LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     gay marriage     barack obama     chris hedges     ndaa     robert scheer
Most Read

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Truthdiggers of the Week: 400,000 Canadians Launching the ‘Maple Spring’

I Can't Hear Myself Think

Russia and Exxon Mobil Sign Arctic Oil Deal

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar

‘A Billion Wicked Thoughts’

By Ogi Ogas (Author), Sai Gaddam (Author)

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

No More Orange Alerts

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Jan 27, 2011
Flickr / Chuck Coker

Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano is expected to announce the retirement of George W. Bush’s color-coded terror alert system that always seemed like an easy way to terrify the public. In its day, the color-coded threat indicator only hit red (severe) once, and never dropped below yellow (elevated).

CNN:

The much-maligned, color-coded Homeland Security Advisory System is about to be consigned to the proverbial dustbin of history.

Not that anyone is really paying attention.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano is expected to announce Thursday that the almost 9-year-old threat alert system will go away in April. It will be replaced by the new National Terror Advisory System that will focus on specific threats in geographical areas, a department source said Wednesday.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By Inherit The Wind, January 27, 2011 at 4:43 pm Link to this comment

Rico:

Those who tell us “you need to give up your rights and your freedoms so we can protect you” ARE the bad guys!

Report this
fearnotruth's avatar

By fearnotruth, January 27, 2011 at 12:05 pm Link to this comment

There will be when bad guys promise to stop trying to blow us up.

hear, hear!

e.g.

Did the real story behind the Minot-Barksdale nuke missile flight come out or was it a cover-up?

by Robert C. Sage

“It makes the hair stand up on the back of my neck”,

said a Pentagon official, after the unauthorized transport of six nuclear-armed cruise missiles. A B-52 flew the nukes from Minot AFB to Barksdale AFB on August 30, 2007. This should be treated as a watershed event. It is the first reported case of unauthorized movement of American nuclear weapons in history. As a result, the U.S. Air Force disciplined 60 persons and conducted a “stand down”, however given the many subverted safeguards and the number of people involved, the American public deserves full disclosure. All of America’s nuclear arsenal is protected by multiple levels of approvals for any location or status changes, have alarms and detection systems for radiation, explosives,  metal and motion. Lack of clear answers on what happened spells a government cover-up.

full article: http://www.helium.com/items/680943-minot-barksdale-nuclear-missile-cover-up

lesson: to find the author of any so-called ‘terrorist’ WMD event (heaven forbid), don’t waste time searching the caves of the Hindu Kush; the ‘near miss’ cited in the article should have lead investigators immediately to the cave beneath the Naval Observatory!

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, January 27, 2011 at 11:32 am Link to this comment

ITW:

There will be when bad guys promise to stop trying to blow us up.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, January 27, 2011 at 10:01 am Link to this comment

I wish there was an announcement to end the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act and the current version of the FISA.

Report this

By M L, January 27, 2011 at 9:15 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Cheny was the architect of the war on terror and his legacy remains a massive post tramatic stress disorder for millions of people around the world. He and Rove were the masters of marketing fear and terror.  We will spend years rebuilding lives and infrastructures he destroyed for profit and agreed.

Report this

By HC, January 27, 2011 at 9:14 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

What color is the sky in your world, Dumbya…?

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, January 27, 2011 at 8:46 am Link to this comment

“Bush’s color-coded terror alert system that always seemed like an easy way to terrify the public.”

This is what the government is good at, no matter who’s in charge folks. Are you sure you want MORE power in their hands?

Report this

By surfnow, January 27, 2011 at 8:08 am Link to this comment

99 percent of the ” War on Terror”  is a lie and a fake. But the Amerikan public has no one to blame but itself. Just the name ” Homeland Security” is enough to make me sick. How close to the Nazi ” Fatherland” do we have to come to before people say enough is enough.

Report this
fearnotruth's avatar

By fearnotruth, January 27, 2011 at 3:47 am Link to this comment

from the article: The threat level was raised to red/severe once—on August 10,  2006, and only for commercial flights from the United Kingdom to the United States—when British authorities announced they had disrupted a major plot to blow up aircraft.

reference: The 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot was a terrorist plot to detonate liquid explosives carried on board at least 10 airliners travelling from the United Kingdom to the United States and Canada.

perspective: [...] Amidst the madness a word of sense was spoken by former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray:

Many [of those arrested] did not even have passports, which given the efficiency of the UK Passport Agency would mean they couldn’t be a plane bomber for quite some time … In the absence of bombs and airline tickets, and in many cases passports, it could be pretty difficult to convince a jury beyond reasonable doubt that individuals intended to go through with suicide bombings, whatever rash stuff they may have bragged in internet chat rooms…. Then an interrogation in Pakistan revealed the details of this amazing plot to blow up multiple planes … Of course, the interrogators of the Pakistani dictator have their ways of making people sing like canaries. As I witnessed in Uzbekistan, you can get the most extraordinary information this way. The trouble is it always tends to give the interrogators all they might want, and more, in a desperate effort to stop or avert torture. What it doesn’t give is the truth. [...]

According to Lieutenant-Colonel (ret.) Nigel Wylde, a former senior British Army Intelligence Officer with decades of anti-terror and explosives experience,  the whole plot was a ‘fiction’ (6) and the explosives in question could not possibly have been produced on the plane. “So who came up with the idea that a bomb could be made on board?  Not Al Qaeda for sure. It would not work. Bin Laden is interested in success not deterrence by failure,” Wylde stated. He suggested that the plot was an invention of the UK security services in order to justify wide-ranging new security measures that threaten to permanently curtail civil liberties and to suspend sections of the United Kingdom’s Human Rights Act of 1998. Wyle added that, if there was a conspiracy, “it did not involve manufacturing the explosives in the loo,” as this simply “could not have worked.” The process would be quickly and easily detected.  The fumes of the chemicals in the toilet “would be smelt by anybody in the area.” They would also inevitably “cause the alarms in the toilet and in the air change system in the aircraft to be triggered.”

Key information was supposed to have been obtained from Pakistan but what did Pakistan have to do with it? There’s no need to go to Pakistan to learn that mixing acetone, sulphuric acid and peroxide won’t make a bomb, especially not in an aircraft toilet – that’s only in the Hollywood movies. Those three chemicals would form a nasty mixture which would stink very badly, but they would require a freezing cabinet and a fume cupboard for the reaction to work, ie produce TATP – adding a drop of sulphuric acid at a time, taking several hours, then a day of the TATP to separate out). Also, what about the detonators? Without a detonator, its not a bomb*.  [...]

complete aticle: http://terroronthetube.co.uk/related-articles/the-heathrow-liquid-bomb-hoax/

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.