LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 24, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Colbert Slams PBS for Appeasing Koch Brothers

Three Questions Left Unanswered by Obama’s Counterterrorism Speech

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

Marching in Chicago: Resisting Rahm Emanuel’s Neoliberal Savagery

Corporate Tax Cheats by the Numbers

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * New York City’s Summers May Heat Up

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Obama Proposes Offshore Drilling Plan

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Mar 31, 2010
offshore drilling
Wikimedia Commons / Joint Pipeline Office

Here we have Northstar Island, an artificial island designed for oil and gas drilling north of Alaska.

If you thought “drill, baby, drill!” was only a right-wing slogan, think again. On Wednesday, President Barack Obama outlined a plan for doing a little drilling for oil and gas off a few sections of our nation’s coastline, including the East Coast, Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico.  —KA

The New York Times:

Angering environmentalists and pleasing industry groups, Obama and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said the expansion in drilling would balance the need to boost domestic energy production while protecting natural resources.

“The bottom line is this: Given our energy needs, in order to sustain economic growth and produce jobs and keep our businesses competitive, we are going to need to harness traditional sources of fuel even as we ramp up production of new sources of renewable, homegrown energy,” Obama said.

The plan calls for exploration in areas from Delaware to off the coastline of central Florida, while keeping the East Coast from New Jersey northward closed to oil and gas development. But actual drilling would only take place after detailed study of the regions, which could take years.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By gerard, April 1, 2010 at 11:51 am Link to this comment

What’s Obama got against the East Coast, from Delaware to Florida?  Looks like between dragging “clean” coal out of the Appalachians, polluting the entire area with fly ash, and sucking out all the oil from under the East Coast, six or eight states will simply be sacrificed to energy guzzling. Then the Gulf shores will be next, and after that the shoreline from California north to Alaska. 
  As long as the old black energy sources are paid to keep on guzzling, where’s the impetus and the money to develop green sources?

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, April 1, 2010 at 11:15 am Link to this comment

RdV:
Well jackass, you’re wrong about the polls.

Get out of the welfare office and hang out with taxpayers for a while and you’ll know what I mean.

Report this

By RdV, April 1, 2010 at 8:39 am Link to this comment

Progressives throwing Obama under the bus for championing Right-wing policy?

  Guessing by the corporate worshipping rfidler, genuflecting before the throne of the free market long after it has been exposed as a criminal fraud, it seems they have a new hero to add to their pantheon of bankers, lobbiests, and oil and gas overlords.
  Check the polls and choose an issue from the environment to healthcare, jackass, the majority of the country is to the Left of Obama.

Report this

By cfalde, April 1, 2010 at 7:54 am Link to this comment

This is throwing the right a bone.

The drilling won’t even be able to begin for at least 2-5yrs. 

After the republicans screaming about getting walked over with the health care legislation, this is politics.  They can’t argue against it. They can’t vote against it.  So they kinda have to accept it.

Its also a practial move to at least show that he knows he has to do something now while the green jobs are being created.  Even though there is probably not enough to make a significant difference in foriegn oil consumption.

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, April 1, 2010 at 7:21 am Link to this comment

I just LOVE watching you progs throwing Obama under the bus. You are all so naive!

You can’t sit around a coffee house in Sausalito talking in your echo chamber, or consulting your fringe media about the great progressive awakening and, presto, make it so.

The plain fact is, the American public is much more conservative than you want them to be, and not nearly as stupid.

The plain fact is, corporations are not as evil as you want them to be, and are a lot better at solving ANY problem than government bureaucrats are.

