LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
December 1, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Addicted to Nonsense

Michael Moore to Obama: 'Say It Isn't So'

Goodman on Goodman

Chris Hedges on Books About War

The Copenhagen Conundrum

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * The Copenhagen Conundrum
Addicted to Nonsense

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

None of the Above

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Apr 24, 2007

It may sound redundant or contradictory, but Florida state Sen. Mike Bennett proposed a bill that would give voters another ballot choice besides the candidates in the running:  “I choose not to vote.”  Floridians fatigued by the alleged frauds and hanging chads of recent years (as well as mudslinging campaigns), could signal their distaste by using the new option.


Local6.com:

Hoping to prevent a repeat, he persuaded the Senate Ethics and Elections Committee to approve a bill, SB-494, on Monday that would require ballots to have the additional option of “I choose not to vote.”

That option could not win a race, and the actual candidate with the highest number of votes would win the election.

Bennett, R-Bradenton, said the no-choice option would enable uninformed or disgusted voters to opt out in a way that clearly displays their intention to abstain. ...

Read more

 

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By DennisD, April 24, 2007 at 11:10 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Why not tie our elections in with American Idol so they’ll be something the average uninformed voter can comprehend. Make them the complete farce they’ve long since become to the rest of the world. “None of the above” is what we have running the country into the ground right now.

Report this

By Douglas Chalmers, April 24, 2007 at 8:00 pm #

There is a problem with what to do when none of the candidates on either side are satisfactory. In the end, though, choosing the lesser evil is always better than allowing the worst to win by default. You can always change things again later at the next election.

Report this

By Trigger finger, April 24, 2007 at 5:04 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

If you chose not to vote, in Florida, that’s counted on the Bush side of the ballot.

If you voted for Kerry, in Florida, that’s counted on the Bush side of the ballot.

If you voted for bush, in the USA, that’s counted on the moron side of the ballot.

It’s all pretty simple, just like the moron.  He is so simple, he can read a couple of shak spears over a weekend.  Either that means there are a lot of pictures in his shak spears or not very many, depending on his simple comprehension of comic book pictures.  He enjoys a good shak spear with his morning donut too.

Report this

By QuyTran, April 24, 2007 at 3:09 pm #

I choose not to vote over 6 years ago when Bush/Cheney on the ticket !

Report this

By oregoncharles, April 24, 2007 at 1:08 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

That is a fake alternative.  A genuine “None of the Above” applies to EACH ballot slot, and can win that race, sending it back to renominations.  It means that all candidates have been rejected.  The Russians have this option, or used to, but it hasn’t done them much good. 

You can make a similar statement by skipping a particular ballot line; this is the “undervote”, and it is counted, but it isn’t binding - the listed candidate with the most votes wins.  It does cause confusion, since it can be taken as a sign that the voter was unable to register a vote on that line.  Unless you have good paper ballots - in Oregon, it’s taken as intentional.

You could also writein “no-one”; no idea what would happen if that one won, but it would certainly be humiliating for the lousy candidates listed.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.