|
|
May 24, 2013
|
|
The Keystone XL Media BiasPosted on Jan 28, 2012
Media Matters turned its bias detectors on the corporate media’s coverage of the Keystone XL pipeline, a proposed $7 billion Canada-to-Texas oil way that the Obama administration put on hold last week. The analysis found that in all mediums, pipeline supporters got more talk time than their opponents, and counted the ways reporters parroted industry’s talking points. Click through to the full report after reading the opening statement below. —ARK
Advertisement Previous item: Google Exec Knows About Unemployment Next item: Journalists, Cop Arrested in U.K. Corruption Investigation New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By grokker, January 29, 2012 at 4:24 pm Link to this comment
@Hurtin Albertan The pipeline in question has no chance in hell of relieving U.S. dependence on foreign oil. Nor do discoveries in North Dakota, Alaska or the Gulf of Mexico. You only have to compare U.S yearly consumption with the maximum that these sites would possibly someday produce, and in some cases we as Americans would burn through that oil in four to five years and at what cost? There is so much propaganda regarding the bright future that these discoveries could bring to America, but if you dig deeper, all of the bullshit is about attracting investors, suckers like you and me. No thanks. One other matter concerning the sludge you would love to send through the guts of our nation. This pipeline would be made from cheap Chinese steel (irony). The sludge running through it was described by one industry analyst as being like sandpaper scraping the inside of these pipes. Check Greg Palast’s investigation of the known faulty software in the pipeline safety equipment.
http://www.gregpalast.com/the-pig-in-the-xl-pipelineinsider-reveals-concealed-“error”in-pipeline-safety-equipment-that-could-blow-away-the-gop’s-xl-pipe-dream/
Report thisBy OzarkMichael, January 29, 2012 at 4:10 pm Link to this comment
a fairly good question, grokker, and a good observation.
Report thisBy grokker, January 29, 2012 at 4:01 pm Link to this comment
@OzarkMichael Why don’t we laugh 3 times. One at you as well. Where are your figures on this? Can you refute this without quoting pipeline industry sources. I suppose you think we have a “liberal” media in this country as well. One of “those” guys….
Report thisBy OzarkMichael, January 29, 2012 at 1:00 pm Link to this comment
Lets get this straight: Media Matters is not a neutral watchdog.
So when Truthdig quotes Media Matters about bias one ought to laugh twice. Once for Media Matters and once for Truthdig.
Report thisBy berniem, January 29, 2012 at 11:19 am Link to this comment
As Gomer would say…“surprise, surprise, surprise!” FREE BRADLEY MANNING!!!!
Report thisBy they call me the working man, January 29, 2012 at 1:36 am Link to this comment
Considering the info one can find by simply searching the net on this pipeline this is basically a fluff piece pretending not to be a fluff piece. Clickdig might be a more appropriate name.
Report thisBy Hurtin Albertan, January 28, 2012 at 10:09 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Peter Knofler: I disagree that the pipeline will hurt natives. It empowers natives and others. The oilsands are the leading employer of Indians in Canada. Billions of dollars wages are paid and contracts are given to natives in the oilsands region. One band, the Fort McKay Band, are sitting on 500 million barrels and will do a joint venture with a company to get it out. The band numbers about 700 so that means about 700 thousand barrels each. Royalty would’ve given them 12%. Joint venture might do 20% for them. Let’s see 700 thousand barrels at $100 times 20%. $14 million for each man woman and child. Could you get by on that?
If you want to see what the oil industry means to the Janvier Cree band search You-tube for ‘Ezra Levant on Greens Keeping down Indians’. You’ll see an interview with Chief Vern Janvier in which he describes his bands contracts which bring in $50 million from oil cos and the joint ventures they get into do $100 million per year. Not too bad for a reserve with only 180 members don’t you think?
Folks in the US will benefit as well. Long term. The state of Montana says it will get $63 million in property taxes per year from Keystone XL for its 281 mile stretch of line. In a state with an ave household income of $35 thousand this would equate to 1800 households supported. Plus an onramp for Montana and N Dakota Bakken production will take about 100 thousand bpd from them and so more jobs will be produced there.
Lots of reward. Little risk. But some in the native community want a risk free pipeline. Nothing in life is risk free. But Canadian bands live in third world conditions in many areas. They are currently under great personal risk just in their everyday lives: poverty, 80% unemployment, poor water, poor housing, higher rates of suicide, crime, family violence, addiction, incarceration. Diseases like TB that are rarely heard of in the outside community occur on the reserves. They’re leading high risk lives but demand a no risk pipeline. The line could help them out of poverty and improve their lives through the prosperity from development. Not by itself but it would help. Unfortunately certain enviro groups, many foreign, have convinced than to reject prosperity at minimal risk and embrace their current squalor. Sad.
Report thisBy Peter Knopfler, January 28, 2012 at 3:20 pm Link to this comment
CANADA`S SINS COMING TO AMERICA: LETS GET REAL.
Report thisAMERICAN INDIAN AND CANADA HAVE SAME HIDDEN GENOCIDE,
AND NOW THE PIPELINE RUNS RIGHT THROUGH INDIAN LANDS
TRAIL OFF TEARS ONCE MORE SHAME IS HOW I SEE THIS EYES
OF SHAME!