|
|
May 24, 2013
|
|
Peruvians to Decide Between Progressive Future and Neoliberal PastPosted on Apr 28, 2011
In a presidential election next month, Peruvian voters will decide whether to trust their future to broad social welfare programs or the conservative economics of their now incarcerated former leader. —ARK
Advertisement Previous item: Is Rampant Speculation Driving Up the Price of Oil? Next item: Wal-Mart’s Customers Are Running Out of Money New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Kassandra Zuanich, April 29, 2011 at 11:49 am Link to this comment
a) how can you blame a daughter for her father’s crime
Report thisb) her father rid the country of the worst terrorism ANY country in the world has ever seen
c) Humala is the worst thing that can happen to Peru
By berniem, April 29, 2011 at 11:38 am Link to this comment
That the Preuvians would consider voting for a candidate not only discredited by kinship to a former despot and international criminal, but also an adherent to an economic philosophy which will continue that nation’s suzerainity to the exploitative wiles of the US is truly fascinating but not necessarily unbelievable knowing the effectiveness of Amerikan corporate propaganda. Just look at the lies and disinformation spread about universal health care and climate change along with the ridiculous myth about the wealthy, low taxes, and job creation!
Report thisBy gerard, April 28, 2011 at 6:11 pm Link to this comment
Why don’t magazines like the New Statesman print the names of the mining corporations, for instance? Are they the same as those giants in the U.S. who for 100 years have been allowing their miners to work in dangerous conditions and denying them the right to unionize? Do they have the same environmentally destructive policies as Massey, Peabody and others here in this country?
Report this‘
If we are to do anything serious about global warming and the working/living/human rights of “indigenous” people, we are going to have to know the names of owners and managers of outrageous working conditions worldwide. International corporations are not “nobody” though they might like to use anonymity to escape their responsibility as human beings who are born and die just like all the rest of us.