|
|
May 26, 2013
|
|
Opposition Gains on Hugo ChavezPosted on Sep 27, 2010
They just had an election in Venezuela and Hugo Chavez’s party easily won a majority, so why is the opposition celebrating? Because big gains by the anti-Chavez crowd mean the president will not be able to count on a two-thirds majority to push through his legislative agenda, which sometimes coincides with his personal agenda.
Advertisement New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Maani, September 27, 2010 at 8:29 pm Link to this comment
This is a perfect example of the old saw that it takes a big ego to even run for major political office, and that that ego simply gets bigger as it remains in power. There are lots of things to like about Chavez, and reasons to support him. But it may be that the people are beginning to see (as others have pointed out here) that his ego is starting to run away with him. If he does not put his feet back on earth soon, he is in danger of becoming just another tinpot despot who deludes himself into thinking that the people still love him.
Peace.
Report thisBy rico, suave, September 27, 2010 at 6:51 pm Link to this comment
Did you see the videos of Hugo giving away refrigerators and dishwashers to prospective voters?
What a pathetic little pipsqueak.
Bolivar II my ass.
Report thisBy Micah'sbestfriend, September 27, 2010 at 5:28 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
There were some interesting differences between the Venezuela government and the USA government; some of which I admire. One is that there are more than two political parties represented at their federal level. I wish the USA had that. I believe legislation would go much smoother that way. Another difference is that sixty some percent of Venezuelans voted. I believe this is good too. In the USA, despite its stakes, less than fifty percent of its voting population voted in 2008. In fact, I am trying to think of the last time the number exceeded fifty percent.
All that being said, I am really not too keen on concepts such as elections, democracy, and voting. I am not a democracy fan. I believe democracy could work if the population is an educated one. I believe the one very important concept for a democracy to have in order to survive and thrive - education. If the population is not adequately educated, a democratic system could bring many problems for a given nation. USA being an appropriate case in point.
Democracy, in its purest form, merely states that “majority rule” in governance. Is the majority of a given nation right though about decisions regarding the preservation and improvement of its society? I don’t believe this is true in every instance. Here in the USA, we say that “majority rule with minority rights.” The latter is enforced via the court system. Unfortunately, the courts are imperfect. In addition, whenever the courts go against the majority opinion, its judges are called “activist.” I believe “principled” or “honorable” is a more apt description of a judge than “activist.”
Another reason I am not too much of a fan of democratic governance is because power is shared, thereby diffusing it. Although this type of political system is much more dynamic, democracy inevitably causes instability and uncertainty among the society. I do not believe that this is good for a nation, in my humble opinion. Give me a dictator that generally agrees with my overall beliefs, and rules in ways that correspond with my views, and I personally would be very happy under such a system.
The fact that we have democracy in the USA is the reason why very little is accomplished among the various governing bodies that make up the USA government. With shared power, it is much more difficult to enact policy because it is either debated to death or ignored. Who knows? Perhaps that particular legislation was desperately needed at the time but couldn’t be enacted. Of course, rarely do pro-democracy people think about the cons or the minuses of such of system. Instead, they proclaim that “freedom” and “liberty” pays the bills and aids in providing shelter and food for the populace.
Report thisBy berniem, September 27, 2010 at 4:08 pm Link to this comment
Hugo my friend. Although you have done much to help your country, you must not allow yourself to be duped into believing that the only means of confronting opposition is thru the acquisition and wielding of ever greater levels of power. As you well know, any efforts on your part to quash those in opposition with force only opens the door to those who would seek to undo you from without. Democracy and true Socialism can only be sustained by the greater application of same! If you remain true to your core ideals and vision of a better tomorrow for your people you will see that they will embrace you all the more while at the same time giving your foes ample rope to subdue themselves.
Report thisBy Wikileaks for Nobel, September 27, 2010 at 4:00 pm Link to this comment
I wish the article had more about the politics of the opposition group(s). I have long been concerned about Mr. Chavez’s view of himself as “indispensable to the Revolution.” I’ve heard that rhetoric before, and it has never resulted in the kind of radical, democratic society I favor. The world doesn’t need more Beloved Leaders and Presidents for Life, nor the clot of favored and privileged few who always constellate around this type.
That said, I also fervently hope that the elections in Venezuela were as honest and accurate as ours in the States are corrupt. Good luck to the Venezuelan people!
Report this