On Thursday, the Senate helped bring financial reform one step closer to reality by approving legislation designed to get at some of the roots, at least, of the economic destruction that Wall Street wrought two years ago. The vote was mostly split along predictable partisan lines, with a couple outliers on the Republican side and one Democratic vote against the bill from Sen. Russ Feingold. —KA
The New York Times:
Passage of the bill would herald the end of more than a generation in which the prevailing posture of Washington toward the financial industry was largely one of hands-off admiration, evidenced by steady deregulation. While the measure does not fully restore the toughest restrictions imposed after the Great Depression, it is a clear turning point, highlighting a new distrust of Wall Street, fear of the increasing complexity of technology-driven markets, and renewed reliance on government to protect the little guy.
The bill would create a council of high-level federal officials, led by the Treasury secretary, to try to detect, and perhaps prevent, systemic dangers to the financial system, and it would give the government new authority to seize and shut down failing financial institutions, by liquidating assets and forcing shareholders and creditors to take losses.
It would create a powerful consumer financial protection bureau, to be housed in the Federal Reserve, and widely expand the regulatory authority of the central bank. It would widen the purview of the Securities and Exchange Commission to strengthen regulation of hedge funds, other private equity firms, and credit rating agencies.
The bill also seeks to curb the most risky behavior on Wall Street, by restricting the ability of banks to invest and trade for their own accounts — a provision known as the Volcker rule, and by creating an extensive regulatory framework for derivatives, the complex financial instruments that were at the heart of the 2008 crisis.
We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.
In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.
Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.
Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.
Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.
As a free-marketeer I hate the government interference, but I have to admit, the industry made their own bed on this one. Greed rules, and it has to be tamed.
By call me roy, July 17, 2010 at 11:13 am Link to this comment
2,100 page bill and it never resolves “The Fannie & Freddie” problem. Another “Progressive” masterpiece.
Report thisBy eir, July 16, 2010 at 4:51 am Link to this comment
They learned their lesson and will never do it again. Barney and Chris said so.
Report thisBy mab, July 15, 2010 at 2:08 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Is this a sick joke? Reform? Ha, ha, ha, ha. Bwa, ha, ha, ha. Glass-Steagall is the only reform that counts. All else is bullshit, as is Obama.
Report thisBy rico, suave, July 15, 2010 at 12:17 pm Link to this comment
As a free-marketeer I hate the government interference, but I have to admit, the industry made their own bed on this one. Greed rules, and it has to be tamed.
Report this