LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     gay marriage     barack obama     chris hedges     ndaa     robert scheer
Most Read

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Truthdiggers of the Week: 400,000 Canadians Launching the ‘Maple Spring’

Russia and Exxon Mobil Sign Arctic Oil Deal

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
History’s Greatest Heist

History’s Greatest Heist

By Sean McMeekin
$27.36

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Six Nations Hold U.N. Huddle About Iran

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Apr 8, 2010
Ahmadinejad
AP / Hasan Sarbakhshian

Paging President Ahmadinejad, please come to the red courtesy phone: Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaks at a ceremony at the country’s Narantz nuclear facility in 2009.

On Thursday, President Barack Obama made his case for a fourth round of sanctions against Iran to send a strong message to Tehran about its nuclear program, but some other global powers aren’t on board with that plan just yet—namely, China and Russia.

BBC:

The UN ambassadors of six world powers have met in New York to discuss possible new sanctions against Iran over its disputed nuclear programme.

China and Russia have so far refused to back the new measures put forward by the US and some European delegations.

Arriving with his Russian counterpart, China’s new ambassador Li Baodong said it was a “very important negotiation”.

The fourth round of sanctions mainly target Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, but not the country’s oil and gas sector.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By radson, April 9, 2010 at 4:58 pm Link to this comment

rfidler
Good question ,especially when one considers Chinese influence in the matter.

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, April 9, 2010 at 4:25 pm Link to this comment

Samson:
“Exxon makes big money from Iran’s “oil and gas sector””

Back that up with stats please.

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, April 9, 2010 at 2:54 pm Link to this comment

American needs to withdraw its military forces in the mideast and cease the provocative, imperialist diplomacy that has defined and demonized the U.S. in the eyes of the world since the end of WWII.

We have squandered too much wealth on violence.

Report this

By Grant, April 9, 2010 at 11:54 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

REF: SAMPSON

I am one able to recognize the words of an enlightened soul and you are clearly offering us the message from the Elders of Zion.

The talk about exploding a nuclear pulse bomb over Iran brings tears to my eyes and make by legs tremble. These are the thoughts I would expect from the real Messiah, not some namby pamby pacifist pretender but a warrior sent to destroy our many enemies!

Bomb, bomb bomb! Total eradication of the non believers is the only solution.

Report this

By Grant, April 9, 2010 at 11:25 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

REF: Gerard

Gerard has an exceptional solution for anyone who doesn’t conform to the plans of our enlightened leaders, chosen by God to rule the world by any means necessary. Gerard understands the time has come to complete the Protocols of Zion.

Might ensures right and now it is merely the detail of timing that stands in the way. As so many of the elders have proclaimed, bomb bomb bomb!

The rapture and glory is near. Would that the final piece fall into place and the messiah now p[art the clouds and proclaim the final victory.

Report this

By gerard, April 9, 2010 at 11:12 am Link to this comment

MarthaA: Thanks for bringing in that old “triumphant exceptionalism” thing again.  What gets me is how come these liberals commenting here don’t seem to see the connection between the recent meager nuclear agreement with Russia (after decades of doing absolutely nothing) and taking a first step back from the “exceptionalism” nonsense. It is a tacit acknowledgement of the fact that American isolationism has been based almost entirely on ideas of American “supremacy” and that “supremacy” entitles us to destroy the world if push comes to shove. It’s a very welcome (if subtle) acknowledgement that in a world of nuclear weapons, claims of “exceptionalism” and “supremacy” mean nothing whatsoever

Report this

By Grant, April 9, 2010 at 7:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Of course it is time to do to Iran even worse than what was done in Gaza. Netanyahu is the messiah and his wishes must be done. Bomb, bomb bomb! Why now?

Well, at the moment, Netanyahu has access to an unlimited supply of nukes, a vast array of delivery options and the raging desire to kill, burn and erase the anti-semites of Iran.

Never forget who God chose, afterall.

Report this
MarthaA's avatar

By MarthaA, April 9, 2010 at 7:26 am Link to this comment

The United States invokes the triumphant exceptionalism privilege, which isn’t allowed by other countries who are not allied to the United States.  Therefore, the United States has the privilege to explore nuclear energy, while other non allied countries are not privileged with triumphant exceptionalism.

Report this

By Grant, April 9, 2010 at 6:52 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Sanctions against Iran?
Iran has no nukes. Israel has hundreds of nukes plus a small fleet of modern nuke submarines. Hell, I am far more fearful of the bipolar leaders of Israel than anybody in Iran.

Mainstream Media is the only reason this nightmare continues. Meanwhile, the Zionist Protocols grind forward. Get real, suckers.

