Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
June 18, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     nsa     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

The Terror Con

The FBI May Have Finally Found Jimmy Hoffa

Say Hello to the 'Super Rich'

The Making of a Global Security State

This Will Not End Well

Most Comments
Most Emailed

 * NEW! * The Making of a Global Security State
 * NEW! * Climate Change Puts Lake Life at Risk
 * NEW! * The Terror Con



The Unwinding


Truthdig Bazaar
The Mitfords

The Mitfords

By Charlotte Mosley
$26.37

The Road

The Road

By Cormac McCarthy

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Reid and Republicans Make Their ‘Super Committee’ Picks

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Aug 10, 2011
Flickr / Center for American Progress Action Fund

In making his “super committee” selections, Sen. Harry Reid turned to senior Democrats instead of younger, more progressive-minded senators.

Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid and Senate and House Republican leaders have announced their selections for the deficit-reduction “super committee.” The 12-person council will attempt to cut about $1.5 trillion in federal spending over the next decade.

Reid will appoint Sens. Patty Murray, Wash.; Max Baucus, Mont.; and John Kerry, Mass.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell selected Sens. Jon Kyl, Ariz.; Pat Toomey, Pa.; and Rob Portman, Ohio.

House Speaker John Boehner picked Reps. Jeb Hensarling, Texas; Dave Camp, Mich.; and Fred Upton, Mich.

House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi has yet to name her three picks. 

The group will have until Nov. 23 to craft a plan, which must be approved by seven of its 12 members. If Republicans refuse to cooperate with their Democratic partners, cuts to Medicare, national security and other programs will occur automatically. —ARK

The Huffington Post:

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) will appoint Sens. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and John Kerry (D-Mass.) to the congressional debt-reduction “super committee” tasked with finding roughly $1.5 trillion in savings over the next decade. Murray will serve as one of the committee’s two co-chairs, alongside a House Republican.

... Reid’s picks suggest that he favored committee chairs and senior members of the party over some of the younger, more progressive-minded senators. Murray chairs the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and will undoubtedly keep electoral implications in mind as she weighs various policy suggestions. Kerry, who chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, is a top foreign policy voice in the party and will likely play a central role in carving out the cuts made to defense appropriations. Baucus, who chairs the Senate Finance Committee, is a leading figure on tax policy, another legislative component that falls within the committee’s purview. None of the three were part of the so-called Gang of Six -– the informal bipartisan group of senators who worked to craft a debt reduction plan of their own.

The choices are not particularly trusted in liberal circles either, in part because of concerns that moneyed interests may come in to play when it comes time to negotiate. In FY 2009, for instance, companies in Murray’s home state of Washington received $5.2 billion in defense contracts. Boeing Inc. is the fourth biggest contributor to Murray over the course of her career, according to data gathered by the Center for Responsive Politics.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Napolean DoneHisPart's avatar

By Napolean DoneHisPart, August 14, 2011 at 9:00 pm Link to this comment

I propose the Federal Government to be sacked; and given a mere toke role expressing the collective ( majority ) desires of the soveriegn states within the union…. and whatever the federal government drops as far as public services, the states can handle at their resident’s discretion.

Perhaps a ‘super committee’ could then do the bidding of their representatives in their states, and delegate the people’s will from the bottom up, and not from the top of somewhere else down.

Report this

By jim goodson, August 14, 2011 at 10:16 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Is This the best our elected Rep,s can do? This Super Committee Bull Sh_t. Is a lot like a Tea party wanna-be,s. It clearly demonstrates the inability to Govern. I did not elect my Representative to Pass the Buck. If you cannot do the Job, of Governing, QUIT. Go to Texas, Miss,or Mexico. MR. PRESIDENT. IF YOU CANNOT STAND UP FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS, THEN BY ALL MEANS STAND DOWN. You are, and act like LOSERS.

Report this
Napolean DoneHisPart's avatar

By Napolean DoneHisPart, August 11, 2011 at 7:42 pm Link to this comment

Incomprehensible for those who like the truth, and who actually read what the Constitution states…. all these heads will be on a stick soon enough, either literally or figuratively. 

The further advancement of empire and its tyrannical ways, the further entrenchment of those who would rather die ( and hold their 2nd Amendment right ) than live in a corporate police state.

Report this
AnAlienEarthling's avatar

By AnAlienEarthling, August 11, 2011 at 6:59 pm Link to this comment

It is incomprehensible that the Honorable Senator
Bernie Sanders from Vermont was not selected.

Report this
Napolean DoneHisPart's avatar

By Napolean DoneHisPart, August 11, 2011 at 10:24 am Link to this comment

So do folks NOW believe the communisto-esque element stemming from the privately owned FED on down to the managerial class who uphold the hegemony ( now called the council of 13 )?

This is yet another clear departure from the Constitution ( but who’s counting ). 

Where is today’s Napoleon ( I know, he metaphorically lost his head after attaining absolute power )? 

Or today’s Maximus Decimus Meridius ( I know, fictional character, but best example of ‘doing the right thing selflessly ).

