|
|||
|
Ortega Stirs Controversy in Re-Election BidPosted on Nov 13, 2010
Contemporary Nicaraguan politics have always been mired in conflict, be it in response to natural disasters, U.S.-sponsored terrorism, or depressing and dire poverty. And now President Daniel Ortega is using a “contested interpretation” of the country’s constitution to try to stay in power, incensing his opposition. Ortega has irked many of his former allies, with one former rebel fighter planning to run against him and another taking up arms in the same mountains where civil war raged for years. —JCL
Advertisement New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By Aaron Ortiz, November 13, 2010 at 7:14 pm Link to this comment
After re-reading the Times article, I find that it was JCL, who posted the article
Report thishere who used the word “contested”. The Times is not at fault, but JCL.
By Aaron Ortiz, November 13, 2010 at 7:14 pm Link to this comment
After re-reading the Times article, I find that it was JCL, who posted the article
Report thishere who used the word “contested”. The Times is not at fault here, but JCL.
By Aaron Ortiz, November 13, 2010 at 7:10 pm Link to this comment
Is the Times article referring to a bogus constitution of Nicaragua published this
September, without the approval of congress, while they were in recess?
If so, I would like to point out to those who are willing to trust the content of the
New York Times site without question…to stop doing so, and to start thinking
critically.
“Contested” is much too soft a word here, and I doubt they can plead ignorance in
Report thischoosing it.