Henry Paulson, in his role as treasury secretary, is flanked by members of Congress as he briefs reporters about the economy on Sept. 19, 2008, two months after the meeting described in Bloomberg’s article on Tuesday.
Back in July of 2008, when most of us were still blissfully ignorant about the approaching economic apocalypse, then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson was very aware of some important market distress signals, and he chose to share some of those with an elite group of financial executives, Bloomberg reported Tuesday.
This is a long article that’s worth reading in full, not just to get a sense of how Paulson catered to his Wall Street cronies, but also how blurry the roles and rules are when it comes to the circulation of insider information on that level. And, of course, Goldman Sachs is all over this story.
Bloomberg:
Around the conference room table were a dozen or so hedge- fund managers and other Wall Street executives—at least five of them alumni of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS), of which Paulson was chief executive officer and chairman from 1999 to 2006. In addition to Eton Park founder Eric Mindich, they included such boldface names as Lone Pine Capital LLC founder Stephen Mandel, Dinakar Singh of TPG-Axon Capital Management LP and Daniel Och of Och-Ziff Capital Management Group LLC.
After a perfunctory discussion of the market turmoil, the fund manager says, the discussion turned to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Paulson said he had erred by not punishing Bear Stearns shareholders more severely. The secretary, then 62, went on to describe a possible scenario for placing Fannie and Freddie into “conservatorship”—a government seizure designed to allow the firms to continue operations despite heavy losses in the mortgage markets.
Stock Wipeout
Paulson explained that under this scenario, the common stock of the two government-sponsored enterprises, or GSEs, would be effectively wiped out. So too would the various classes of preferred stock, he said.
The fund manager says he was shocked that Paulson would furnish such specific information—to his mind, leaving little doubt that the Treasury Department would carry out the plan. The managers attending the meeting were thus given a choice opportunity to trade on that information.
We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.
In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.
Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.
Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.
Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.
By Dr Bones, November 29, 2011 at 4:30 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
It seems the equity markets is just an unnecessary and unneeded stage in the Government handing money to the rich who got public officials into office.
So we learn that America is a cesspool of corruption run by criminals.
Skullduggery in the highest echelons of Wall Street, no!? Who’d a thunk it?
Unfortunately conclusive proof is what’s required for our system of jurisprudence. Hearsay and speculation will not get the job done. At most, Paulson will be found guilty of poor judgment. By such is just punishment avoided.
Your comment: ” Martha, what do you have to say
about this?”
Makes you wonder doesn’t it? I love to see THAT
interview, Martha v. Paulson. I’d pay money to see it.
Maybe Martha could bring one of those $2.00 waffle
irons with her and play Suzy Homemaker with Paulson’s
head.
Sounds like Pelosi, Hoyer, and Obama better get to work on retro-active immunity for the hedge funds, as they did for the telecoms for warrantless domestic spying. Maybe they can just extend their own immunity from insider trading to cover their employers.
By Dr Bones, November 29, 2011 at 4:30 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
It seems the equity markets is just an unnecessary and unneeded stage in the Government handing money to the rich who got public officials into office.
So we learn that America is a cesspool of corruption run by criminals.
Report thisBy JDmysticDJ, November 29, 2011 at 3:18 pm Link to this comment
By such is just punishment avoided, and the truth obscured.
Report thisBy JDmysticDJ, November 29, 2011 at 3:14 pm Link to this comment
Skullduggery in the highest echelons of Wall Street, no!? Who’d a thunk it?
Unfortunately conclusive proof is what’s required for our system of jurisprudence. Hearsay and speculation will not get the job done. At most, Paulson will be found guilty of poor judgment. By such is just punishment avoided.
Report thisBy Outraged, November 29, 2011 at 1:16 pm Link to this comment
Re: socalcde
Your comment: ” Martha, what do you have to say
about this?”
Makes you wonder doesn’t it? I love to see THAT
Report thisinterview, Martha v. Paulson. I’d pay money to see it.
Maybe Martha could bring one of those $2.00 waffle
irons with her and play Suzy Homemaker with Paulson’s
head.
By Blueokie, November 29, 2011 at 11:21 am Link to this comment
Sounds like Pelosi, Hoyer, and Obama better get to work on retro-active immunity for the hedge funds, as they did for the telecoms for warrantless domestic spying. Maybe they can just extend their own immunity from insider trading to cover their employers.
Report thisBy socalcde, November 29, 2011 at 10:52 am Link to this comment
OK great. So now Paulson and a lot of Wall Streeters will be going to jail, right? Why am I skeptical? Martha, what do you have to say about this?
Report this