Report this
Not One More!'s avatar

By Not One More!, August 11, 2011 at 9:56 am Link to this comment

The Dow market has never reflected the reality of the economic security and well-being of the general public, in fact it usually represents the opposite. When the market goes up, you know that the general public is being screwed again.

Of course, when the market goes down it gives them another reason to bring the hammer down on the general population, which they gleefully do. For the corporate elite and their henchmen, it’s a win-win situation. For the general public, it’s a lose-lose situation.

If someone starts a ‘score’ that is based on how affordable health care is for all, affordable educations costs and housing costs, cost of non-gmo food available for all, whether we are in an illegal war or not, the environmental damage created of manufacturing and consumption, that is what I want to see. I think that the current score would be at best a 3/10. Not just below failure, but approaching a level that is not survivable.

Report this
CJ's avatar

By CJ, August 11, 2011 at 9:28 am Link to this comment

Yes, Awi, the fix is indeed in. And enough with “Super Committee” or “Super
Congress.”

It’s a CENTRAL COMMITTEE not a wit different from the old Soviet-style one,
and if nothing else one has got to appreciate that irony. Not only did we lose
WWII in the end (same as we recently lost in Iraq, though in an obviously
different way, also ironically in the case of Iraq when Raj Bremer thought it best
to isolate and dispense with Baathist bureaucrats and Iraq’s standing army), we’re looking more and
more to have lost the Cold War as well, to the extent tyranny is more and more
in evidence, all the more so for all the talk of “America is still the greatest, blah,
blah…” on a Shakespearean scale. (No, I can name ten better places to subsist.)

Most offensive is Reid’s choice of the hapless, medical industry-owned Baucus, the same who f-ed up the
so-called “healthcare reform” bit. Reid has turned out a disaster of a Leader, while McConnell seems actually to run the Senate.

Who’s next? Will Reid bring back Bill Clinton? I expect he would if he could, Mr.
“fiscal conservative,” though when it comes to that, plenty in the Democratic
Party from among whom to choose.

The gimmick will probably work, fooling most all Americans most all of the
time.

A pity legislators don’t put the same effort into actually solving problems as
they do into figuring clever ways to avoid accountability.

Under the circumstances, term limits are probably the best we could do, though that would include a Bernie Sanders as well. That’s the rub with term limits.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, August 11, 2011 at 5:45 am Link to this comment

Boehner and McConnell have cemented in place our continuing economic collapse, making long-term recovery impossible.  The market MAY recover a little today, but I doubt it.  I expect that by the Bell on Friday the Dow will be below 10,000, where it hasn’t been in years.  Gold may well hit $1900 by week’s end and, by the end of next week, I’m guessing it approaches $2000.

Report this

By TDoff, August 11, 2011 at 5:25 am Link to this comment

If this ‘Super Committee’ doesn’t work, at the next session of Congress they can all draw straws. The congressfolk who draws the short straw has to kill him/her self. The lucky one who draws the long straw gets to kill all the remaining folk, leaving just him/her self to make all the decisions.

And since one vote don’t mean s**t in Congress, that ought to fix the problem. Nothing will get done, and we’ll be back to normal. Except with a lot less noise and bull***t.

Report this

By ardee, August 11, 2011 at 4:57 am Link to this comment

Six Republicans, six Democrats, twelve corporate stooges. Where are the people’s representatives on this committee? Or in our government?

Report this

By Awi, August 10, 2011 at 10:11 pm Link to this comment

The fix is in.  Dem’s will capitulate and ruin Medicare.  Defense will escape largely unchanged.  There will be no tax increases for the rich.  Progressive writers will excuse the Dem’s.  “o” will be characteristically pathetic.  The whole mess will be Christmas wrapped.  Scrooge rules!

Report this

By Big B, August 10, 2011 at 5:24 pm Link to this comment

waiting for Harry and Nancy to fuck up is like watching lucy and ethel on the candy assembly line, for the 50th time. You just know that each time, it will end in disaster.

At least Lucy was funny.

Report this
mrfreeze's avatar

By mrfreeze, August 10, 2011 at 4:55 pm Link to this comment

If the tea batters are so worried about what the Constitution has to say about our
government, why are they not raising a stink about this committee. Is it constitutional?

Report this

By Jeff Chambers, August 10, 2011 at 4:15 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Nice. They’re loading the jury that determines our economic fate.

And the hits just keep on coming.

Report this
Queenie's avatar

By Queenie, August 10, 2011 at 4:03 pm Link to this comment

ocjim:

Ask his proctologist.

Report this
Queenie's avatar

By Queenie, August 10, 2011 at 4:00 pm Link to this comment

All this because we have a nincompoop/spineless war criminal in the white house who has never fought for anyone who doesn’t have big bucks.

It’s time to tax the rich or eat them.

Report this

By ocjim, August 10, 2011 at 3:58 pm Link to this comment

Max Baucus is a bluedog who gets his orders from the rich. Where is Reid’s head?

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, August 10, 2011 at 3:36 pm Link to this comment

We need to get rid of these super-committee politburo members first.

Report this
Not One More!'s avatar

By Not One More!, August 10, 2011 at 2:55 pm Link to this comment

12 peas, all from the same pod.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.