Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
Top Banner, Site wide
Apr 18, 2014

 Choose a size
Text Size

Top Leaderboard, Site wide

On Climate, Business as Usual




The Divide


Truthdig Bazaar
The Republican Playbook

The Republican Playbook

By Andy Borowitz
$16.95

In Katrina’s Wake: Portraits of Loss From an Unnatural Disaster

In Katrina’s Wake: Portraits of Loss From an Unnatural Disaster

By Susan Zakin (Author), Bill McKibben (Author), Chris Jordan (Photographer)

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Syria Agrees to Chemical Weapons Deal, but There’s a Catch or Two

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Sep 10, 2013
Shutterstock photo of toxic waste.

“We want to join the convention on the prohibition of chemical weapons,” and with those words, attributed to Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem, an American entry into Syria’s civil war may be averted—but there remain serious obstacles to peace.

In statements evocative of those made before the 2003 invasion of Iraq, Secretary of State John Kerry and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said the threat of force was necessary to apply pressure to Syria. It appears that the White House will continue to push for authorization to bomb Syria, after an American-French-British conference call that promised preparation for “a full range of responses.”

Russia, meanwhile, says there can be no deal unless foreign powers stop threatening its allies in Damascus.

President Obama wants any agreement to be authorized by the U.N. Security Council, and there we find more trouble still. Russia wants to author its own proposal, which would lead to Syria’s chemical weapons disarmament, but Moscow does not want Damascus blamed for any previous chemical weapons attacks. That sticks in the craw of the Obama administration, which has argued that the point of the exercise is not to embolden other bad actors in the Middle East (hint hint: Iran).

If peace is to be had—and it’s difficult to call the status quo of an ongoing civil war “peace”—both Russia and the West will have to give something up. Moscow cannot play the role of puppet master and audience—some check by other powers is to be expected. Meanwhile, the White House may have to content itself that the destruction of Syrian chemical stockpiles is a good thing, the risks of a proxy war are too great, and America’s obsession with Iran may be less important, for now.

Sources: BBC, Reuters

—Posted by Peter Z. Scheer

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.