What are we to make of Thursday’s Supreme Court ruling, which will make life more difficult for Arizona employers who deliberately hire undocumented workers? The Atlantic’s Andrew Cohen offered his perspective later that day. —KA
Andrew Cohen in The Atlantic:
It is true that Justice Kennedy sided (this time) with his conservative colleagues in endorsing an Arizona law that authorizes state officials to suspend or revoke the licenses of business whose managers knowingly or intentionally hire undocumented workers. That law, five justices said with differing degrees of rectitude, is neither preempted by federal immigration law nor implicitly in conflict with federal immigration policy.
Thursday’s ruling was about statutory construction. The next Supreme Court battle over Arizona’s immigration initiatives will be about the Constitution itself. But it is also true Arizona’s licensing law is very different in law and fact from those portions of S.B. 1070 which were passed last year by state officials and subsequently blocked by the federal courts. The more recent Arizona provisions, among other things, would require state law enforcement officials to stop and fine people suspected of being unlawful immigrants. They thus implicate significant individual rights and constitutional standards—of equal protection, of due process, etc.—which weren’t even mentioned, let alone analyzed, by either side in the Whiting case.
We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.
In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.
Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.
Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.
Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.
By Ralph Kramden, May 27, 2011 at 1:21 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
High Court? How about anti-democratic, corporatist low court? Reminds me of that line by Mae West:“Showing contempt of court? I’m trying my best to hide it.” Karl Marx was right, the legislature and the judicial system are the executive commitee of the ruling class. Our experiment in democracy has ended. It was destroyed in Athens, it has been destroyed here in the USA. Ave Ceasar Imperatur, we are too greedy, week,consumerist or cowardly to resist Mussolini-style corporatism. Democracy RIP. It was a noble try.
By Ralph Kramden, May 27, 2011 at 1:21 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
High Court? How about anti-democratic, corporatist low court? Reminds me of that line by Mae West:“Showing contempt of court? I’m trying my best to hide it.” Karl Marx was right, the legislature and the judicial system are the executive commitee of the ruling class. Our experiment in democracy has ended. It was destroyed in Athens, it has been destroyed here in the USA. Ave Ceasar Imperatur, we are too greedy, week,consumerist or cowardly to resist Mussolini-style corporatism. Democracy RIP. It was a noble try.
Report this