Report this

By Maxim, April 9, 2010 at 6:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The Start treaty or the perfect smoke-screen.
There is a lot to write about this “Treaty” which is singular as the Russians have clearly stated that if the United States install their planned anti-missiles “curtain”, this Treaty will be cancelled.
This Start agreement just means a kind of “pause” devoid of real content.
When both countries agree with the decrease of their “ready for use” ballistic missiles, the common public was not informed how this will be worked out as one essential element is not mentioned i.e. the power of these 1500 and something nukes ? The modest “Hiroshima type” bomb of 20 kiloton or the atmospheric Tsar Bomba of Novaya Zemlya which took
place in 1961 and developed some 50 MEGAton ? We presume that in their infinite wisdom these hyper-supremos have included some more detailed specifications? But, and this is an important reservation: this Treaty (with a capital “T” ? ) does not mean that the “remaining” bombs must be destroyed. It is understood that they shall be made temporarily innocuous -for some hours or days- as they could be put together again. On the other hand, 1500 nukes are unnecessary as a few ones could disable and ruin very large countries and even, the two hundred and something nukes said to be in the current Israel arsenal are a human non-sense.
If we consider the power not only in equivalent TNT explosives but also the insidious and deadly radiations, we should like to know how many bombs should be necessary to cover the sky with a blanket of poisonous clouds distributing their deadly particles on earth, including the “donor’s” land ? 
For this reason, should for instance, the Israeli airforces bomb a plant in Iran manufacturing enriched uranium, and with a block buster nuke sending the whole works into the sky, what should be the results of this unique humanitariann gesture ?
If Judge Goldstone was nothing but a bloody liar, should somebody remain on earth,much later however, to describe this doomsday ?
But this is not of course going to happen as we are -all of us- very reasonable and intelligent people or aren’t we ? Please reassure me as I am very anxious ?
With my best regards.
Maxim

Report this

By radson, April 9, 2010 at 6:38 am Link to this comment

Good comments overall.The Radio Station that Samson
is alluding to is in the city of Gliwice .The name of the Operation reads roughly as ‘Canned Goods’ ,the radio tower is still standing and I believe it’s the tallest radio tower in the world made of Wood .

Report this

By ghostrider67, April 9, 2010 at 2:00 am Link to this comment

I am sick and disgusted everytime i hear this whole circus show from the so called countries namely USA,Britain,France and Germany shouting Armaggedon about Iran’s (A NPT signatory country)nuclear program,while as i am writing this,netanyahu cancelled his trip to washington for the nuclear summit as not to face the few arab countries demanding why Israel is not a NPT member state.How long will decent human beings on this earth stand by while Israel continues to piss in the face of the international community?

Report this

By Commune115, April 9, 2010 at 12:26 am Link to this comment

Samson, excellent analysis. I guess you could make a comparison here with Hitler’s drive to war with Russia on messianic grounds. Hitler discussed with his inner circle his belief that he would lead the Aryan chariot of civilization against the dark forces of Bolshevism in a showdown he believed began with the French Revolution. From what we know from inside sources, Netanyahu appears to also feel some sort of historic calling to slay the Islamic dragon.

Report this
Samson's avatar

By Samson, April 8, 2010 at 10:41 pm Link to this comment

dear Commune ....

Right time, but wrong analogy.

Hitler’s Germany and Stalin’s Soviet Union were technically allies, or at least friends, when Germany attacked.  Hitler and Stalin had signed their ‘non-aggression’ pact when they had divided up Poland between them in ‘39.  This was still in force when the Germans attacked, mainly due to Hitler’s growing paranoia that Stalin would attack him first. 

Of course, Germany did prepare for such a major war for months in advance, but it was largely done as secretly as possible while Hitler still pretended that it was honoring their pact.

The better analogy is Hitler’s string of conquests before then.  Specifically Czechoslovakia and Poland.  In those, Hitler used negotiating techniques remarkably similar to those used by Bush and Obama.  Hitler made wild claims of damages and insults done to Germany and demanded resolution to these claims. 

Any attempts to really negotiate peacefully with Hitler were rejected by Hitler, and any olive branch would be met with more hostility and bluster designed to inflame and force a crisis instead of resolving the crisis. 

With the Czech crisis, when Hitler’s self-imposed deadlines for the negotiations to deal with the crisis he created were drawing near, Hitler massed troops on the border to threaten.  With Poland, Hitler staged a phony provocation where he killed some of his concentration camp prisoners then dressed them in Polish uniforms near a radio station near the border and claimed an attack which he was forced to meet with entire mass of the German army which was fortunately stationed right on the Poland border when the Poles dared their provocation.

This sounds much more like US “negotiations” that always seem to force a crisis and never seem to mean actually sitting down and resolving a problem, and where any offer from the other side is always rejected and deemed inadequate if not insulting.  This followed by massing of military might to either force the other side to give in or with a general willingness to unleash a horrible war upon the world.

Gerard laid out some very sensible ideas in his first comment, if anyone was really interested in ‘resolving’ this crisis.  The fact that none are ever really followed up on are even discussed publicly shows how little interest there is in ‘resolving’ this.

Both corporate parties love this as the sort of ‘issue’ that rallies the sheeple and tries to make everyone forget that wall street has stolen all the money and sold all the jobs off overseas.  And its instrumental in justifying large defense budgets, large intelligence budgets.  Its almost the entire justification for ‘missile defense’ and the only justification for putting such a system in Europe. 

And of course, all the right people in DC just love a good little war.  They’ve obviously gotten bored with all the wars they’ve already got up in their room and are crying for a shiny new war that they just have to have or else we’ll all be doomed.  Doomed I say. Doomed.

