For years, the conservative wing of the Supreme Court has flapped mightily in the face of any attempt to deny American corporations their ability to disenfranchise and dispossess the American public. Compared to the media’s obsession with President Obama, the press makes few attempts to peer into the court’s marble nest, even though the justices and their predecessors are deeply involved in right-wing moneyed society, have repeatedly demolished campaign finance laws and hacked away at the rights of workers, voters, consumers and just about everyone else.
Jim Hightower, nationally syndicated columnist and host of Hightower Radio, offers us a much-needed, lively introduction to the conservative justices and their activities over the past decade. —ARK
AlterNet:
“Leveling the playing field can sound like a good thing. But in a democracy, campaigning for office is not a game.” —Chief Justice John Roberts, fumbling a sports metaphor in a June ruling that does, indeed, tilt the political field to assure that corporate-backed players win the crucial money game.
In case after case, the five hard-core Republicans of the Roberts Court have been chopping furiously at the hard-earned legal rights of workers, consumers, voters, and others who dare to challenge the power of big business elites to reign over us, both politically and economically. There has been way too little public attention focused on (much less a sustained political challenge to) what has become a spectacular abuse of government power. A survey last year by the Pew Center found that nearly three-fourths of Americans have no idea who John Roberts is. Eight percent named Thurgood Marshall as the chief justice (and I certainly wish he was, even though he’s been dead for 18 years).
It’s not that the public is stupid, but that the Court deliberately hides itself. No C-SPAN or other television cameras are allowed, even in the relatively few times the justices convene in public session. The bulk of the justices’ official policy-making work takes place behind closed doors. They practically never have press conferences or give interviews, and some have even refused to let the media cover their ‘public’ speeches.
If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.
I’d always thought somehow our supreme court justices
grew in wisdom and that as sacred keepers of our
constitution they were the ultimate protectors. Since
the Clarence Thomas appointment, I’ve known that it was
yet another illusion.
This betrayal by the Supreme Court is one of the bitterest of recent changes. Not that the Court wasn’t always class-biased and politically maniplative. But somehow that third branch of government seemed for decades to be just and fair in the best sense, most of the time. Now they have betrayed both themselves and us, to the nation’s sorrow and disgust. A couple more steps, and they will have sunk to the level of a firing squad.
As I confess this terrible truth, it literally brings up tears. The betrayal of our electoral process, already staggering under the weight of unsolved problems, was the last straw. There have been betrayals of democracy ever since money took over the rule of law, but the Court was providing the last bastion of integrity—until the decision of corporations as “persons.” IMO.
By david451, August 8, 2011 at 9:29 pm Link to this comment
For more thoughts on corporatism, though not directly tied to the Supreme Court, please see:
http://corporateconstraint.blogspot.com
Ciao.
Report thisBy san, August 8, 2011 at 6:24 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I’d always thought somehow our supreme court justices
Report thisgrew in wisdom and that as sacred keepers of our
constitution they were the ultimate protectors. Since
the Clarence Thomas appointment, I’ve known that it was
yet another illusion.
By gerard, August 8, 2011 at 4:58 pm Link to this comment
This betrayal by the Supreme Court is one of the bitterest of recent changes. Not that the Court wasn’t always class-biased and politically maniplative. But somehow that third branch of government seemed for decades to be just and fair in the best sense, most of the time. Now they have betrayed both themselves and us, to the nation’s sorrow and disgust. A couple more steps, and they will have sunk to the level of a firing squad.
Report thisAs I confess this terrible truth, it literally brings up tears. The betrayal of our electoral process, already staggering under the weight of unsolved problems, was the last straw. There have been betrayals of democracy ever since money took over the rule of law, but the Court was providing the last bastion of integrity—until the decision of corporations as “persons.” IMO.
By Marian Griffith, August 8, 2011 at 3:00 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Another proof of the saying that you need only five votes to rule the country absolutely.
And that the most important thing that any president can do is to appoint a justice to the supreme court who holds true to his or her principles.
Report this