LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     gay marriage     barack obama     ndaa     robert scheer     chris hedges
Most Read

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Truthdiggers of the Week: 400,000 Canadians Launching the ‘Maple Spring’

Russia and Exxon Mobil Sign Arctic Oil Deal

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Obama Unveils New Nuke Policy

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Apr 6, 2010
Obama
White House / Pete Souza

President Barack Obama made the auspicious step of releasing his new Nuclear Posture Review on Tuesday, two days before he was due to co-sign an arms reduction treaty with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in Prague. So what, you may wonder, is the Nuclear Posture Review? The BBC has some details.

BBC:

The Nuclear Posture Review, published on Tuesday, outlines plans for “achieving substantial further nuclear force reductions” beyond the new treaty.

Every president since 1991 conducts such a review - the last one took place in 2001 at the start of George W Bush’s administration.

But Mr Obama set high expectations when he declared America’s commitment to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons in Prague last year.

For the first time, the US is ruling out a nuclear response to attacks on America involving biological, chemical or conventional weapons.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By Commune115, April 6, 2010 at 6:51 pm Link to this comment

The way Obama is basically threatening Iran with destruction eventhough it has no nukes is pretty psychotic. Anyone who still sings praises to this man is sick in the head.

Report this

By ofersince72, April 6, 2010 at 3:09 pm Link to this comment

Decipher this for you

It is an appearance for the Russains and the U.S.

What they are really doing,  is getting rid of out dated
and useless nucks and found a way to get polical points
doing so.

All the while building the new generation of nuclear
warheads that Obama already has ordered and paid for
with our money.
Obama is crafty, with a shrewd smile and a silver tongue.

Report this

By NZDoug, April 6, 2010 at 3:08 pm Link to this comment

and Israel neither confirms or denies, so its SOS, same old s***.........

Report this

By Claus Eric Hamle, April 6, 2010 at 3:04 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The Problem is that the Pentagon aims to achieve a disarming and unanswerable first-strike capability. On the new missiles on ships in the Black Sea in Bulgaria and on land in Romania and Poland by 2015 former Trident missile engineer Bob Aldridge-www.plrc.org-commented, “Whether on ships or land, they are still a necessary component for an unanswerable first strike”.

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, April 6, 2010 at 1:50 pm Link to this comment

Samson:

I agree! I’m a right wing wacko, but this time I party company with Rush and Sean. They’re panties are all twisted by the thought that we’re laying down our big guns.

The way I see it, the policy only applies to signatories of the NPT who actually have nukes. Iran is neither. So if Iran attacks us with pea shooters, we can, even under the new dispensation, turn their fucking country to glass.

I think this is a direct, overt, explicit message to Iran: Don’t even think about the next step. The sublety is brilliant.

Report this
Samson's avatar

By Samson, April 6, 2010 at 1:41 pm Link to this comment

If Bush was still President, and if he released exactly the same document, the headline on the Democrat-leaning sites would have been.

“Bush leaves option of nuclear attack on Iran open.”

That’s the policy still.  But since its Obama, we’ll be told how wonderful it is that the US still keeps nuclear weapons and still threatens to use them whenever it chooses to do so.

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.