LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     gay marriage     barack obama     robert scheer     chris hedges     ndaa
Most Read

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Truthdiggers of the Week: 400,000 Canadians Launching the ‘Maple Spring’

Russia and Exxon Mobil Sign Arctic Oil Deal

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Sperm Bank Bans Redheads

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Sep 18, 2011
Apokolokyntosis (CC-BY)

Cryos, an international network of sperm banks based in Denmark, is refusing donations from gingers, because, says director Ole Schou, there simply isn’t demand outside of Ireland, where red hair sells “like hot cakes.” The company is most interested in sperm from Indian donors and those with brown hair and eyes.

Cryos pays men up to $500 for their semen.

According to Schou, by way of the British newspaper The Telegraph, the firm has a waiting list of 600 donors and its reserves are at capacity.  —PZS

The Telegraph via Gizmodo:

Cryos’s stores have now reached their peak capacity of 70 litres of semen, and Mr Schou has a waiting list of 600 donors.

He said sperm from donors with brown hair and brown eyes was particularly in demand, because of the bank’s large customer base in Spain, Italy and Greece.

Indian sperm was also hard to find, he said, because India does not allow sperm or eggs to be exported, causing a problem for childless international Indians.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By SoTexGuy, October 1, 2011 at 9:52 am Link to this comment

Sperm and egg banks and ‘fertility’ centers, what are they about? As I mentioned earlier.. there’s no shortage of people on our earth!? So what’s the deal?

The only answer that comes to mind is eugenics.. That’s the science/religion of producing the next generation as the superior, dominant, or super race. The Nazis failed at it, even with the help of the Rockefellers and half the universities
in California.. now it’s done on the sly through marketing it as a ‘service’.

We’ll ‘help you’ have children.. stronger, healthier, taller, more athletic (mostly more white) children…

This article that suggests uber-white red head sperm is losing demand is notable only because it may suggest a new ideal.. less focused on the Nazi Aryan model.

Adios!

Report this

By Bruce, September 30, 2011 at 9:15 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

They say sperm from blondes and reds are in less demand and they are no longer accepting them. But somehow I don’t believe that is 100% the case, if it is even the case at all. I think someone has a morbid dislike for such outstanding people and wants to gradually weed them out.(PLANNED GENOCIDE)If they announced they were no longer accepting semin from say blacks etc, all hell would break loose, there would be a hell of an uproar. Talk about racism being a complete one way street.

Report this

By Karon Reiter, September 20, 2011 at 7:37 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I don’t think having brown eyes - big Mediterranean brown eyes and hair or dark Spanish eyes and hair or beautiful big Italian eyes is drab at all. Or anyone who is dark and exotic, particularly Asians. One can say that about washed out blondes that you see constantly as the pinnacle of beauty in western culture. If any group is tribal, it’s the fair haired blue eyed lot who have discriminated and caused genocide against those dark eyed, dark haired people that don’t look like them. I think there’s way more diversity among brown eyed people who cover a far more varied range of ethnicities than the small pocket of northern European ancestry.

Report this
nat's avatar

By nat, September 20, 2011 at 3:43 pm Link to this comment

i guess people just want to be around (or produce) people that look like
themselves….hence the dark hair/ dark eyes requests from the Mediterranean
countries they mentioned….....shame as red-heads can be strikingly beautiful.

Report this

By SoTexGuy, September 20, 2011 at 3:02 am Link to this comment

I don’t read the article as any warning of an end to red headed people.. maybe the title to the article is a little sensational.. as was noted.

The real shocker in all of this is that in a world overflowing with the Human species.. a world already driven to war over resources, ravaged by mass-extinctions and an increasingly hostile climate .. in this sea of humanity we find need to make sure everyone can procreate? It’s nonsense.

Adopt.. or get a dog (from the animal shelter).

Adios!

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, September 20, 2011 at 1:50 am Link to this comment

Anti-semanism.

Report this
Blueboy1938's avatar

By Blueboy1938, September 19, 2011 at 2:39 pm Link to this comment

This is a very invidious and insidious policy.  If they only want brown eyed,
black haired donors, they will be contributing to the demise of fair-skinned
blonds with blue eyes and, yes, red-heads, which are already at a disadvantage
because the genes for those traits are recessive.  I read some time ago that
red-heads will become extinct by - I think it was - the end of this century. 
Sounded pretty unlikely until the news items about ginger-abuse and now this. 
There apparently is an active hostility towards red-headedness that strikes me
as some visceral tribalism and antipathy toward “The Other” that is disturbing.

Ah, yes.  After a brief Google of “red-head extinction” I confirmed that there
was a National Geographic article in mid-2007 which posited the extinction as
anywhere from 2060 to 2100.  That’s not very far off.  They must have factored
in that red-heads are more prone to skin cancer, which is increasingly epidemic
with the advent of the ozone hole(s).  What a numbing tragedy to consider:  The
homogenization of the human race into uniformly black-haired, brown-eyed
drabness:-(

Report this

By JMD, September 19, 2011 at 11:53 am Link to this comment

Look on the bright side of this for being a redhead -
considering marriage.They stand a good chance of
knowing that they are not related!
The rest of society - ? 
Thanking you for this opportunity to comment -
James M. de Laurier           9/19/2011

Report this

By sickofallthesnooki, September 18, 2011 at 3:22 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Nice sensationalist headline. They’re not accepting sperm from redheads because
there’s no demand for it outside of one country. Sheesh.

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.