|
|||
|
The Internet Fights BackPosted on Jan 17, 2012
To protest two pieces of legislation that threaten the free and open Internet as we know it, thousands of websites, including Wikipedia, are taking themselves offline. Others, including Google, are asking users to take action. Google and Wikipedia are the first and sixth most-trafficked sites in the world, respectively, according to Alexa. The sites are protesting the Stop Online Piracy Act and the Protect IP Act, because, in the words of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, “they would hamper innovation, kill jobs, wreak havoc on Internet security, and undermine the free speech principles upon which our country was founded.”
The Wikipedia blackout will last from midnight Wednesday until midnight Thursday, and affects only the English-language site. A statement on Wikipedia says that the decision “was made by Wikipedia’s global community of editors—the people who built Wikipedia” and supported by the Wikimedia Foundation. Google has not closed its site for business, but the world’s busiest page now bears a blacked-out logo. Clicking on it will take you to an advocacy page that invites users to sign a petition denouncing SOPA and PIPA. Anyone who wants to know how their elected officials are coming down on the bills should check out this handy guide. Below, Amy Goodman speaks with Corynne McSherry of the Electronic Frontier Foundation about the legislation. —PZS
Advertisement Previous item: Recovery Drags as Americans Dip Into Savings Next item: London High Court Tells Occupiers to Get Out New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By heterochromatic, February 29 at 7:31 am Link to this comment
Jim Eff- if it’s a free place, why would you think it’s private or that you have real
privacy in it?
Anonymous and WikiLeaks are proof that you do not.
Report thisBy Jim Effect, February 29 at 12:57 am Link to this comment
If I am not wrong, the hacker group known as Anonymous had also dedicated itself to taking down several government servers to make their stand against these two legislations. I think the internet is a free place and nobody should try to invade on our privacy this way.
Report thisBy OnePost, January 18 at 10:59 pm Link to this comment
The only thing that will change is how things are shared.
As long as you can still buy material in stores and there are ‘programmers’, things will move.
Regardless of law and punishment.
You can’t have everyone, worldwide, in the jail system.
What they need to do is ban technology. We need all be Amish.
Report thisBy heterochromatic, January 18 at 10:35 pm Link to this comment
good fight and likely to be won…. for the nonce.
Report thisBy Sandy Berman, January 18 at 6:24 pm Link to this comment
When the “free flow of information” involves STOLEN content, free speech no
longer applies.
By that logic, it’s “free speech” to shout “fire” in a crowded theater, or to
publish the most sensitive information that can be stolen from the defense
department. or even YOUR personal medical records, because once that
information leaves your doctor’s office and heads for the insurance company,
your expectation of privacy is no longer valid. Companies buy and sell that
kind of information on you all the time, and there is NOTHING you can currently
do about it, which I think is wrong.
You should really direct your ire at the people who have made such legislation
necessary in the first place. All those people who shared what didn’t belong to
them with 100,000,000 of their closest friends because they felt like it. As if
stealing somehow empowered them.
There comes a point when if you choose to live by the sword, expect your
Report thisdemise to come the same way. This is a complicated issue, to be sure, but it
can’t be addressed in a just or coherent manner until the theft stops.
By Brett, January 18 at 2:30 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Our Politicians cannot stem the tide of exponential growth in technology- no matter how hard they try. They’ll become more invasive in our lives or recognize how futile their attempts are. This could ignite huge problems however- I think it would produce very tech savvy young people seeking to circumnavigate the dumb politicians. Senator Hatch would blow up your computer without due process if he could:
Report thishttp://www.dethronehatch.com/orrin-hatch-is-no-friend-of-the-internet/
By gerard, January 18 at 1:22 pm Link to this comment
OCCUPY the free and open internet—now and forever!
Report thisIt’s the last best hope for the future of human beings.
By thecrow, January 18 at 7:52 am Link to this comment
No worries at this link. Since the US Government says these hard drives do not exist, any media reporting their existence or purporting to show images of them must be fraudulent and therefore not subject to copyright protection. Right?
http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2010/09/10/ghosts-in-the-machine/
Report thisBy sallysense, January 18 at 6:51 am Link to this comment
have used the following link…
and told my senators and congressman…
Don’t Vote for SOPA and PIPA!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Contents
(the wikipedia page for SOPA still comes up in english…
and the above link comes from the ‘help’ button in the left column there)...
Report thisBy glider, January 18 at 6:32 am Link to this comment
I agree with Big B’s “paranoia”, but at least there are other corporations coincidentally partly on the peoples side. Maybe if they can stir up enough public anger this can be delayed. More likely America will continue on course and die a death of a thousand cuts.
ITW, unfortunately you do not have representatives. You are writing to corporate servants asking them not to serve their clients. They know who butters their bread.
Report thisBy prisnersdilema, January 18 at 6:17 am Link to this comment
The entertainment industry wants your money, and if given their way they will turn the
Internet into little more than an online game.
This eventually will completely kill off the Internet. What would the Internet be like if
every poster on every web site copy righted every thing they posted?
These people are very small minded and greedy….Support Internet freedom, don’t let a
few greedy 1 percenters destroy freedom of speech…
Refuse to buy any media today, turn off the T.V…..protest…protest, protest…
Report thisBy THX 1133, January 18 at 5:32 am Link to this comment
Well, I’ll echo Big B; there’s no good ending to
Report thisthis…
By Big B, January 18 at 5:20 am Link to this comment
I’ll tell you where this is going, but you’re not gonna like it. The internet gets to your homes and phones via a wired and wireless system that is owned almost exclusively by the same large communication companies that own a majority of the entertainment industry.
Hope you all like a copywritten and regulated internet, because it will be here by 2013.
I can’t help but see a parallel between the use of the internet to organize anti corporate and anti government protests around the world and the birth of the “SOPA” monster. But then again, I’m just a paranoid old hippie.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, January 18 at 3:49 am Link to this comment
I have emailed both my senators (Dems) and my congressman (Rep) asking them to vote “NO”. Unfortunately, one of them, Senator Robert Menendez is already on record as a “YES”. He can usually be counted on to do the WRONG thing every time…and I’m a fellow Democrat! The other two have not decided but have both gotten more money from the entertainment industry than the internet industry.
Curiously, these bills seem to have currently bi-partisan support in both Houses, an unusual situation. Of course, most of them have received FAR more money in donations from the entertainment industry (which wants the bill) than from the Internet industry, which opposes it.
Wikipedia is just showing a taste of what freedom-lovers on the internet can do…That and inundating Congresscritters and Senators with email and petitions!
Report thisBy waytoomanybottlesofrum, January 18 at 2:55 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
We’re back in black! It’s good to be back.
Report this