Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
June 19, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     nsa     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Reporter Who Brought Down the 'Runaway General' Dead at 33

The Terror Con

Nate Silver vs. Politico: It's on Again

Greenland's Great Melt Is Pinned On Climate Change

The Making of a Global Security State

Most Comments
Most Emailed

 * NEW! * Greenland’s Great Melt Is Pinned On Climate Change
The Making of a Global Security State



The Unwinding


Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Obama Cuts Nuclear Deal With Russia

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Mar 24, 2010
DoD / Staff Sgt. Alan R. Wycheck

Less than a year after President Barack Obama called for a world without nuclear weapons, the U.S. and Russia have agreed to reduce the number of deployed nukes by more than 25 percent. The White House hopes the agreement, which will pick up where the old Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty left off, will set the stage for more ambitious cuts in the future.

After all, the new treaty would still leave 1,600 warheads deployed on each side, with thousands more in storage.

The treaty still needs to be finalized, signed by the presidents and approved by their respective legislative bodies.  —PZS

New York Times:

The treaty would require each side to reduce deployed strategic nuclear warheads to roughly 1,600, down from 2,200 now, officials have said. It would also oblige each side to reduce its arsenal of strategic bombers and land- and sea-based missiles to 800, half the old limit of 1,600.

Arms control advocates consider those reductions to be relatively modest. But Mr. Obama wanted to negotiate a relatively straightforward replacement for the Start treaty as a way to rebuild trust with Moscow, leading to more ambitious agreements down the road.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, April 7, 2010 at 6:11 pm Link to this comment

So much for the treaty, the ABM’s apparently are not on the table.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article7089516.ece

Report this

By radson, March 25, 2010 at 4:24 pm Link to this comment

So they agreed to remove one bullet from the revolver ,heck I feel a lot safer now.

Report this

By gerard, March 25, 2010 at 9:47 am Link to this comment

rfidler:  You’re fun, too—sort of.  The reason you don’t “get” what I say is that you are too literal.  You probably despise poetry, and the words “symbol”’ and “metaphor” aren’t in your vocabulary.  That’s okay.  It takes all kinds.  I’m just glad you read me and bother to write back. There’s hope.

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, March 25, 2010 at 7:49 am Link to this comment

gerard:
“Like NASA “raping” the moon last October, or whenever it was. I wrote them a polite letter about it, but of course they never answered.”

Here’s the thing. NASA, unlike truthdig, is a mature, serious, adult organization. How does one “rape” the moon? And why would NASA waste one breath on responding to someone who thinks in terms like that?

The reason I’m responding is because you’re so much fun to make fun of, and I have a lot of free time.

Report this

By ender, March 25, 2010 at 6:21 am Link to this comment

Catch up Mr. Henry.  One of Pres. Obama’s first positive acts was to stop the deployment of the ABMs to Poland.  That is why he is able to start arms reduction talks with Russia now.

Darth Cheney and the axis of evil were intent on restarting an arms race with Russia so they could pour $Trillions into updating our nuclear arsenal for the defense industry.

If Pres. Obama acheives nothing else during his tenure because the Republicants destroy the Congressional process, he has still been a success.  He has stood us down from the edge of nuclear agreession and set the nuclear war clock back to preBush levels.

Report this

By gerard, March 24, 2010 at 5:05 pm Link to this comment

P.S.  Am I the only one who “gets” the implications of a gigantic missile painted pink? But don’t let this comment push the reset button on the entire string. It’s just that the whole military thng is so-o-o-o revealing.  Like NASA “raping” the moon last October, or whenever it was. I wrote them a polite letter about it, but of course they never answered; just removed it from the online site. Censored!

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, March 24, 2010 at 3:40 pm Link to this comment

I must grudgingly applaude this step. We need nukes, but not thousands of them.

And by the way, PatHenry, the ABMs are on the table.

Report this

By Commune115, March 24, 2010 at 3:35 pm Link to this comment

How’s about forcing Israel to reduce its arsenal of nukes? Hey Barack, want to be ambitious? Why not lift the embargo on Cuba?

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, March 24, 2010 at 3:24 pm Link to this comment

Now if we can get Obama to cancel those ABM missiles along Russia’s border which pisses off Russia the most.

Report this

By gerard, March 24, 2010 at 2:43 pm Link to this comment

One more small step for mankind, womankind, and most of all childkind!

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.