Report this

By RdV, April 1, 2010 at 4:30 am Link to this comment

All I can do is add my voice to the chorus and agree it is more of the same.
  Is there anything or anyone this asswipe isn’t willing to throw under the bus to pander to the “savvy businessmen” masters? The Environment is just another example in a growing list of daily assaults from education to women’s rights to the environment to foreign policy. Yet there will be those claiming to speak for the Left like Katrina Vanden Heuval and other “limosine liberals” from “The Nation” who continue to champion Obama’s health Insurance plan as historical reform. And people wonder where the Left is? They gush over Obama with school girl crushes, seemingly infatuated with their superficially politically correct hero. Obama appeals to these “progressives”, like the predictably capitulating Dennis Kucinich (so how is that voting in progressives working out?)by claiming he is the victim of Right-wing forces out to destroy his presidency. Yet all the while he is promoting Right-wing policy—anticipating those progressives—who actually represent the majority view, will fall into line.
  One is left to suspect that if the Right opposed creating a holiday in memorializing Dr King, Obama would beat them to the punch.
  What bothers me the most is so many progressives feel the need to temper their criticism—including Mr.Scheer, always excusing Obama with caveats of every variety. They can’t quite bring themselves to condemn Obama for the exact same things they would rave against Bush for. I am not so sure we are better off in that case. At least with Bush, the Left didn’t hesitate. Obama uses the opportunity to ram thing through—and then holds a big PR blitz and everyone jumps aboard celebrating “historical reform” that is just another backroom corporate deal- with a pathetic bone tossed as significant progress and a promise for real change in the future.
  Obama may feel like he made history becoming the first African-American to reach the Whie House—but how will history judge him when he is little more than a sevile pawn of the power-broker masters?

Report this

By SoTexGuy, April 1, 2010 at 4:06 am Link to this comment

So.. here’s a wild scenario.. what happens when even one small parcel of these new leases.. maybe within sight of Ft. Lauderdale.. is taken up by a Chinese firm, they hire zero Americans to do the work, bring in a jack-up rig built in Tampico, Mexico.. float the crude to Venezuela to be fractured and (you get the point).. Will this result in any backlash for Obama flip-flopping on these core issues?

  There’s nothing in place to prevent any such action.. And Our Global economy will suck up any new production here or anywhere in the world.. What’s the statistic? China alone may need the capacity to several more Saudi Arabias in the next decades? Whatever they get on these new leases won’t matter to average Americans, there will still be no difference in the price of crude taken from the bloody sands of Iraq and shipped halfway across the globe .. than that produced by the good old boy patriots in Iraan, TEXAS!

  I think it’s hilarious that the rethuglicans are as angry and stand-offish over this decision as any previous move by Obama. Even though it looks like one of their ideas! My friends who are die-hard Obama groupies insist this is all part of the President’s plans to bring the country together for real change in the right direction..

Hopefully, they are right! Otherwise it looks as if Obama is so giddy at the reality of there being no one of either (or any) party who looks to be able to challenge him in 2012 that he is playing pinball with the people who elected him.. just for fun!

Adios!

Report this

By C.Curtis.Dillon, April 1, 2010 at 2:28 am Link to this comment

Why is anyone surprised?  This guy proposes to drill for more oil so we can bridge the time it takes to get our green tech industry “up and running”.  This is the same guy who, pretty much, trashed Copenhagen.  This is the guy who has done all these anti-progressive things since he became president.  No one should be surprised by this announcement.  It is classic Obama!

Report this

By pundaint, April 1, 2010 at 12:37 am Link to this comment

Who is this poseur who dares to disenfranchise the majority voters who rejected
the Republican agenda in 2008?

Report this
Russian Paul's avatar

By Russian Paul, March 31, 2010 at 11:10 pm Link to this comment

Obama does whatever his corporate sponsors want him to do, it’s that simple.

Report this

By iburl, March 31, 2010 at 10:26 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

We need an Apollo program to create a green energy revolution.  Despoiling the
environment by coal, nukes and oil seems to be the Palin/Cheney/Obama plan. Meet
the new boss…Too bad Van Jones was a secret Maoist (according to Glenn Beck) and
Obama fired him.

Report this

By Shift, March 31, 2010 at 3:48 pm Link to this comment

Obama cuts the throats of environmentalists, panders to big oil, and pockets a bundle for his Democratic right.

Report this

By Tim Kelly, March 31, 2010 at 2:51 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Wow.  Who needs the Republicans?  The Democrats are doing pretty good at making sure the right-wing agenda moves forward.

Seriously, what arguments are the Democratic apologists going to put forth this November as to why we should vote for them over third party candidates?

Report this

By Mark, March 31, 2010 at 1:56 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Thank god I voted for BHO, and not those environmental despoilers in the GOP.

Besides, we’ll need the oil to make gasoline so we can drive our cars to all those “green” jobs the POTUS wants to make.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.