The nice people of China are staying away because Wal*Mart puts less than 5% foreign in all the stores in China….

depriving all those nice people from purchasing foreign made items….

http://www.wal-martchina.com/english/walmart/index.htm

Where would the 20 million unemployed Americans be today if Wal*Mart had less than 5% foreign in their stores in the United States of America….

Where?

somebody said that one must take into account the fact that many people have no alternative to wallyworld and would thus tend toward alienation in response to the occupy-tactic. this kind of control, a systemic limit of options has a name: atropos. of course wally might be on the “list”, if there was a list…

it may be worth noting that the 1% are also subject to atropos, even more so than poor people. it is atropos when they resort to violence through their servile slaves - cops and military - it’s always violence because that’s the only tool they have. accordingly everybody knows what the rich will do. in strategy it’s important that the opponent not know what you will do. we know. that makes us stronger than them…so long as we stay calm, be brave, and wait for the signs…

the whole point of non-violence is to elicit a morally bankrupt response by power. often that response is so vile and vivid that the powerful lose power every time they use it, thus demonstrating to the whole world the fundamental weakness that their lordships single strategy creates. while wallyworld is vile, it’s also probably an unsuitable target. a “flash-0-mob general strike” would work better, at least according to theory. this is a new tactic - suddenly a crowd convenes and stops normal activity just long enough to get a response started, then spontaneously the crowd disperses - simple - but there are many of these at the same time. one would expect their lordships to jam or interrupt the radio-linked communications - cell phones etc - as soon as they can, so hand-held cheap walkie-talkies might be a good gadget to have…