Top Leaderboard, Site wide
July 24, 2014
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Help us grow by sharing
and liking Truthdig:
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Newsletter

sign up to get updates


Win-Win Way to Aid Food Security and Climate




War of the Whales


Truthdig Bazaar
Ulysses

Ulysses

By James Joyce

Creation

Creation

By Gore Vidal
$17.95

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Syria: U.S. Guns, Goggles and Military Intervention All on the Table

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Apr 30, 2013
White House/Pete Souza

Seeking to clarify his “red line” position on the Syrian government’s possible use of chemical weapons, President Obama said Tuesday that he would consider a “range of options,” but he also urged patience.

Chemical weapons were used, Obama said, but, “we don’t know how they were used, when they were used, who used them.” The president had previously suggested that the use of chemical weapons might trigger greater U.S. involvement in Syria’s 3-year-old civil war, which has caused the death of an estimated 70,000 people.

The L.A. Times, citing sources in the administration, reports that retaliatory measures might include shipments of weapons and supplies (such as night-vision goggles) to rebels, or even U.S. military action. Neither the president nor his leakers would commit to any specific plan and it’s clear from Obama’s briefing that the White House wants more time to assess the situation.

The president stressed the importance of international partners in his remarks Tuesday, framing the use of chemical weapons as a problem for the international community, and not just the United States. Obama also said rushing to judgment could cost the support of regional allies.

Although the current president’s rhetoric is vastly more measured, talk of a Baath Party government using weapons of mass destruction as a pretext for military action is eerily reminiscent of George W. Bush’s PR campaign on behalf of the Iraq War.

It’s not entirely clear what Obama wants. The charge of chemical weapons, after all, originates from the White House and Obama’s new secretary of defense. Now the drawer of the “red line” appears to be looking for an eraser. Actually, Obama’s comments on Syria have always been deliberately vague. He said chemical weapons would change his calculus, that the world was watching and that he would hold Syrian President Bashar al-Assad accountable for their use. But he did not, as Sen. John McCain and others beating the drums for war would have you believe, promise an actual invasion.

—Posted by Peter Z. Scheer.

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.