|
|||
|
Others, Besides Iranians, Aren’t Crazy About SanctionsPosted on Jul 27, 2010
When it comes to registering disapproval for Iran’s nuclear program, certain key members of the international community keep pushing the same button—that would be the one marked sanctions. But is this becoming more of a rote reflex than an effective strategy? Critics of Iran’s apparent plans, from within and without the country, aren’t all in accord on this issue. Also, Russia made its stance on the sanctions question clear with a disapproving statement Tuesday. —KA
Advertisement Previous item: BP Puts a Price on Gulf Damage Control Next item: $8.7 Billion More Disappears in Iraq New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By gerard, July 28, 2010 at 8:24 am Link to this comment
From the report: “The argument here is that any negotiations which focus only on Iran’s nuclear programme will not work. The agenda must be broader, covering concerns that matter to both Iran and the US.”
Report thisTo a sane person this seems only logical and right. Why is it that even when the US tries to “negotiate” there is first a reluctance to negotiate at all, and then always some crucial arbitrary “tone” that prevents fairness and comes off as “the U.S. is telling us what to do or else.”
That imperial attitude kills all negotiation at the roots. It is a grave error for the U.S. to serve as Israel’s pit bull.
By PatrickHenry, July 27, 2010 at 3:51 pm Link to this comment
What has Iran done?
Report thisBy Ed Harges, July 27, 2010 at 10:28 am Link to this comment
Who cares whether this is an “effective strategy”, since the aim of the strategy—
maintaining Israel’s regional monopoly on nuclear weapons, military dominance,
and freedom to expand its borders and assault its neighbors with impunity—is
not a worthy goal.
In the US, debate on middle east policy is confined to arguing about what US
policy would best accomplish Israel’s objectives.
I’d like to offer another point of view: ph**k Israel’s objectives.
Report this