LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 12, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Frightening Charts From the Senate Inequality Hearing

Morris Berman and the Decline of America

More From Chris Hedges on Black Bloc

Perfection

Will Mortgage Settlement Avoid Repeating Obama’s Foreclosure Failures?

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Political Divide

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
Reckless Endangerment

Reckless Endangerment

By Gretchen Morgenson, Joshua Rosner
$17.04

Islam, South Asia, and the West

Islam, South Asia, and the West

By Francis Robinson
$29.95

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Obama Invites Republicans, Dems to Health Care Huddle

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Share
Posted on Feb 8, 2010
Obama
The White House / Pete Souza

President Obama delivers his health care address to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 9, 2009.

Still clearly hoping that health care reform legislation might clear Congress at some point during his tenure in office, President Obama has summoned Republican and Democratic lawmakers to “put their ideas on the table” later this month and discuss possible ways to push a workable bill through both the House and Senate. However, some GOP types are already saying that there’s no way the bill would earn their approval in anything resembling its current form.  —KA

Bloomberg:

At the planned half-day meeting, Obama said he wants a “large meeting with Republicans and Democrats to go through, systematically, all the best ideas that are out there and move it forward.” Obama wants live television coverage of the meeting, said a White House official who asked not to be named.

Asked about starting over on the health-care debate, Obama said he wants to look at “very specific” ideas that Republicans present.

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, responding to Obama’s idea, said legislation should start from scratch if Obama wants a measure that can get support from both parties.

“If we are to reach a bipartisan consensus, the White House can start by shelving the current health-spending bill,” McConnell said in an e-mailed statement. “There are a number of issues with bipartisan support that we can start with when the 2,700-page bill is put on the shelf.”

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By ofersince72, February 9, 2010 at 6:32 am Link to this comment

I followed Capitol Hill’s sneaky little tricks
since the Dems took control in 2006 too Samson.
The reason i once again voted Nader.
For all those that still believe there is some sort
of political fix…remember that in 1968 this
country was in massive political LIBERAL demonstration.
NIXON WON HANDILY

same in 1972,  McGovern hardly got a vote.

Report this

By Vic Anderson, February 8, 2010 at 4:23 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This is NOT what’s meant by Congressional “RECONCILIATION”! Obummer’s an
abject jackass soul. Instead, Medicare (single-payer) for ALL!

Report this
Samson's avatar

By Samson, February 8, 2010 at 10:57 am Link to this comment

The filibuster has been around for most of the history of the country.  So, naturally, strategies on how to deal with it have also long been known.

One example is to combine the bill you want with something the other side wants.  Then they are reluctant to filibuster.  In this case, maybe health care gets combined with the pork-heavy Homeland Security bill.  The “Health and Homeland Security Act of 2010”.  Or, if not that, then find something else the Republicans want passed and put the two bills together into one.

What’s most important to notice is the way that Obama, Reid and the Democrats are choosing strategies that give the Republicans the maximum amount of power with the filibuster.  Obama and the Democrats are deliberately choosing to put this bill out on its own so it can be filibustered.

This is nothing new.  Reid did the same thing with the war issues in the last Congress.  He deliberately put a proposal to end the war in a separate bill so it could be easily vetoed.  This of course was after he declined to use the filibuster himself to end the wars.  Then, Reid deliberately chose a strategy that needed 66 votes to pass after declining a strategy that could have succeeded with 41 votes.

Now you see Reid, Obama and the Democrats deliberately choosing strategies that need 60 votes to pass.

To the Democrats, doing nothing, while being able to blame the Republicans, seems to be their preferred strategy.  This way, they get to tell their rich contributors that they are safe from say any real health care reform, while trying to lie to and con the voters into thinking that the Democrats actually want some sort of health care reform.

Report this
Samson's avatar

By Samson, February 8, 2010 at 10:48 am Link to this comment

Of course, no leftist supporters of single-payer will be invited to the meeting.  Obama only talks with Republicans.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.