|
|||
|
Recession Pinches Climate Change ProgressPosted on Aug 1, 2010
Amid recession worries and economic hardships, much of the industrialized world has pushed international goals of curbing climate change far off into the future. Politicians are wavering over caps on carbon emissions, citing the economic costs of cutting emissions. —JCL
Advertisement Previous item: Cluster Bomb Treaty in Full Effect Next item: Dropping Temperatures Take Toll in Peru New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By ofersince72, August 2, 2010 at 11:46 am Link to this comment
The proper terminology
Austerity pinches climate progress
Report thisBy Bronwen Rowlands, August 1, 2010 at 2:30 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
It’s time for Beckett:
I can’t go on, I’ll go on.
Report thisBy gerard, August 1, 2010 at 1:06 pm Link to this comment
Suggestion: Ask your Senators to support the bipartisan Clean Air Act (S-2877).(“CLEAR”) Every emitter of a ton of fossil fuel carbon dioxide pays an equal price. CLEAR does not subsidize nuclear power, coal, renewable energy, or any other energy source. It would reduce US fossil fuel dependence and greenhouse gas pollution. Because the price to the emitter is predictable, businesses can make long-term decisions that take the cost of polluting into account. S-2877 creates a disincentive to pollute. It compensates consumers for the inevitable increase in the price of carbon. It uses exsting government structures as much as possible, minimizing the need for new bureaucracy. (More from Friends Committee on National Legislation http://www.fcnl.org (Quakers)
Report thisBy wildflower, August 1, 2010 at 12:34 pm Link to this comment
Re Reuters: “Politicians are wavering over caps on carbon emissions, citing the economic costs of cutting emissions.”
Interesting how these same politicians never seem to waver over the costs of their personal war mongering activities - then, it’s budgets be damned.
Report thisBy Meme Mine, August 1, 2010 at 9:34 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Climate change has done to trusting science, blogs, corporate media and scientists, what Bush’s WMD
Report this‘s did for the neocons reputations. Politicians, Bernie Madoff, bad cops, O.J. Simpson, alter boy abusing priests and now .........scientists.
You criminal LAB COAT CONSULTANTS milked this Disco science far too long to regain any respect back.