Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
June 28, 2017 Disclaimer: Please read.

Statements and opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors, not Truthdig. Truthdig takes no responsibility for such statements or opinions.

Senate Leaders Scramble for a Deal on Health Care Bill

What’s Next for the Bill Cosby Sex-Assault Case?

Truthdig Bazaar more items

Ear to the Ground
Email this item Print this item

Once Again, Obama Faces a Choice in Afghanistan

Posted on Jun 19, 2011
White House / Pete Souza

Back in 2009, President Obama was presented with two options for the war in Afghanistan: a troop surge favored by the military and a leaner counterterrorism strategy promoted by Vice President Joe Biden. He went with the surge, sending an additional 30,000 troops to fight in a war without purpose.

The third option, to end the war and withdraw the troops that were already there, was never seriously contemplated.

The president and his staff would say we needed to make sure al-Qaida could not again use Afghanistan as a staging ground for further attacks—apparently the terrorist camp facilities in Yemen, Indonesia and elsewhere are lacking. There is another obvious problem with this reasoning: Two of the president’s top advisers on the subject of terrorism, former CIA Director Leon Panetta and former National Security Adviser James Jones, estimated the number of al-Qaida operatives left in Afghanistan at less than 100.

That estimate was widely ignored by anybody except those who openly opposed the war, which is to say it was widely ignored. But now, it seems, some of the people who work in the White House may have seen the light. According to The New York Times, White House officials are in the president’s ear, arguing that the success against al-Qaida should accelerate withdrawal, while the military wants to keep the surge largely intact:

The focus on progress against Al Qaeda was also a counter to arguments made by Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and other military officials in recent days that the initial reduction of troops should be modest, and that American combat pressure should be maintained as long as possible so that the gains from the surge in troops are not sacrificed.

The military has been pressing for a plan under which only a few thousands troops out of the 100,000 currently in Afghanistan would come home immediately, with the bulk of the 30,000 troops sent last year remaining for another year or more.

Other government types have reached the same conclusion as the White House officials.

Last Wednesday, 24 Democrats, two Republicans and an independent signed a letter to Obama urging the president to make good on the July withdrawal he promised after ordering those additional 30,000 troops to Afghanistan.

The senators cited endemic corruption, the Panetta estimate of only 50 to 100 al-Qaida fighters left in the country and the assassination of Osama bin Laden as good reasons to get out. They also argued that rebuilding the country and its civic institutions does not “justify the loss of American lives or the investment of hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars.”

The two Republicans who signed on to the statement are Mike Lee of Utah and the one and only Rand Paul of Kentucky. The list also includes the anti-war progressives you would expect to find, such as Bernie Sanders, Al Franken and Barbara Boxer, as well as a few conservative Democrats, including Max Baucus, who so royally stank up the health care bill. 

The full letter is reprinted below (text from The Washington Post).

Despite rumors of newfound logic in the White House—even rumors printed by The New York Times—there’s no reason to believe Obama will not side with the military once again. He has played nice with the Pentagon throughout his presidency, whether on gays in the military or the surge in Afghanistan, and a fight with the brass would be unseemly in campaign season. Then again, we’re in campaign season, and the country is growing less patient with this, our longest war.  —PZS

June 15, 2011

The President

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President:

We write to express our strong support for a shift in strategy and the beginning of a sizable and sustained reduction of U.S. military forces in Afghanistan, beginning in July 2011.

In 2001 the United States rightfully and successfully intervened in Afghanistan with the goals of destroying al Qaeda’s safe haven, removing the Taliban government that sheltered al Qaeda, and pursuing those who planned the September 11 attacks on the United States. Those original goals have been largely met and today, as CIA Director Leon Panetta noted last June, “I think at most, we’re looking at maybe 50 to 100, maybe less” al Qaeda members remaining in Afghanistan.

In addition, over the past few years, U.S. forces have killed or captured dozens of significant al Qaeda leaders. Then, on May 2, 2011, American Special Forces acting under your direction located and killed Osama bin Laden. The death of the founder of al Qaeda is a major blow that further weakens the terrorist organization.

From the initial authorization of military force through your most recent State of the Union speech, combating al Qaeda has always been the rationale for our military presence in Afghanistan. Given our successes, it is the right moment to initiate a sizable and sustained reduction in forces, with the goal of steadily redeploying all regular combat troops.

There are those who argue that rather than reduce our forces, we should maintain a significant number of troops in order to support a lengthy counter-insurgency and nation building effort. This is misguided. We will never be able to secure and police every town and village in Afghanistan. Nor will we be able to build Afghanistan from the ground up into a Western-style democracy.

Endemic corruption in Afghanistan diverts resources intended to build roads, schools, and clinics, and some of these funds end up in the hands of the insurgents. Appointments of provincial and local officials on the basis of personal alliances and graft leads to deep mistrust by the Afghan population. While it is a laudable objective to attempt to build new civic institutions in Afghanistan, this goal does not justify the loss of American lives or the investment of hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars.

