LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     gay marriage     barack obama     robert scheer     chris hedges     ndaa
Most Read

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Truthdiggers of the Week: 400,000 Canadians Launching the ‘Maple Spring’

Russia and Exxon Mobil Sign Arctic Oil Deal

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
The Bases of Empire

The Bases of Empire

By Catherine Lutz
$17.28

The Idea of Justice

The Idea of Justice

By Amartya Sen
$19.77

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Others, Besides Iranians, Aren’t Crazy About Sanctions

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Jul 27, 2010
Iran gas field
AP / Vahid Salemi

Portraits of the late Iranian revolutionary founder Ayatollah Khomeini, right, and supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei appear at a construction site at South Pars gas field in Assalouyeh, Iran, on July 19. The engineering arm of Iran’s powerful Revolutionary Guard, which was recently hit by U.N. sanctions, has partially withdrawn from developing the gas field, the Oil Ministry announced July 16.

When it comes to registering disapproval for Iran’s nuclear program, certain key members of the international community keep pushing the same button—that would be the one marked sanctions. But is this becoming more of a rote reflex than an effective strategy? Critics of Iran’s apparent plans, from within and without the country, aren’t all in accord on this issue. 

Also, Russia made its stance on the sanctions question clear with a disapproving statement Tuesday.  —KA

BBC:

How do you solve a problem like Iran’s nuclear programme? Especially when Iran does not see it as a problem and elevates what it says is a peaceful drive for nuclear energy to the status of a national cause?

The UN Security Council wrestled with this question again in June and came up with the same old answer: another round of sanctions. There was majority support from the 15 members because many were worried the Iranians might be secretly trying to build a nuclear bomb.

But no votes from Turkey and Brazil showed cracks in the consensus, a signal of unease with a policy that has so far failed to change Iran’s behaviour and of fears that it may lead to confrontation.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By gerard, July 28, 2010 at 8:24 am Link to this comment

From the report:  “The argument here is that any negotiations which focus only on Iran’s nuclear programme will not work. The agenda must be broader, covering concerns that matter to both Iran and the US.”
  To a sane person this seems only logical and right. Why is it that even when the US tries to “negotiate” there is first a reluctance to negotiate at all, and then always some crucial arbitrary “tone” that prevents fairness and comes off as “the U.S. is telling us what to do or else.” 
  That imperial attitude kills all negotiation at the roots. It is a grave error for the U.S. to serve as Israel’s pit bull.

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, July 27, 2010 at 3:51 pm Link to this comment

What has Iran done?

Report this
Ed Harges's avatar

By Ed Harges, July 27, 2010 at 10:28 am Link to this comment

Who cares whether this is an “effective strategy”, since the aim of the strategy—
maintaining Israel’s regional monopoly on nuclear weapons, military dominance,
and freedom to expand its borders and assault its neighbors with impunity—is
not a worthy goal.

In the US, debate on middle east policy is confined to arguing about what US
policy would best accomplish Israel’s objectives.

I’d like to offer another point of view: ph**k Israel’s objectives.

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.