LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 26, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

British Terror Attack Suspect Had Watched Friend Cut to Pieces

Truthdigger of the Week: Medea Benjamin

Three Questions Left Unanswered by Obama’s Counterterrorism Speech

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

Taking Gay Hypocrites to Task Over Bradley Manning

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * A Cooler Century? Wait and See

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar

Mekong Diaries

By Sherry Buchanan
$19.80

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

High Court Scrutinizing Affirmative Action at Colleges

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Feb 21, 2012
Adam Fagan Rights reserved

A hot-button issue from the ’80s and ’90s has come up once again at the U.S. Supreme Court: affirmative action on the college level.

On Tuesday, the robed powers that be at SCOTUS agreed to take on a case concerning the University of Texas at Austin’s admissions policy, specifically regarding race and ethnicity.  —KA

CBS MoneyWatch:

The last time the U.S. Supreme Court reviewed affirmative action policies on college campuses was in 2003 in a landmark case involving the University of Michigan’s law school (Grutter v. Bollinger). With a fairly murky decision, the court upheld the continuation of racial preferences at public universities by a 5-to-4 vote.

[...] The current affirmative action litigation can be traced back to 2008 when the University of Texas rejected Abigail Fisher, a young white woman. She claimed that the school rejected her because of the color of her skin. Her lawyers claim the University of Texas exceeded what the 2003 court decision allowed.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By gerard, February 22, 2012 at 4:14 pm Link to this comment

Mixed-blood applicants must give them fits!

Report this

By felicity, February 22, 2012 at 12:41 pm Link to this comment

Marian - Actually Rove tried to ‘buy’ a degree. He was
asked to speak at a college and asked it in return to
award him an honorary degree (because he didn’t have a
legitimate one, it seems.)  The college turned him
down. Of course, that was then and this is now when
everything is for sale - for a price.

Report this

By bpawk, February 22, 2012 at 10:06 am Link to this comment

There should be interviews with no names involved (the interviewer asks questions and fills out forms but no names are used but each person given a number for ID) as well as blind applications where race (or even age) is not a factor - keep it anonymous. That way it is based on merit.  Not unlike scientists testing products and applicants where it is done blind, even to the scientist.

Report this

By Marian Griffith, February 21, 2012 at 3:26 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

@felicity

Why limit yourself to buying your way into college.
A degree is free speech too, so you should by able to buy as many of them as you want.

Report this
John M's avatar

By John M, February 21, 2012 at 2:17 pm Link to this comment

http://public.econ.duke.edu/~psarcidi/grades_4.0.pdf

If affermative action results in minority students at elite schools having much potential but
weak preparation, then we may expect minority students to start off behind their majority
counterparts and then catch up over time. Indeed, at the private university we analyze, the
gap between white and black grade point averages falls by half between the studentsífreshmen
and senior year. However, this convergence masks two e§ects. First, the variance of grades
given falls across time. Hence, shrinkage in the level of the gap may not imply shrinkage in
the class rank gap. Second, grading standards di§er across courses in di§erent majors. We
show that controlling for these two features virtually eliminates any convergence of black/white
grades. In fact, black/white gpa convergence is symptomatic of dramatic shifts by blacks from
initial interest in the natural sciences, engineering, and economics to majors in the humanities
and social sciences. We show that natural science, engineering, and economics courses are
more di¢ cult, associated with higher study times, and have harsher grading standards; all of
which translate into students with weaker academic backgrounds being less likely to choose
these majors. Indeed, we show that accounting for academic background can fully account for
di§erences in switching behaviors across blacks and whites

Report this
John M's avatar

By John M, February 21, 2012 at 2:16 pm Link to this comment

http://public.econ.duke.edu/~psarcidi/grades_4.0.pdf

If affermative action results in minority students at elite schools having much potential but
weak preparation, then we may expect minority students to start o§ behind their majority
counterparts and then catch up over time. Indeed, at the private university we analyze, the
gap between white and black grade point averages falls by half between the studentsífreshmen
and senior year. However, this convergence masks two e§ects. First, the variance of grades
given falls across time. Hence, shrinkage in the level of the gap may not imply shrinkage in
the class rank gap. Second, grading standards di§er across courses in di§erent majors. We
show that controlling for these two features virtually eliminates any convergence of black/white
grades. In fact, black/white gpa convergence is symptomatic of dramatic shifts by blacks from
initial interest in the natural sciences, engineering, and economics to majors in the humanities
and social sciences. We show that natural science, engineering, and economics courses are
more di¢ cult, associated with higher study times, and have harsher grading standards; all of
which translate into students with weaker academic backgrounds being less likely to choose
these majors. Indeed, we show that accounting for academic background can fully account for
di§erences in switching behaviors across blacks and whites

Report this

By felicity, February 21, 2012 at 1:25 pm Link to this comment

Given the Citizens United decision, it’s pretty
obvious that the Court will eliminate affirmative
action at colleges.  (By the way, 72% of political ad
spending during the 2010 elections would have been
prohibited before Citizens United.)

Maybe the Court will decide that grades, the SAT,
affirmative action should be eliminated as criteria
for college admittance and replace them with everyone
has a right to BUY his/her admittance into a college. 
Certainly be consistent with the Citizens United
decision.  (If you can buy an election you should
surely be able to buy your way into college.)

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.