|
|
May 25, 2013
|
|
Democrat Stupak Won’t Run AgainPosted on Apr 9, 2010
Bart Stupak, the Michigan congressman who led the charge against President Obama’s health care bill on the grounds that it might allow tax money to pay for abortions, has decided he will not run for re-election in 2010. The Democrat has been on the defensive since he accepted an executive order promising no federal financing of abortions and then voted for the reform bill. Tea party and anti-abortion activists (is there a difference?) have aggressively campaigned against Stupak, attacking the congressman from the right, while pro-choice Democrats chastised him for dragging his heels. —JCL
Advertisement New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By ofersince72, April 9, 2010 at 7:31 pm Link to this comment
Really? You believe that Sunday superbowl show??
Report thisWhy does this bill not go into effect until 2014?
The Republicans were tickled to death with this bill.
By rollzone, April 9, 2010 at 5:51 pm Link to this comment
hello. Michigan is a troubled land, supposedly divided by the good north, and the not so good south. i believe this gentleman was representing the good north, but got scared for his life, and turned to join the evil empire. i can not blame him for choosing to be there for the growth of his children, just find it unfortunate that he found himself in a life threatening predicament as a public representative. if he would at some time go public with the truth about what happened, perhaps it will never happen again.
Report thisBy rico, suave, April 9, 2010 at 1:48 pm Link to this comment
“Tea party and anti-abortion activists (is there a difference?)”
Yes there is JCL, you blindered moron.
Report thisBy yfic, April 9, 2010 at 1:45 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
ofersince72, to call Stupak “inept” makes no sense. Stupak held out for the assurances he wanted, and once he had them, he agreed to sign off on a bill that represented the priorities of his party and president. It’s called negotiation. I don’t agree with Stupak’s pro-life views, but I respect him for participating in the process, and holding up his end of the bargain he made. Unlike, say, any Republican member of the House or Senate.
Report thisBy ofersince72, April 9, 2010 at 9:51 am Link to this comment
Good ridance !!!!!!!!!! However, I am sure your
Report thisreplacement will probably be just as inept.