Instead of continuing to be embroiled in ancient local and regional conflicts in Afghanistan, we must accelerate the transfer of responsibility for Afghanistan’s development to the Afghan people and their government. We should maintain our capacity to eliminate any new terrorist threats, continue to train the Afghan National Security Forces, and maintain our diplomatic and humanitarian efforts. However, these objectives do not require the presence of over 100,000 American troops engaged in intensive combat operations.

Mr. President, according to our own intelligence officials, al Qaeda no longer has a large presence in Afghanistan, and, as the strike against bin Laden demonstrated, we have the capacity to confront our terrorist enemies with a dramatically smaller footprint. The costs of prolonging the war far outweigh the benefits. It is time for the United States to shift course in Afghanistan.

We urge you to follow through on the pledge you made to the American people to begin the redeployment of U.S. forces from Afghanistan this summer, and to do so in a manner that is sizable and sustained, and includes combat troops as well as logistical and support forces.

We look forward to working with you to pursue a strategy in Afghanistan that makes our nation stronger and more secure.


Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR)

Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT)

Sen. Tom Udall (D-NM)

Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT)

Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO)

Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-NM)

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA)

Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH)

Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA)

Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD)

Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND)

Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL)

Sen. Al Franken (D-MN)

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)

Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA)

Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)

Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA)

Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ)

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT)

Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ)

Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA)

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY)

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)

Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-NY)

Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI)

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR)

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Join the conversation

Load Comments
Go Right Young Man's avatar

By Go Right Young Man, June 20, 2011 at 8:02 pm Link to this comment

PBS NewsHour On-Line
Mon. 6/20

“Amid Push for Talks With Taliban, Where Do Rights of Afghan Women Fit In?”

Three Afghan women, influential figures in politics, business and non-governmental organizations, were in Washington last week meeting with senior members of the Obama administration and Congress on the topic of negotiating peace with the Taliban. Margaret Warner gets their views on the situation in their country.


These liberal Afghan woman, Peace Activists, say U.S. soldiers should begin leaving to prove U.S. intentions. Yet, simultaneously, they each argue that nobody’s soldiers should leave too quickly.  Not so fast that they each feel “unsafe” from various Taliban. - Apparently they fear Taliban types more than NATO or U.S. soldiers.

Yes, they say, soldiers should slowly leave.  Then each went on to explain how and why, they believe, the U.S. government and others should stay and remain involved. - An interesting dichotomy.

I personally believe the world owes the Afghan people a debt almost beyond repaying.  Leaving them to step backwards, particularly the woman, would be pure selfish cruelty.  The world did that in the 90’s.  It proved a disaster for Afghans.

Report this

By berniem, June 20, 2011 at 4:17 pm Link to this comment

Enough is enough! Let’s start Obama’s re-election campaign with articles of impeachment!

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, June 20, 2011 at 3:10 pm Link to this comment

Afghan tribal government - Loya Jirga has governed Afghan life for thousands of years, for Americans to try to impose our system of government and values on them is wrong.

Karzi is showing us the door.  Lets take this opportunity.

Report this

By c.d.embrey, June 20, 2011 at 2:52 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Obama NEVER caves! If GoldmanSachs wants the war to continue, Obama wants the war to continue. If GoldmanSachs wants the war to stop, then Obama wants the war to stop. Politicians follow the lead of their biggest campaign contributors - same as it ever was!

Why is anyone surprised?

Report this
mackTN's avatar

By mackTN, June 20, 2011 at 1:23 pm Link to this comment

The cost of these wars can no longer be justified.  Need I point out that BANKS &
CORPORATIONS did more to decimate our economy than any terrorist.  I would
support a war on them; it might yield better results and its purpose is clearly
understood by all Americans.

Report this

By gerard, June 20, 2011 at 11:46 am Link to this comment

According to the Campaign for Peace and

...‘the U.S. Conference of Mayors has just passed a resolution today urging the speedy end to wars and the redirection of all that money to useful projects. This is the first time the mayors have taken such an action since Vietnam. We need to build on this important victory!”

Report this

By phil, June 20, 2011 at 10:00 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Max Baucus is a socialist, and his Obamacare program is pure socialism. If you want to see a hilarious blog and a great post, check this on out:
The blog focuses on Max Baucus and his failure as a senator.

Report this
Go Right Young Man's avatar

By Go Right Young Man, June 20, 2011 at 8:10 am Link to this comment

“I think at most, we’re looking at maybe 50 to 100, maybe less al Qaeda members remaining in Afghanistan.”


I wonder if that has anything to do with NATO forces and several dozen NGOs currently in Afghanistan. - The world dislikes a vacuum.

Leaving Afghanistan in the 1990s was as big a mistake as leaving now would be.  The Afghan people deserve better.

Report this

By Dr Leo, June 20, 2011 at 6:54 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

..and, once again, he will cave.

Report this
thecrow's avatar

By thecrow, June 20, 2011 at 4:38 am Link to this comment

Obama made his “choice” before the election:

“Sounding presidential, Senator Barack Obama said Wednesday he would order a surge of U.S. troops – perhaps 15,000 or more – to Afghanistan as soon as he reached the White House.

‘The terrorists who attacked us on 9/11 are still at large and plotting,’ he said, echoing Mr. Bush’s oft-repeated refrain.”

Report this
Right Top, Site wide - Care2
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide

Like Truthdig on Facebook