From START to finish: Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, pictured here with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during a meeting in Moscow about START in March, has signaled his disapproval of any changes to the treaty at this point in the process.
Some members of the U.S. Senate are dragging their feet and kvetching about wording issues in the latest American-Russian disarmament pact, the START treaty, as they prepare to vote for its ratification. In response, they have received a clear message from Moscow: The terms of the treaty are no longer negotiable. —KA
BBC:
Russia has warned US lawmakers that any change to the new nuclear arms disarmament treaty between the two countries could destroy the pact.
Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said the New Start treaty “cannot be reopened, becoming the subject of new negotiations” according to remarks reported by Interfax news agency.
Republicans in the US Senate have recently pushed to change its wording.
Two-thirds of the 100 US senators must back the treaty for it to be ratified.
“The Start agreement, which was drafted on the basis of strict parity, completely meets the national interests of both Russia and the United States,” Mr Lavrov told Interfax.
We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.
In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.
Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.
Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.
Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.
I would say that no matter which way the treaty
goes, neither the americans(especially) or the
russians(would not blame them), will divulge all
the warheads and missiles they possess. Secret
stashes are a part of the game.
P Henry, great observation. Probably her sexual
diplomacy she uses for those crazy enough to
‘dip their stick’. Hate to think what she would
birth if she got pregnant.
Our nukes are on hair trigger alert still.
Thirty minutes launch till impact.
We launched some weather missile off Norway in 1995.
We say we told the Russians.
They didn’t get the message
Russian military brought nuclear suitcase to Gorbachev and opened it saying they were under attack.
(a first strike would be a single nuke for EMP effect).
We were lucky he didn’t do his job.
The repugs want a nuke war so Jesus can come back.
Someone needs to call them on it.
I’m not even going to ask how you figure that, GRYM.
The Russians aren’t the Dim-ocrats. They don’t roll over and piss themselves when Re-Thuglicans say “Boo!” They will let the treaty fail if it is not ratified as negotiated. Unlike Dims, the Russians know how to win at the game of brinkmanship.
But the Re-thugs have been whuppin’ on the Dims for so long they don’t have a CLUE what it’s like to play against someone as tough or tougher, as mean or meaner, as greedy or greedier, as cruel or cruel, or as careless of consequences.
And, as soon as it fails, they will start selling technology to Iran, and to other “irritations”. They may even shut down the oil and gas pipelines again!
Re-thugs, you are in the Big Leagues now. Can you pitch and not get it hit out of the park?
The U.S. Congress can change the wording in the START preamble concerning missile defense, renegotiate that wording with the Russians, and have a signed treaty by March 2011.
By chip, December 21, 2010 at 12:52 pm Link to this comment
I guess it was Yeltsin not Gorbachev that failed to launch in 1995
Report thisBy samosamo, December 21, 2010 at 10:53 am Link to this comment
****************
I would say that no matter which way the treaty
goes, neither the americans(especially) or the
russians(would not blame them), will divulge all
the warheads and missiles they possess. Secret
stashes are a part of the game.
P Henry, great observation. Probably her sexual
Report thisdiplomacy she uses for those crazy enough to
‘dip their stick’. Hate to think what she would
birth if she got pregnant.
By chip, December 21, 2010 at 12:18 am Link to this comment
Our nukes are on hair trigger alert still.
Thirty minutes launch till impact.
We launched some weather missile off Norway in 1995.
We say we told the Russians.
They didn’t get the message
Russian military brought nuclear suitcase to Gorbachev and opened it saying they were under attack.
(a first strike would be a single nuke for EMP effect).
We were lucky he didn’t do his job.
The repugs want a nuke war so Jesus can come back.
Report thisSomeone needs to call them on it.
By Inherit The Wind, December 20, 2010 at 10:15 pm Link to this comment
I’m not even going to ask how you figure that, GRYM.
The Russians aren’t the Dim-ocrats. They don’t roll over and piss themselves when Re-Thuglicans say “Boo!” They will let the treaty fail if it is not ratified as negotiated. Unlike Dims, the Russians know how to win at the game of brinkmanship.
But the Re-thugs have been whuppin’ on the Dims for so long they don’t have a CLUE what it’s like to play against someone as tough or tougher, as mean or meaner, as greedy or greedier, as cruel or cruel, or as careless of consequences.
And, as soon as it fails, they will start selling technology to Iran, and to other “irritations”. They may even shut down the oil and gas pipelines again!
Re-thugs, you are in the Big Leagues now. Can you pitch and not get it hit out of the park?
Report thisBy Go Right Young Man, December 20, 2010 at 8:00 pm Link to this comment
The U.S. Congress can change the wording in the START preamble concerning missile defense, renegotiate that wording with the Russians, and have a signed treaty by March 2011.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, December 20, 2010 at 6:28 pm Link to this comment
Hillary looks like she just got laid.
Report this