Isn’t it strange how all wars are justified by saying us poor citizens will be doomed to die if we don’t have the war, when its really the actual having the war the dooms the citizens of the era.

Report this
Samson's avatar

By Samson, April 8, 2010 at 10:21 pm Link to this comment

Exxon makes big money from Iran’s “oil and gas sector”, so you can bet that Iran’s “oil and gas sector” will not face any sanctions anytime soon.

Of course, if anyone was serious about using sanctions to really change what Iran was doing, then Iran’s “oil and gas sector” would be exactly what you would target with sanctions.

Take note when they show you the real priorities.  For instance, now you know that despite all the talk about how we are in mortal peril and the world could face catastrophe from Iran’s mythical nuclear weapons, the powers that be do not think its worth impacting Exxon’s profits to do anything about it.

Report this

By Commune115, April 8, 2010 at 10:06 pm Link to this comment

Dangerous times. Imperialism or Israeli radicals appear to be planning war on Iran the way Nazi Germany prepped for invading the Soviet Union.

Report this

By Tinkie, April 8, 2010 at 9:26 pm Link to this comment

I am all for a “nuclear free world”.

First, I do not think Iran would ever attack anyone with nuclear weapons. This is because they know that the ones they attack, also have them and would reciprocate.

Second, as a Jewish Israeli, I do not understand why all attention is directed to Iran and their nuclear program, all the while Israel is becoming more radical and fundamental. The Netanyahu government are just a bunch of low-life criminals, bullying the world into what they want.
I think it is dangerous that our zealot government has control over an entire arsenal of nuclear weapons - but it doesn’t seem to bother the International community.
Why is nobody mentioning the Israeli nuclear program?

Report this

By Aarky, April 8, 2010 at 6:34 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The Iranians only decided to boost the purity of their U-235 from about 5% to 20% because the US and France had insisted that they ship all their stock of 5% to France or Russia to be purified and then shipped to France to be installed in the feeder tubes that would be shipped back to Iran. At some point they didn’t believe that their fuel would be shipped back, especially when they realized that Sarkozy of France is a Zionist and that Obama was a willing stooge for the Israelis. The Russians and Chinese are smart enough to realize that the Israelis are behind the attempt to keep any gasoline from being shipped to Iran. Senator Lieberman tried to get a resolution passed that would have the US Navy blockade the Iranians, but that attempt was quickly shot down when members of Congress were warned that a blockade was also an act of war. He tried again and that was also shot down. The most recent move was to threaten economic retaliation on any company that ships gas to Iran. That’s why Lukoil, a Russian company has stopped doing business in Iran. The Bush regime created the “Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence” in 2005 which some analysts have compared to the “Office of Special Plans” which created the lies that were used by the White House to help justify attacking Iraq. The Russians and Chinese are smart enough to veto any attempt to carry out the Israeli program against Iran.

Report this

By samosamo, April 8, 2010 at 4:58 pm Link to this comment

Well, there are at least 2 countries that the god almighty united
states of corporations can’t threaten into believing and acting
upon Iran as having nuclear weapons, and once again, let us
hear from Scott Ritter on the matter.

I do notice one thing about all the nuclear weapons reductions
with usa and russia, all the other finanical concerns facing this
nation are still spiraling headlong into collapse, while a nuke
treaty on reduction is the ‘issue de jour’ being fed into the
campaign for o’s 2012 quest to get re-elected so the financial
matters are of little concern, meaning the number and intensity
of all the crises on-going have everything to do with people
being overwhelmed and less capable in trying to sort them all
out that far too many just give up and don’t care anymore,
compliments of the MSM.

Hell, as much as I abhor using nuclear energy for what ever
reasons, Iran has signed the NPT while its antagonists HAVE
NOT, thus if Iran wants to poison the future with radioactive
decay lasting:

Summary of Uranium Isotopes
Uranium-238         4.46 billion
Uranium-235         704 million
Uranium-234         245,000

Plutonium
Pu-238 - 87.74 years
Pu-239 - 24065 years
Pu-240 - 6537 years
Pu-241 - 14.4 years
Pu-242 - 3.76E5 years
Pu-243 - 4.956 hours
Pu-244 - 8.26E7 years

then let them as all the other countries using nuclear energy are
on the table doing it. Besides, who amongst these current card
carrying nuclear nations are going to tell the truth about their
programs especially the ones with weapons programs.

Report this

By gerard, April 8, 2010 at 4:03 pm Link to this comment

Suggestion:  Sell Iran nuclear isotopes for medical use at a price cheaper than they could tool up to make their own.  At the same time indicate strongly that the recent agreement between Russia and U.S. on reducing nuclear weapons is a first step toward complete elimination of nuclear weapons, with more agreements to come in the near future.  Hold some other kind of incentive up for them so they can get their extreme nationalists off their backs,  Do nothing to injure over-sensitive pride, stimulate envy or make them “lose face.”  All cheaper than
permitting further proliferation or threatening war, retaliation etc. etc.  Be smart. Be cool. Time to take a deep breath and reverse the “American dominance” song-and-dance.  It’s exhausted itself.
MHO.

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.