|
|
May 21, 2013
|
|
Obama’s USDA Leaves Subsidy Payees More Places to HidePosted on May 20, 2010
Yasha Levine, who reported for us on tea party diva Michele Bachmann’s hypocritical penchant for federal farm subsidies, tipped us off that the Obama administration and Congress are making it harder to track the millionaires who hit up Uncle Sam for crop cash.
Advertisement Previous item: Don’t Ask, Don’t Count: Pentagon Underreports Discharges Next item: U.S. Stocks Take a Nosedive as Euro Worries Rise New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By John Thacker, May 24, 2010 at 9:06 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I don’t really care too much if a politicians receives subsidies, so long as the program is run in a fair manners. I care about how a politician votes.
The complaints about Bachmann seem to me to be like calling a Democrat “hypocritical” for accepting the Bush tax cuts (and not voluntarily sending the money back to the Treasury, which you can do) while voting against them. So?
Report thisBy Karl Bremer, May 20, 2010 at 8:06 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The story of Michele Bachmann’s farm subsidies was originally by myself in 2007 here:
http://tinyurl.com/6dq326
and here:
http://tinyurl.com/5t6rqf
Report thisBy Blackspeare, May 20, 2010 at 2:22 pm Link to this comment
Farm subsidies are an example of a one time needed policy that has outlived it’s original intent and has become a coveted cash cow protected by legislators that feed off that cow via lobbyist and financial support. Supporting a legislator with a $100,000 donation to continue receiving a subsidy of $1,000,000 is a no brainer. It’s the prime example of a win/win situation.
Report this