|
|||
|
Secession Proposal Would Create a Republican CaliforniaPosted on Jul 12, 2011
By the Los Angeles Times’ count, there have been more than 220 attempts to divide California, and all have failed. A new proposal by a Temecula politician would split off the conservative counties south and east of Los Angeles to form a Republican-dominated South California that would be home to 13 million people (minus those who flee after secession). A spokesman for Gov. Jerry Brown had this retort to the proposal: “If you want to live in a Republican state with very conservative right-wing laws, then there’s a place called Arizona.” Unlike previous schemes that would divide San Francisco and Los Angeles from each other, the Democratic strongholds would remain in the same state. This would come as a relief to many of us in Los Angeles, although our northerly cousins find us annoying for our lack of knowledge about chard. —PZS
Advertisement Previous item: Study: More U.S. Men Than Women Die of Cancer Next item: Nominate Our Next Truthdigger of the Week New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By ghostofwatergate, July 14, 2011 at 6:08 pm Link to this comment
And what is the tax base of this new Republican / Libertarian paradise? How are they going to pay for their government, their water & power? And what is their job base?
Most of the heavyweight business in Cal are in Los Angeles and San Francisco counties, with their war industries such as Lockheed and Hughes and the software companies & financial giants such as TransAmerica and EON, etc and the shipping ports and the garments and furniture (!) industries of LA. Do those clowns even know that the Mojave Desert starts just north of LA and runs east all the way to the Colorado River? And what does the eastern Mojave give us? Boraxo. What does San Diego have? Several military bases and no railroads and it’s not a shipping port. The central valley is a garden of course, but those farms are all corporate-owned and government subsidized, and use migrant immigrant labor, so I ask again—How are they going to pay for their Libertarian paradise?
So, on balance, sounds like a great idea to me. Hah.
Report thisBy libfreak48, July 14, 2011 at 5:23 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I would LOVE to see a 51st state formed, a conservative
utopia of free-market unfettered by regulation and non-
governmental interference.
Just so I could watch it fail spectacularly and utterly
Report thisdiscredit conservative dogma.
By prisnersdilema, July 14, 2011 at 5:28 am Link to this comment
If thine eye offends thee cast it out….
Report thisBy BrunoDiderot1, July 13, 2011 at 7:12 pm Link to this comment
I don’t see Orange and San Diego Counties joining the new state.
But I see this new state extending northward, all the way to the Oregon border, and I see there being East California and West California, with the eastern (“rural” . . . wink, wink) counties joining the new state . . . that makes more sense than North and South California. The right-wing morons are not exclusively a
Report thisphenomenon of the southern part of the state; they are mainly in the eastern part of the state.
By Tesla, July 13, 2011 at 6:37 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
bt, the Clinton years were good because it was the
Report thisfirst of the super bubbles (until they collapsed in the
fall of 2000). I remember my 401k taking a serious dump
then. Clinton was a “sell-out” to the republican
vision with his elimination of Glass-Stegell, signing
onto NAFTA, “workfare”, the omnibus anti-terrorism laws
of ‘95/96, Waco Branch Davidian fiasco and Ruby Ridge.
Yeah, those were the days alright!
By tussah, July 13, 2011 at 9:09 am Link to this comment
Fine with me. Those of us who live in the far northern part of the state will be so happy to finally have a chance to charge ‘South California’ appropriately for the water and the power that flow from our mountains and our dams. We need the income to buy chard.
Report thisBy Tom Weidermeijer, July 13, 2011 at 8:59 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Ah, the good old Inland Empire. The land of the Dirt People.
I am SO glad I was able to escape Riverside County.
Report thisMaybe this ahole can declare himself “Admiral of the Salton Sea”.
By theotherjimmyolson, July 13, 2011 at 8:37 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
to inherit the wind, have you ever heard of Massachusetts? Maine? I would certainly welcome a division of red and blue states into separate countries.
Report thisBy California Ray, July 13, 2011 at 8:14 am Link to this comment
Unexpected things can happen when empires collapse.
Report thisBy LostHills, July 13, 2011 at 5:34 am Link to this comment
I live in Kern Kounty. It’s already a Republikan 3rd world country. Don’t come here
Report thiswithout a gun and a flack vest…
By Inherit The Wind, July 13, 2011 at 3:39 am Link to this comment
Only once has a state been formed from within the territory of another state since the Constitution was enacted. That was West Virginia, formed from the non-slave owning loyalist part of a state that engaged in treason when it seceded. I believe that Virginia’s acceptance of West Virginia’s creation was a contingency for re-admission back into the union.
From a financial point of view, I expect if all the red states seceded and formed their own nation, the remaining blue states could have a balanced Federal budget in oh, say, 6 months to a year. The Blues subsidize the Reds despite the assertions of the GOP that they are for “free enterprise” and “individualism”—their reps and sens make DAMN sure they get the lion’s share of federal spending—underwritten by the Blues.
Report thisBy Psychobabbler, July 12, 2011 at 9:54 pm Link to this comment
There is a war being played down here. Lawyers vs. the people. The legal ones threaten to bankrupt everyone who challenges them. No sympathy nationally because they have there own problems to attend to. People (like me) who support unions on one hand and promote the absorption of poverty on the other are looking pretty silly, like a dog chasing it’s own tail. I remember an ‘expert’ recently on PBS (from UCSD) explaining it in a very revealing way. First of all any ‘expert’ from UCSD probably isn’t from here and never ventured far from the cushy college campus/beach community (AKA La Jolla) that they preach from but, anyways.
He said that “most economists agree that illegal immigration is negative in the short term and positive in the long term”
Please excuse my ignorance but I am pretty sure that the negative and positive results will always be present unless there is an end to it.
He strikes my as one of the people who benefits from it unlike the rest of us who are having our cost of living increased and incomes decreased whilst being force fed nonsense about workers rights.
California has been a meat market for property/tourist trapping and a lifestyle that never existed (for most people) for a looooooooong time.
Put people into a red box and blue box if it helps you sleep at night.
Report thisBy bt, July 12, 2011 at 9:47 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Robespierre115:
And you would do what? Wave a magic wand and raise
the taxes? There is no acknowledgement here of the
reality of governing and actually getting things
passed into law. Its not easy.
I am really tired of these attacks on democrats by
‘true liberals’. This was a constant drum beat during
the Clinton years. Those were the best years of my
working life that’s for sure. And there was a surplus
to go with it. What the f**k is wrong with people.
Robespierre115 probably voted for Ralph Nader. Yeah,
Report thisAl Gore is just as bad as George Bush. Yeah,
democrats suck. Grow up. Or shut up.
By Robespierre115, July 12, 2011 at 4:38 pm Link to this comment
The sad truth is that BOTH Republican and Democrat Californias are ruled by hypocrite, sell out politicians. “A spokesman for Gov. Jerry Brown had this retort to the proposal: ‘If you want to live in a Republican state with very conservative right-wing laws, then there’s a place called Arizona.’” That is such hypocrisy considering Brown’s economic policies are no different from Republican ones, just ask the students dealing with higher tuition fees, the librarians, teachers and cops losing their jobs.
Report this