

What do you expect when all of that work is turned over to a for-profit racket and predatory insurance companies?

Report this

By jr., June 20, 2011 at 10:45 am Link to this comment

FOOD FOR THOUGHT

http://rt.com/usa/news/deadly-coli-strain-adams/

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.