LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 24, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

Colbert Slams PBS for Appeasing Koch Brothers

A Call to Action

Obama Heckled During Speech, Warren Lands a Book Deal, and More

After Oklahoma Disaster, Give Thanks to Government

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * A Mission on Climate Change

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Supreme Court: Elena Kagan Gets Obama’s Nod (Update: Video)

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on May 9, 2010
Flickr / Berkman10_220 (CC-BY-SA)

Much will be pored over and found and reported on Elena Kagan in the coming months. Right now the important bit is this: She’s a former Harvard Law dean, current U.S. solicitor general and President Obama’s choice to sit on the highest court in the land. Oh, and Thurgood Marshall called her “Shorty.”

Washington Post:

Even though the solicitor general is often called “the 10th justice,” she would be the first to join the court since Thurgood Marshall in 1967. It would be especially sweet for Kagan, who clerked for the civil rights icon in 1987-88 and has referred to him as “the most important lawyer, I think, of the 20th century.” He nicknamed her “Shorty.”

“She is a first-rate legal scholar, but she brings much more than that,” Walter Dellinger, an acting solicitor general under Clinton, said when she was nominated as the first woman to hold his old job. “She knows government, and she knows how to run institutions.”

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By doublestandards/glasshouses, May 10, 2010 at 2:26 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

A democwat can’t appoint a real leftist to the scotus ‘cause it’s not nice.  Republicans on the other hand don’t have to wouwy about being nice.
Bush ‘41 couldn’t get Bork confirmed but at least he had the balls to nominate him.

Report this

By NYCartist, May 10, 2010 at 1:13 pm Link to this comment

Read Marjorie Cohn on Kagan, on http://www.truthout.com or her own site http://www.marjoriecohn.com
And, Glenn Greenwald on http://www.democracynow.org this morning or his own site on Salon.com

Report this

By omop, May 10, 2010 at 11:43 am Link to this comment

Obama no fool. He doeth knoweth who are the real people in charge and he is
told what to do:

Just the facts accoding to several statisticians in America, 35% of the richest
men in America were Jews. America’s 400 richest men, according to a report in
the New York Times (March 23, 2009), own as much as 22% of the nation’s
total wealth, and around [37%]140 of these multibillionaires are Jews. 

According to statistical experts the Jewish population in the US is 2% of the
total estimated population of the USA in 2009.

As a famous Anonymous siad:- ” He who holds the gold makes da rules”.

Report this

By ofersince72, May 10, 2010 at 11:24 am Link to this comment

Pity The Children is exactly right..

Obama just nominated Goldman-Sachs to the Supreme Court!!

Report this

By Pity the children, May 10, 2010 at 8:20 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I can’t believe that Obama has such a tin ear that he’s picked a Goldman Sachs advisor to another branch of government.  This would mean the firm would have a physical presence in all three branches of our government. 

At a time when the only appropriate Federal facility for Goldman Sachs executives and their advisors is a federal prison, it is simply astonishing that Obama calculates that he can get away with this move. 

If Obama’s right—and he hasn’t lost a thing so far by assuming that the average American is a stupid fool—Americans will have lost yet another generation of good legal rulings. 

But unless you were alive during the era of Earl Warren, you don’t know what a worthwhile Supreme Court is like.

Report this

By ofersince72, May 10, 2010 at 6:31 am Link to this comment

It won’t be too long before they do what they did
in the fifties, soon we will have once again

Select Committee on Unamerican Activities, Probably
headed by none other than Joseph Lieberman.

Report this
thebeerdoctor's avatar

By thebeerdoctor, May 10, 2010 at 6:22 am Link to this comment

President Obama probably likes the idea of being the first Presidency to have 3 women on the Supreme Court.

Report this

By omop, May 10, 2010 at 6:17 am Link to this comment

Definitely an ideal candidate. If criticised one can be assured of being called,
“antisemitic’; no paper trail of past judicial decisions thereby minimizing any
major contentious questioning; a female thereby voiding any sexist or sexual
harrasement views. And a lesbian.

If Ms. Kagan is the best of the best candidates to be a member of the US Supreme
Court then America has truly and indeedly changed.

Report this

By ofersince72, May 10, 2010 at 6:15 am Link to this comment

Glen Greenwald, where ever you are, thank you,
You tried your damndest.
As I have said before, screw Obama and Holder.
and the whole Democrat Party.!!!!!!!!!!!!

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, May 10, 2010 at 5:14 am Link to this comment

I love another quote from the same Washington Post article: “Obama hopes she’ll provide a counterweight to the intellectual heft of Chief Justice Roberts…”

What exactly does that imply??

I’m not sure I’d have put it that way.

Report this

By Will, May 10, 2010 at 4:09 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I’ve heard that she’s largely in-line with the view of a supreme executive and
that’s Obama is giving her the nod.  Despite railing against the rise of executive
power and getting votes for his “stance” in 2008, Obama quickly and quietly
reversed himself.

“That’s not only because she’s never been a judge, but also because (a) her
academic career is surprisingly and disturbingly devoid of writings or speeches on
most key legal and Constitutional controversies, and (b) she has spent the last
year as Obama’s Solicitor General, where (like any lawyer) she was obligated to
defend the administration’s policies regardless of whether she agreed with them.”

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/04/13/kagan

Report this
brewerstroupe's avatar

By brewerstroupe, May 10, 2010 at 12:33 am Link to this comment

During her confirmation hearing last week, Elena Kagan, the nominee for solicitor general, said that someone suspected of helping finance Al Qaeda should be subject to battlefield law — indefinite detention without a trial — even if he were captured in a place like the Philippines rather than in a physical battle zone.

Ms. Kagan’s support for an elastic interpretation of the “battlefield” amplified remarks that Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. made at his own confirmation hearing. And it dovetailed with a core Bush position. Civil liberties groups argue that people captured away from combat zones should go to prison only after trials.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/18/us/politics/18policy.html?_r=1

Plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose.

Even Goering got a trial.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.