|
|||
|
Study: Working Moms Making Kids FatterPosted on Feb 4, 2011
Oh good, here’s another sciencey reason for working moms to fret. Researchers from three big U.S. universities teamed up to come to the dispiriting conclusion that there could well be a correlation between the amount of time mothers work and how much their kids weigh. —KA
Advertisement Previous item: ‘Day of Departure’ in Egypt Next item: Another Diplomatic Oops for the U.S., Courtesy of WikiLeaks New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By freikish, February 8, 2011 at 6:14 pm Link to this comment
Here, let me spell this out for the researchers who can’t figure this out on their own: working moms == more takeout or fast food == fatter kids (fatter adults, too).
Second supporting formula:
stay at home dad != less takeout or fast food. Because stay at home dads do, in general, less housework/cooking/chores than stay at home moms. Hell, half the stay-at-home dads I know (that’s 3 of 6) do less housework than their gainfully employed spouse.
All this is generality - I’m not impugning on anyone’s amazing working/stay-at-home spouse…
Report thisBy billiam, February 6, 2011 at 10:58 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I’m waiting to hear from female boomers in nursing homes (should I live so long) concerning their choices, disappointments, bitternesses, etc.
Report thisBy AnnaCatherine, February 5, 2011 at 1:28 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
These people have money to burn. Information is useless and unimportant. Kids are fat because they don’t “go out and run around” the way they once did. Time spent with TV, video games, texting, etc. has made it impossible for kids to get any exercise. Their days are not designed to include any free time. Everything is programmed and structured. The Northeast has been covered with snow for weeks and I have yet to see kids sleigh riding. That’s so sad.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, February 5, 2011 at 11:40 am Link to this comment
Who finances these studies?
Have we as a species run out of important things to study like pollution, alternate energy, recycling than investigate fast corporate food and the fatness which results.
Talk about maligned priorities.
Report thisBy winsome1, February 5, 2011 at 10:25 am Link to this comment
Yes, and who financed these studies and toward what end? This is “scienciness,”
to extrapolate Stephen Colbert, and is not worthy of Truthdig’s attention. What
gives, Truthdig? Feel the need for human interest stories? Resist!
And dump Ruth Marcus.
Report this