 |
|||
|
|
|
 Scientists Create ‘Synthetic Cell’Posted on May 20, 2010
A team of U.S. scientists has created what they’re calling a “synthetic cell,” although really it appears to be more of a Franken-cell, if you will, since the cell’s genome is artificial but the “recipient cell” is not. All the same, it’s still bound to freak some people out. —KA
Advertisement Previous item: Polish Plane Crash Probe Points to Pilot Error Next item: Don't Ask, Don't Count: Pentagon Underreports Discharges New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
A Big Buyout at the Postal Service
Email
Print
Share
Digg
Facebook
TwitThis
StumbleUpon
Reddit
YahooBuzz
Email
BlinkList
del.icio.us
Fark
Furl
Google
LinkedIn
Mixx
MyShare
NewsVine
Propeller
SphereIt
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
_EM-160-120x110.jpg)
Newsletter 
Become a Fan
Follow Us
Subscribe
Tags|Bazaar|Podcast|About Us|Contact Us|User Agreement|Privacy Policy|FAQ: Comments and Moderation
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.
By Jace, May 22, 2010 at 11:19 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Joe, I think you are marginalizing what seems to be a very important event. While the end result is roughly the same as other genetic engineering processes, the process used was not. I think that many of the most important discoveries in science are not the actual discoveries themselves, but the processes that were used to make those discoveries. Processes such as PCR, Sanger sequencing, blotting, NMR, etc., are the real scientific achievements. Processes such as this open up a new way of thinking and potentially future great discoveries. (Sorry for saying “processes” so much)
Report thisBy JoeCitizen, May 20, 2010 at 5:36 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Despite Ventor’s hype, it was NOT a synthetic cell. The cell was entirely natural. What was “synthetic” was the DNA that was inserted into the nucleus to replace the natural DNA.
But even that was hardly remarkable. The DNA that was incorporated was an identical copy of the original DNA. Of course it worked - DNA is just a chemical - if you take out one copy of the chemical and replace it with an exact copy, it will work exactly the same. Geneticists have been synthesizing DNA for a long time, and inserting bits of it into cells - that is the primary procedure in all genetic engineering.
The only thing novel here is that the entire genome was synthesized instead of just parts.
So the cell was entirely natural, the composition of the DNA was exactly like the original, and the synthesis of DNA is nothing new. An enormous amount of over-hype by a scientist who is a businessman, and very well experienced in hyping things to a clueless media.
Report this